Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 7231972

[Hinged wrench].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

V I Chaplygin. 1981. [Hinged wrench].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7231972/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Traditional methods vs rigid internal fixation of mandible fractures.

OBJECTIVE: To compare traditional methods (ie, intermaxillary fixation with interosseous wiring or external fixation) with newer techniques (ie, plating, use of lag screws) of open reduction and fixation of mandible fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data from medical records. SETTING: Academic urban medical center. PATIENTS: Nonrandomized sample of 356 patients admitted to the hospital for treatment of mandible fractures from 1987 through 1991; 155 patients treated with open reduction and fixation were studied. INTERVENTIONS: Sixty-nine patients were treated with interosseous wire fixation or external fixation, 86 patients with rigid internal fixation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence of infection, nerve impairment, nonunion, malunion, operative time, and follow-up. RESULTS: No significant difference was noted between the two groups for sex, treating service, delay in presentation, antibiotic coverage, mechanism of injury, or type of fracture. The incidence of infection, nerve injury, and unavailability for follow-up were greater in patients treated by the newer techniques. Overall expense and operative time were greater in the group treated with plates and lag screws. CONCLUSIONS: We advocate traditional techniques for patients with mandible fractures requiring open reduction and fixation.

Bone Plates

[The "inserted" condylar plate].

Twelve extensive segmental and comminuted fractures of the femur affecting the metaphyseal areas (7 times proximal, 5 times distal) and the diaphysis were treated with extremely long condylar plates (16 to 20 holes). The condylar plates were inserted via a proximal and a distal incision leaving the Musculus vastus lateralis intact at the fracture site in all cases. Following standard preparation of the blade position using the seating chisel, the condylar plate was inserted behind the musculus vastus lateralis with the blade pointing towards the surgeon. The condyles or the trochanteric area were tilted slightly and the plate was turned 180 degrees and driven home. No screws were inserted in the area of the fracture, in particular, lag screws were not used. Ten out of 12 fractures healed without problems, in 2 cases bone grafting was necessary. Three main observations resulted from analysis of the operations and subsequent clinical and radiographical assessments. In the presence of relatively intact soft tissue covering, an astonishingly good reduction of the fragments was achieved after restoration of leg length and extension. In the healing process, callus formed rapidly and provided medial support. The bone structure was found to be more homogeneous than in the case for plate fixation involving several screws at the fracture site around which considerable fluctuations in bone density frequently occur. The application of condylar plates behind the musculus vastus lateralis by only proximal and distal incision for osteosyntheses of extensive multifragmental fractures is a further development of bridge-plating and can be recommended for long fractures.

Bone Plates