PubMed · 7108917
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
R Cruz-Coke. 1982. Nomogram for estimating specific consanguinity risks.. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.19.3.216
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
PURPOSE: To determine the molecular diagnostic yield, variant spectrum, inheritance architecture, and influence of consanguinity on whole-exome sequencing outcomes in a South Indian retinitis pigmentosa (RP) cohort. DESIGN: Prospective, registry-based cohort study. SUBJECTS: A total of 113 affected participants were enrolled through the Aravind Registry for Inherited Diseases of the Eye, including 109 unrelated probands and 4 affected relatives from already represented families. Primary analyses were restricted to the 109 unrelated probands. METHODS: Whole-exome sequencing was performed using a clinical exome workflow. Variants were interpreted using American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology criteria and cases were categorized as solved, possibly solved, inconclusive, or unsolved using prespecified inheritance-aware rules. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Molecular diagnostic yield, distribution of implicated genes and variant classes, inheritance architecture, and diagnostic yield stratified by consanguinity status. RESULTS: Among the 109 unrelated probands, mean age at testing was 39.3 ± 14.1 years and 58.7% were male. Whole-exome sequencing identified 186 distinct rare variants across 92 inherited retinal disease genes, including 26 pathogenic and 33 likely pathogenic variants. A molecular diagnosis was established in 50 of 109 probands (45.9%), including 42 solved and 8 possibly solved cases; 45 (41.3%) were inconclusive and 14 (12.8%) remained unsolved, including 4 (3.7%) in whom no candidate variant was identified. EYS, USH2A, and ADGRV1 were the most frequently implicated genes. Autosomal recessive (AR) disease predominated (44/50, 88.0%). Consanguineous AR cases were exclusively homozygous (17/17); notably, 68.0% of nonconsanguineous AR cases were also homozygous (P = 0.013). Diagnostic yield was higher in consanguineous probands (51.4% vs. 41.7%), without reaching significance. Recurrent alleles included an established South Asian founder variant (MFSD8 c.1361T>C) and candidate founder alleles in EYS (c.4321C>T) and ADGRV1 (c.14329C>T). CONCLUSIONS: Whole-exome sequencing established a molecular diagnosis in nearly half of this South Indian RP cohort and revealed a predominantly recessive, homozygosity-enriched architecture shaped by consanguinity. These findings define a region-specific variant landscape to support clinical interpretation, genetic counseling, and future trial enrollment in this underrepresented population. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES: The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The authors analyse the experiences of their Genetic Counseling Clinic between 1979-1992. They show the formation of the motives of presenting and consulting. They range the consultants in three etiological categories (genetical, teratological and clinical entities). The proportion of new consultants increased fourfold and this tendency documents unambiguously the claim of family planners for this very important medical service. The proportion of Mendelian disorders, mutagen risk and consanguinity are relatively continuous. Because of teratogen risk the rate of presenting decreased moderately. The proportion of consultants shows a definite increase of multifactorial frequent disorders, which they value as a favorable tendency. For decreasing of unjustified cases they suggest the necessity of pre-screening.