Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Risk”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Epidemiologic analyses of risk factors, risk indicators, risk markers, and causal factors. The example of albuminuria and the risk of cardiovascular disease in diabetes.

Much of the practice of modern medicine deals with prevention of the consequences of chronic conditions, including diabetes, hypertension, obesity, asthma, chronic bronchitis, and inflammatory bowel diseases. To achieve this end, identifying people at risk for these consequences and then initiating the appropriate, evidence-based preventive therapies are key. Characterization and study of risk factors are at the core of this effort and represent the only way that high-risk individuals can be identified. These risk factors can be any imagined variable, ranging from a genetic mutation to a blood result, a previous disease, exposure to an infectious agent or toxin, a socioeconomic state, ethnicity, birth weight, or country of origin. All causal factors for an outcome are risk factors for that outcome; reducing these risk factors almost certainly reduces the outcome. The converse is usually not true, however: identification of a risk factor reveals little about its causal connection to the outcome in question, and reducing this risk factor may or may not reduce the outcome. Once high-risk individuals are identified on the basis of their risk factor profile, the relevant clinical question relates to which therapies have been identified clearly that will reduce the risk or the outcome. If modification of the level of the risk factor is considered therapeutically, the question of whether the risk factor is also a good surrogate outcome must be answered. Information regarding whether the risk factor causes the disease is highly desirable; however, it is often unavailable and is not required before making therapeutic decisions.

Albuminuria↗

University of North Carolina Caries Risk Assessment Study: comparisons of high risk prediction, any risk prediction, and any risk etiologic models.

The purpose of this analysis is to compare three different statistical models for predicting children likely to be at risk of developing dental caries over a 3-yr period. Data are based on 4117 children who participated in the University of North Carolina Caries Risk Assessment Study, a longitudinal study conducted in the Aiken, South Carolina, and Portland, Maine areas. The three models differed with respect to either the types of variables included or the definition of disease outcome. The two "Prediction" models included both risk factor variables thought to cause dental caries and indicator variables that are associated with dental caries, but are not thought to be causal for the disease. The "Etiologic" model included only etiologic factors as variables. A dichotomous outcome measure--none or any 3-yr increment, was used in the "Any Risk Etiologic model" and the "Any Risk Prediction Model". Another outcome, based on a gradient measure of disease, was used in the "High Risk Prediction Model". The variables that are significant in these models vary across grades and sites, but are more consistent among the Etiologic model than the Predictor models. However, among the three sets of models, the Any Risk Prediction Models have the highest sensitivity and positive predictive values, whereas the High Risk Prediction Models have the highest specificity and negative predictive values. Considerations in determining model preference are discussed.

Child↗

Underlying risk factors incrementally add to the standard risk estimate in detecting subclinical atherosclerosis in low- and intermediate-risk middle-aged asymptomatic individuals.

BACKGROUND: Traditional risk factors predict the 10-year risk of developing coronary heart disease (CHD). Underlying risk factors like physical inactivity, obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2), and family history of premature CHD are independently associated with CHD. High burden of coronary artery calcification (CAC) on electron beam tomography (EBT) is a CHD risk equivalent. GOALS: To determine the association between CAC and traditional risk assessment and whether the presence of added underlying risk factors is associated with advanced CAC in low- and intermediate-risk individuals. METHODS: After excluding patients with CHD, we studied 8549 asymptomatic individuals referred for EBT for cardiac risk assessment. Traditional myocardial infarction risk score was estimated according to Framingham criteria, and individuals were divided into 3 groups: low-risk (< or =9% MI risk over the next 10 years), intermediate-risk (10%-20% risk), and high-risk (>20 % risk). Advanced CAC was defined as a calcium score > or =75th percentile based on sex and age. RESULTS: The prevalence of advanced CAC was 20% in low-risk, 27% in intermediate-risk, and 31% in high-risk individuals (P < .001). Underlying risk factors were incrementally associated with advanced CAC in low- and intermediate-risk individuals (P < .001). A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that addition of underlying risk factors to traditional risk assessment increased the area under the curve significantly from 0.56 to 0.62 (P < .001). CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of low- and intermediate-risk individuals have advanced CAC. Adding family history, obesity, and physical inactivity to traditional risk assessment improves prediction of advanced CAC, which may lead these individuals to be treated more aggressively at an earlier age.

