Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 7280202

Ankle arthrography.

Abstract

Ankle arthrography allows radiologists to assess accurately the degree of damage caused by ankle sprains. Ankle sprains are a significant problem to a large number of people, particularly those who participate in sports. Proper care of these ankle injuries requires the combined expertise of many disciplines. Radiologists should be aware of the significance of these lesions and utilize all modalities, including plain films, stress films, and ankle arthrograms, when indicated, to obtain the exact pathologic diagnosis of severe sprains. The primary role of arthrography is to separate those patients who have moderate or severe sprains that may require surgery from those who will respond to more conservative therapy. Many orthopedists believe that combined lateral ligament tears, or any tear involving the deltoid ligament and perhaps the interosseous ligament, may require surgery. At the other end of the spectrum of ankle sprains, occasionally, one may not be able to distinguish between a very slight sprain and a more severe sprain with rupture of the ankle ligament. This is an important distinction, particularly in young athletes who would like to continue to play a competitive sport despite their injury. Utilizing arthrography, the orthopedic surgeon can suggest a more accurate prognosis as to whether the patient might be able to participate with proper taping. Obviously, if the patient has ruptured a ligament, it is not in the best interest of the patient to participate in a competitive sport without allowing a proper interval for healing. I heartily recommend arthrography of the ankle to any radiologist who is not yet utilizing this procedure. I believe that it can add significantly to the care of those patients who sustain ankle sprains.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R W Olson. 1981. Ankle arthrography.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7280202/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and impact of introducing the Ottawa ankle rules to a large number of physicians in a wide variety of hospital and community settings over a prolonged period of time. DESIGN: Multicentre before and after controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Emergency departments of eight teaching and community hospitals in Canadian communities (population 10,000 to 3,000,000). SUBJECTS: All 12,777 adults (6288 control, 6489 intervention) seen with acute ankle injuries during two 12 month periods before and after the intervention. INTERVENTION: More than 200 physicians of varying experience were taught to order radiography according to the Ottawa ankle rules. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Referral for ankle and foot radiography. RESULTS: There were significant reductions in use of ankle radiography at all eight hospitals and within a priori subgroups: for all hospitals combined 82.8% control v 60.9% intervention(P < 0.001); for community hospitals 86.7% v 61.7%; (P < 0.001); for teaching hospitals 77.9% v 59.9%; (P < 0.001); for emergency physicians 82.1% v 61.6%; (P < 0.001); for family physicians 84.3% v 60.1%; (P < 0.001); and for housestaff 82.3% v 60.1%; (P < 0.001). Compared with patients without fracture who had radiography during the intervention period those who had no radiography spent less time in the emergency department (54.0 v 86.9 minutes; P < 0.001) and had lower medical charges ($70.20 v $161.60; P < 0.001). There was no difference in the rate of fractures diagnosed after discharge from the emergency department (0.5 v 0.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of the Ottawa ankle rules proved to be feasible in a large variety of hospital and community settings. Use of the rules over a prolonged period of time by many physicians of varying experience led to a decrease in ankle radiography, waiting times, and costs without an increased rate of missed fractures. The multiphase methodological approach used to develop and implement these rules may be applied to other clinical problems.

Ankle Injuries