PubMed · 7648087
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
O M Jolobe. 1995. Splenic abscess.. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800820758
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: To compare the results, limitations, and complications of the surgical treatment of bilateral hepatolithiasis and intrahepatic biliary strictures with left hepatectomy and without left hepatectomy. DESIGN: Case-controlled study. SETTING: Referral center. PATIENTS: During a 12-year period, 103 patients with bilateral hepatolithiasis and intrahepatic biliary strictures underwent surgical treatment. Group A (n = 73) received left hepatic resection (lateral segmentectomy or lobectomy) and postoperative biliary dilatation with residual stone extraction. Group B (n = 30) underwent the same procedures except for left hepatectomy. INTERVENTIONS: Left lateral segmentectomy or left lobectomy, choledocholithotomy, postoperative cholangioscopic treatments (electrohydraulic lithotripsy, other lithotripsy, lithotomy, balloon dilatation, etc. via T tube or precutaneous transhepatic route). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Days of hospitalization, incidence of major and minor complications, mortality rates, and the rates of residual stones and stone recurrence were compared. RESULTS: Group A and B had similarly low postoperative 1-month mortality rates of 5.5% and 6.7%, respectively. The main cause of death in both groups was uncontrollable septicemia. The main major complications in group A were intra-abdominal abscess and upper gastrointestinal bleeding; the major complication in group B was massive hemobilia. Group B had a significantly higher overall rate of complications (53.3% vs 23.3%, P < .01) and a longer hospital stay than group A (median, 72 days vs 28 days, P < .03). When complications were classified as major or minor, only minor complications showed a significant difference (30% vs 13.7%, P = .05). After using biliary stricture dilatation and stone extraction, the rate of residual stones in the right lobe was similar in both groups, but patients in group B had a significantly higher rate of residual stones (12.5% vs 0%, P < .02) and stone recurrence in the left lobe (19% vs 0%, P < .003) than those in group A. CONCLUSIONS: Partial resection of the left lobe in cases of bilateral hepatolithiasis and biliary strictures can effectively simplify problems in the treatment of bilateral hepatolithiasis and intrahepatic biliary strictures. In addition, not only were surgical complications not increased, but a decrease in complications from postoperative manipulations for stone clearance was noted in our series.
BACKGROUND: The addition of splenectomy to a gastrointestinal (GI) operation may have an adverse effect on mortality, morbidity, and even survival. OBJECTIVE: To determine the risks of the converse: synchronous GI surgery appended to splenectomy for hematologic diseases. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Multiple hospitals comprising an affiliated surgical training program. PATIENTS: Consecutive sample of 207 adults (mean age, 49 years) with splenectomies for hematologic diseases. INTERVENTION: Splenectomy and concomitant GI or biliary surgery (group 1, n=19) and splenectomy alone (group 2, n=188). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Length of hospital or intensive care unit stay, later operations, postoperative infections, postoperative abdominal abscess, major complications, and death. RESULTS: Preoperative and intraoperative factors were similar in both groups. Operative mortality was 3 of 19 in group 1 and 8 of 188 in group 2 (p=.07). The mean number of major complications tended to be higher in group 1 (1.5 vs 0.5, P=07). Despite no difference between the incidences of overall postoperative infections, patients in group 1 were much more likely to develop an abdominal abscess (4 of 19 vs 3 of 188, P=.002). Logistic regression established that patients undergoing splenectomy and synchronous GI or biliary surgery were 25 times more likely to develop an intra-abdominal abscess than were patients with splenectomy alone, even controlling for confounding factors (odds ratio, 24.7; 95% confidence interval, 3.1 to 196; P=.002). CONCLUSIONS: Synchronous GI or biliary surgery with splenectomy for hematologic disease increases the risk of intra-abdominal abscess and should be avoided. Complication and mortality rates may also be increased.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.