Calcinosis↗

Risk stratification by guidelines compared with risk assessment by risk equations applied to a MONICA sample.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension (WHO/ISH) Hypertension Guidelines from 1999 propose a risk stratification scheme for estimating absolute risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Risk equations estimated by statistical methods are another way of predicting cardiovascular risk. OBJECTIVE: We studied the differences between these two approaches when applied to the same set of individuals with high blood pressure. DESIGN AND METHODS: The two northernmost counties in Sweden (NSW) constitute one of the centres in the WHO MONICA (monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease) Project. Three population surveys have been carried out in 1986, 1990 and 1994, and were used to estimate a risk equation for predicting the 10-year risk of fatal/non-fatal stroke and myocardial infarction. Another MONICA sample from 1999, a total of 5997 subjects, was classified according to the recent WHO/ISH risk stratification scheme. A risk assessment was also performed, by using the risk equations from the NSW MONICA sample and Framingham risk equations. RESULTS: The agreement between the two methods was good when the values obtained from the risk equation were averaged for each risk group obtained from the risk classification by guidelines. However, if the predicted risk for each individual was considered, the agreement was poor for the medium and high-risk groups. Although the average risk for all individuals is the same, many subjects have a higher risk or a lower risk than predicted by guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Risk classification by the 1999 WHO/ISH Hypertension Guidelines is not accurate and detailed enough for medium- and high-risk patients, which could be of clinical importance in the medium risk group.

Adult↗

Stratification of intermediate-risk endometrial cancer patients into groups at high risk or low risk for recurrence based on tumor gene expression profiles.

PURPOSE: Endometrial cancers classified as "intermediate risk" based on clinical and/or pathologic features are associated with a 15% to 20% risk of recurrence. Here, we test whether global gene expression profiling can distinguish intermediate-risk tumors into high-risk and low-risk subgroups. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Tumor specimens were obtained from 75 intermediate-risk endometrial cancer patients, 13 who had recurred and 62 who had not recurred with a median follow-up of 24 months. Gene expression profiles were obtained using the Affymetrix U133A GeneChip oligonucleotide microarray. The genes most associated with risk of recurrence were used to create a risk score using a leave-one-out cross-validation method and the univariate Cox proportional hazards regression model. Time to recurrence curves for the high-risk and low-risk subgroups were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference in time to recurrence between these two subgroups was tested using the log-rank test. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in time to recurrence between high-risk and low-risk patients using risk scores as defined above (P = 0.04). The estimated hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) was 3.07 (1.00-9.43). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with intermediate-risk endometrial cancers identified as high-risk for recurrence according to a gene expression-based risk score have a significantly increased risk for recurrence compared with those classified as low risk. These findings suggest that gene expression profiling can potentially contribute to the clinical classification and management of intermediate-risk endometrial cancers.

Aged↗

[Usefulness of TIMI Risk Score in assessing the prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST elevation assigned to early percutaneous coronary intervention. Comparison of the high-risk and the moderate-risk patients].

Risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) without ST segment elevation plays an important role in choosing treatment strategy and making further prognosis. We aimed at 1) assessing the usefulness of TIMI Risk Score in risk stratification and prognosis in unselected patients with ACS without ST elevation who underwent early percutaneous revascularization, 2) comparing the frequency of adverse events (death, MI, repeat revascularization in high-risk and moderate-risk patients during 14 days from revascularization, 3) comparing the efficacy of percutaneous revascularization in the high-risk and in the moderate-risk group. High-risk (TIMI Risk Score > or = 5 points) and moderate-risk (TIMI Risk Score 3-4 points) group comprised 324 and 240 patients respectively. High-risk group comprised older patients, fewer men, more diabetics and hypertensive patients. Peripheral vessel disease and prior MI was also more frequent in the high-risk group. More high-risk patients had initial TIMI flow < 3 in target vessel, as well TIMI 3 flow after revascularization was achieved in fewer high-risk patients. During 14-day follow-up the frequency of combined end-point (death, MI, repeat revascularization) was more frequent in the high-risk group (8.95% vs 1.67%). TIMI Risk Score is an easy to use and useful method in risk stratification and prediction of adverse events in patients with ACS without ST segment elevation assigned to early percutaneous intervention in the early post-procedure period.

Acute Disease↗

Individuals' cardiovascular risk profile projected by family doctors and individuals' knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors: a challenge for primary prevention. The cardiovascular risk prevention project "Help Your Heart Stay Young".

BACKGROUND: Whether the practice of family doctors of assessing individuals' cardiovascular risk profile improves individuals' knowledge of risk factors in primary prevention has not been established. Accordingly, we evaluated patients' knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors and lifestyle in healthy subjects whose family doctors provided individual cardiovascular risk score. METHODS: Subjects who visited their family doctor in a time frame of 3 months, who accepted to fill-in a simple questionnaire measuring their knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors and of non-pharmacological interventions able to reduce cardiovascular risk were evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty-one family doctors were involved. The study sample comprised 4239 subjects (mean age 56 +/- 9 years, 62% women) in primary prevention. They were classified by their family doctors, based on the Framingham algorithm, as being at low (< 10%; 45.7% of subjects), medium (10-20%; 38.7% of subjects) or moderate-to-high (> 20%; 15.6% of subjects) cardiovascular risk. The prevalence of obese subjects (40, 48, and 49%, respectively) and of heavy smokers (> or = 20 cigarettes/day; 26, 30, and 34%) increased from the low to the moderate-to-high risk group (both p < 0.05). The proportion of subjects unaware of personal history of arterial hypertension (5, 6, and 9%) and that of subjects who were unaware of history of elevated cholesterol levels (10, 11, and 12%, both p < 0.01) increased with higher cardiovascular risk score. The proportion of subjects self-reporting blood pressure > 135/85 mmHg, but self-reporting being normotensive (30, 50, and 52%), and the proportion of subjects who referred cholesterol levels > 200 mg/dl among those who self-referred not to have elevated cholesterol levels (13, 25, and 31%) increased both with cardiovascular risk category (p < 0.001). The proportion of subjects who were unaware of their personal history of diabetes was similar in the cardiovascular risk groups. The prevalence of low educational level was higher (56, 58, and 62%, p < 0.01) and the level of knowledge of non-pharmacological remedies to cardiovascular risk factors (63, 61, and 59%, p < 0.01) was lower in higher cardiovascular risk score group. Subjects aged < 55 years showed similar lack of knowledge about cardiovascular risk factors and the proportion of heavy smoking was as high as in the group of older participants. CONCLUSIONS: In cardiovascular primary prevention, the projection of higher individuals' risk profile by family doctors was not paralleled by an increase in individual's knowledge of major cardiovascular risk factors and of lifestyle interventions able to reduce the cardiovascular risk.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗

