Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7112068

[The Glasgow coma scale].

J Berney
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The value of the Glasgow coma scale is definite and widely accepted. It is a help in teaching a difficult subject, in mutual understanding in a few words, and in comparison of cases. It uses accurate and practical observations. It is the best method of measuring the state of consciousness, provided observation of the diameter and light reaction of the pupils is added It avoids what Jamieson and Yelland feared in 1968. "It is tragic if the wardmaid assesses deterioration by recognizing that a patient is not as bright now as earlier while trained staff await the development of the next stage in their preconceived, rigid scale of deterioration."

Explore related subjects

ComaEye MovementsHumansMovementReflex, PupillarySpeechEnglish AbstractJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Berney. 1982-07-06. [The Glasgow coma scale].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7112068/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Predicting coma and other low responsive patients outcome using event-related brain potentials: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: A meta-analysis was performed to estimate the predictive power (odd ratio, OR) for awakening of auditory event-related potential (ERP) components in low responsive patients with stroke or hemorrhage, trauma, anoxic, post-operative, and metabolic encephalopathy etiologies. METHODS: We reviewed MEDLINE and analyzed citations for retrieved articles. Logistic regressions were applied on patient samples (Glasgow Coma Scale <12) across and for separate etiologies. RESULTS: For stroke and hemorrhage the ORs with 95% confidence intervals were: 2.05 [1.12-3.75] (N100), 4.47 [1.92-10.44] (MMN), 10.29 [2.00-52.79] (P300), for trauma: 1.63 [0.70-3.80] (N100), 4.72 [1.35-16.44] (MMN), 12.89 [4.82-34.43] (P300), anoxic: 8.03 [2.83-22.75] (N100), 15.50 [4.27-56.26] (MMN), 5.93 [2.38-14.77] (P300), post-operative: 10.66 [1.98-57.50] (N100), metabolic encephalopathy: 2.12 [0.34-13.13] (N100), 3.60 [0.28-46.36] (MMN), 7.71 [0.75-79.77] (P300), and all etiologies: 2.85 [1.91-4.27] (N100), 6.53 [3.55-12.01] (MMN), and 8.79 [4.88-15.83] (P300). Based on six N100 studies (N=548 patients), five MMN studies (N=470), and six P300 studies (N=313), the N100, MMN, or P300, when present, significantly predicted awakening, P300 and MMN being significantly better predictors than N100. CONCLUSIONS: The MMN and P300 appear to be reliable predictors of awakening. SIGNIFICANCE: The prognostic assessment of low responsive patients with auditory ERP should take into account both MMN and P300.

Coma↗