PubMed · 7623894
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M Roubicek. 1995-08-24. Jumping genes.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7623894/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
During meiosis, crossovers occur at a high level, but the level of noncrossover recombinants is even higher. The biological rationale for the existence of the latter events is not known. It has been suggested that a noncrossover-specific pathway exists specifically to mediate chromosome pairing. Using a physical assay that monitors both crossovers and noncrossovers in cultures of yeast undergoing synchronous meiosis, we find that both types of products appear at essentially the same time, after chromosomes are fully synapsed at pachytene. We have also analyzed a situation in which commitment to meiotic recombination and formation of the synaptonemal complex are coordinately suppressed (mer1 versus mer1 MER2++). We find that suppression is due primarily to restoration of meiosis-specific double-strand breaks, a characteristic of the major meiotic recombination pathway. Taken together, the observations presented suggest that there probably is no noncrossover-specific pathway and that restoration of intermediate events in a single pairing/recombination pathway promotes synaptonemal complex formation. The biological significant of noncrossover recombination remains to be determined, however.
Frequent tandem amplification of defined regions of the genome, called amplicons, is a common characteristic in the genomes of some Rhizobium species, such as Rhizobium etli. In order to map these zones in a model Rhizobium replicon, we undertook an analysis of the plasticity patterns fostered by amplicons in the pSym (390 kb) of R. etli CFN42. Data presented in this article indicate the presence of four amplicons in pSym, used for the generation of tandem amplifications and deletions. The amplicons are large, ranging from 90 to 175 kb, and they are overlapping. Each amplicon is usually flanked by specific reiterated sequences. Formation of amplifications and deletions requires an active recA gene. All the amplicons detected are concentrated in a zone of roughly one-third of pSym, covering most of the symbiotic genes detected in this plasmid. No amplicons were detected in the remaining two-thirds of pSym. These data support the idea that most of the known symbiotic genes in this plasmid are located in a genomic region that is prone to the formation of frequent tandem amplification.
Alternative models for break-induced recombination predict different distributions of primary products. The double-stranded break-repair model predicts a noncrossover product and equimolar amounts of two crossover products. The one-end pairing model predicts two crossover products, but not necessarily in equimolar amounts, and the single-stranded annealing model predicts deletion of the fragment between the pairing sequences. Depending on the structure of the recombining substrate(s) and the nature of the resectioning step that precedes strand annealing, the single-stranded annealing mechanism would yield only one or both crossover products. We tested these predictions for the RecE recombination pathway of Escherichia coli. Nonreplicating intramolecular recombination substrates with a double-stranded break (DSB) within one copy of a direct repeat were released from chimera lambda phage by in vivo restriction, and the distribution of primary circular recombination products was determined. Noncrossover products were barely detectable, and the molar ratio of the two crossover products was proportional to the length ratio of the homologous ends flanking the DSB. These results suggest an independent pairing of each end with the intact homolog and argue against the double-stranded break-repair model. However, the results do not distinguish alternative pairing mechanisms (strand invasion and strand annealing). The kinetics of heteroduplex formation and heteroduplex strand polarity were investigated. Immediately following the DSB induction, heteroduplex formation was done by pairing the strands ending 3' at the break. A slow accumulation of the complementary heteroduplex made by the pairing of the strands ending 5' at the break (5' heteroduplexes) was observed at a larger stage. The observed bias in heteroduplex strand polarity depended on DSB induction at a specific site. The 5' heteroduplexes may have been generated by reciprocal strand exchange, pairing that is not strand specific, or strand-specific pairing induced at random breaks.