Is the Framingham risk function valid for northern European populations? A comparison of methods for estimating absolute coronary risk in high risk men.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the validity of estimates of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk by the Framingham risk function, for European populations. DESIGN: Comparison of CHD risk estimates for individuals derived from the Framingham, prospective cardiovascular Münster (PROCAM), Dundee, and British regional heart (BRHS) risk functions. SETTING: Sheffield Hypertension Clinic. Patients-206 consecutive hypertensive men aged 35-75 years without preexisting vascular disease. RESULTS: There was close agreement among the Framingham, PROCAM, and Dundee risk functions for average CHD risk. For individuals the best correlation was between Framingham and PROCAM, both of which use high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. When Framingham was used to target a CHD event rate > 3% per year, it identified men with mean CHD risk by PROCAM of 4.6% per year and all had CHD event risks > 1.5% per year. Men at lower risk by Framingham had a mean CHD risk by PROCAM of 1.5% per year, with 16% having a CHD event risk > 3.0% per year. BRHS risk function estimates of CHD risk were fourfold lower than those for the other three risk functions, but with moderate correlations, suggesting an important systematic error. CONCLUSION: There is close agreement between the Framingham, PROCAM, and Dundee risk functions as regards average CHD risk, and moderate agreement for estimates within individuals. Taking PROCAM as the external standard, the Framingham function separates high and low CHD risk groups and is acceptably accurate for northern European populations, at least in men.

Adult↗

[Cardiovascular risk percentiles avoid overestimation or underestimation of risk calculated by the SCORE risk function].

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular risk evaluation is of the utmost importance for treatment of patients with cardiovascular risk factors. There are various scales or equations and they can be adapted to a particular population to try to avoid over or under estimation of risk. We propose risk percentiles as a new method of adapting risk scoring systems to our population. METHODS: A cross sectional study of the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in the province of Palencia (ERVPA: Cardiovascular Risk Study in Palencia) was conducted. Age, gender, blood pressure, total cholesterol, tobacco consumption and diabetes were evaluated. 514 subjects aged 20 - 79 taken from the general population were studied in 9 health centers from Palencia (Spain). Fatal cardiovascular risk was measured with SCORE project equations. Percentiles were calculated and compared to both equations and a Spearman's correlation coefficient and a kappa agreement coefficient were calculated. RESULTS: The percentages of high risk range from 0% in young subjects to 92% in males over the age of 70 and 67% in females over the age of 70. The concordance with high risk country equations has a kappa coefficient of 0.741. Concordance varies greatly with age and gender. On comparing the percentiles, the concordance between both equations is almost absolute. CONCLUSIONS: Adopting risk percentiles as a method of cardiovascular risk evaluation permits us to adapt any risk equation to a particular area and avoids underestimation or overestimation of risk. Risk percentiles allow us to extrapolate absolute risk for any age.

Adult↗

Suicide risk and violence risk in alcoholics. Predictors of aggressive risk.

The purposes of the study were: a) to examine whether risk for suicide and risk for violence were positively or negatively correlated; and b) to investigate potential predictors/mediators of suicide risk alone, violence risk alone, and risk for both suicide and violence. Suicide risk and violence risk were considered outcome variables. The predictor/mediator variables were eight ego defense mechanisms and 13 dysfunctional personality styles (both have been linked to aggressive risk). Seventy-four male alcoholics were administered questionnaire measures of suicide risk and violence risk, defenses, and disordered personality functioning. Results indicated that suicide and violence risk were significantly positively correlated. Three sets of predictor/mediator variables were identified: those predicting violence risk alone, those predicting suicide risk alone, and those predicting combined aggressive risk (risk for both suicide and violence). Connections obtained between predictor/mediator variables and outcome variables were explained in the context of existent clinical theory.

Adult↗

Risk factors that discriminate 'high- risk' from 'low-risk' Japanese patients with coronary artery disease.

