Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 7493702

Breech presentation in Spain, 1992: a collaborative study.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goals of the present work were to study the incidence of breech deliveries in Spain, the causes for breech presentation and its management and the incidence of cesarean sections and its correlation with the perinatal mortality rates among different centers. STUDY DESIGN: Data from 102,038 deliveries, 3829 of which were singleton breech deliveries attended in 1992, were obtained from 40 hospital centers located in different autonomic communities of Spain and analyzed using a computer statistical package (R-sigma, Horus Hardware). RESULTS: The incidence of breech deliveries was 3.8%, although this proportion varied between different centers and regions. Up to 18% of the cases occurred in preterm. The most frequent causes were prematurity and uterine malformations. In its management, an increase in the tendency to perform elective cesarean section was noticed. The incidence of cesarean sections reached 14.9% of the total and 67.9% in breech deliveries. Perinatal mortality rate in breech deliveries was more than four times that of all deliveries, according to national standards, and more than three times according to international standards (47.8 versus 11.8 x 1000, and 24.7 versus 8 x 1000, respectively). The intrapartum and neonatal mortality in breech deliveries was 13 x 1000. No correlation between incidence of cesarean sections and perinatal mortality rates was found. Primiparity, deflexed head, macrosomia and prematurity were the most decisive parameters to indicate a cesarean section. Neither the external cephalic version nor the total breech extraction were common procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of breech deliveries is variable between different centers (1.7%-5.1%) and Spanish regions (3.3%-4.3%), with a mean of 3.8% in overall and 11.4% in preterm deliveries. There is a tendency to perform cesarean sections, especially in primiparae. There is no correlation between the percentage of cesarean sections in each center and the perinatal mortality rate. External cephalic version and total breech extraction were uncommon procedures.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Acién. 1995. Breech presentation in Spain, 1992: a collaborative study.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-2115(95)02166-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Is there a role for X-ray pelvimetry in the twenty-first century?].

The purpose of this article was to perform a critical analysis of publications having estimated the utility of X-ray pelvimetry, in order to allow tangible and useful conclusions for the clinical practice. X-ray pelvimetry was proposed in 3 indications: trial of labour among patients with a history of caesarean section, breech presentation, suspicion of cephalopelvic disproportion. The large majority of these publications are retrospective studies, studying a low number of patients and especially without control groups or randomisation. Their contradictory results and their methodological weaknesses do not allow any conclusion. Published randomised trials are exceptional. Among patients with a history of caesarean section, there is only one randomised trial; it demonstrates that ante-partum X-ray pelvimetry is not necessary prior to a trial labour in women with one previous caesarean section. It increases the caesarean section rate and is a poor predictor of the outcome of labour. There is also only one randomised trial which evaluated the interest of X-ray pelvimetry in patients with a breech presentation: the use of pelvimetry in breech presentation at term does not significantly reduce the overall caesarean-section rate, and does not improve the neonatal issues. However, it allows better selection of the delivery route, with a significantly lower emergency Caesarean-section rate. Finally, the only one randomised trial having studied the utility of X-ray pelvimetry for the prediction of cephalopelvic disproportion shows that pelvimetry is a poor predictor of the outcome of labour, has no influence on the neonatal issues and increases the caesarean sections rate. Furthermore, although radiation exposure during a X-ray pelvimetry is very weak, diagnostic X-ray studies during any stage of gestation have been shown to increase the risk of childhood cancer in the irradiated fetus. In the rare cases where pelvimetry is useful (trial of labour with a breech presentation), it is thus careful to perform a MRI pelvimetry.

Breech Presentation↗

French trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology theoretical training and practice of vaginal breech delivery: a national survey.

OBJECTIVE: To survey French trainees in Obstetrics and Gynaecology and evaluate their theoretical training and practice of vaginal breech delivery (VBD). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a national survey between January and April 2004 among the 817 French trainees undergoing a 5-year training program in obstetrics and gynaecology. Trainees in years 1-3 were considered as juniors, and those in years 4 and 5 as seniors. Respondents were invited to specify whether they had received theoretical teaching in the management of VBD, and to indicate the number of VBDs they had performed during their training. RESULTS: The questionnaire was returned by 156 (19%) trainees and of these 140 questionnaires were suitable for analysis. Overall, 35% of the respondents had never been taught the management of a VBD. Among the senior trainees, 33% had performed less than four VBDs, and 23% had not received any teaching on how to manage a VBD. CONCLUSION: The level of theoretical training and practice in the management of VBD seems to have diminished and does not bring the French trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology to the required standard of competence.

Breech Presentation↗