Although various risk factors have been implicated in the progression of coronary artery disease (CAD), coronary risk factors specifically related to the long-term prognosis for high-risk CAD have not been determined. The study enrolled 311 consecutive Japanese patients with CAD who underwent diagnostic coronary arteriography and divided them into 2 groups: (i) 135 high-risk patients with either impaired left ventricular function (ejection fraction <50%) or multivessel disease and (ii) 176 low-risk patients with normal left ventricular function and 0- or 1-vessel disease. The prevalence of risk factors including age, gender, smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), obesity and lipid variables were compared between the 2 groups. The prevalence of DM, a serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol level below 35 mg/dl and a serum lipoprotein (Lp) (a) level above 25 mg/dl was significantly higher in the high-risk group as compared with the low-risk group. Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that DM (odds ratio (OR): 1.72, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.02-2.92, p<0.05), a low HDL-cholesterol level (OR: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.49-4.17, p<0.001) and a high Lp(a) level (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.02-2.76, p<0.05) were all independent risk factors for high-risk CAD. However, if the patients with 0-vessel disease were excluded from the low-risk group, a low HDL-cholesterol level was found to be the only independent predictor for high-risk CAD (OR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.15-3.70, p<0.05). Among both men and smokers in this population, a higher Lp(a) level was found to be a significant predictor for high-risk CAD. A low serum level of HDL-cholesterol, a high serum level of Lp(a) and DM were significant predictors of high-risk in patients with CAD. Among patients with a significant coronary stenosis or left ventricular dysfunction, a low serum level of HDL-cholesterol was the only significant predictor for high-risk CAD.

Aged↗

How making a risk estimate can change the feel of that risk: shifting attitudes toward breast cancer risk in a general public survey.

Counseling women about breast cancer risks has been found to decrease screening compliance. We investigated whether women's reactions to risk information are an artifact of requiring women to estimate the risk of breast cancer prior to receiving risk information. Three hundred and fifty-six women were randomized to either make or not make a risk estimate prior to receiving risk information. Outcome measures were participants' estimates of the average woman's breast cancer risk and their emotional response to the risk information. Women overestimated the lifetime risk of breast cancer (M = 46%). Women who made risk estimates felt more relieved about the risk and perceived the risk as being lower than women who did not make estimates (p's < 0.001). Asking people to estimate risks influenced their subsequent perceptions of the risk of breast cancer.

Adolescent↗

Cardiovascular disease risk factor knowledge in young adults and 10-year change in risk factors: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study.

This study's objective was assessment of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor knowledge in young adults, its association with 10-year changes in risk factor levels, and variables related to risk factor knowledge. A total of 4,193 healthy persons (55% female, 48% Black; mean age=30 years) from four urban US communities were queried about risk factor knowledge in 1990-1991 and were reexamined in 2000-2001. Of six risk factors considered (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, overweight, sedentary lifestyle, and unhealthy diet), participants mentioned a mean of two; more than 65% were not aware of any risk factors, and less than 35% recognized being overweight as a risk factor. After adjustment, variables associated with mentioning more than two CVD risk factors versus one or fewer were Black race (OR=0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44, 0.61), having a high school education or less (OR=0.88, 95% CI: 0.80, 0.95), having one or two (vs. zero) risk factors (OR=1.27, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.53), and having three or more (vs. zero) risk factors (OR=1.79, 95% CI: 1.35, 2.38). More knowledge was marginally associated with less increase in body mass index 10 years later (p=0.06) but was unrelated to other risk factor changes. Knowledge of CVD risk factors was very low in these young adults but increased with the presence of risk factors. Knowledge alone did not predict 10-year changes in risk factors.

Adult↗

Cardiovascular disease risk factors and preventive practices among adults--United States, 1994: a behavioral risk factor atlas. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System State Coordinators.

UNLABELLED: PROBLEM/CONDITIONS: Cardiovascular disease (CVD), including coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke, is the leading cause of death in the United States, and state rates of CVD vary by state and by region of the country. Several behavioral risk factors (i.e., overweight, physical inactivity, smoking, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus) and preventive practices (i.e., weight loss and smoking cessation) are associated with the development of CVD and also vary geographically. This summary displays and analyzes geographic variation in the prevalences of selected CVD risk factors. REPORTING PERIOD: 1994 (1992 for prevalence of hypertension). DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEM: The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) is a state-based random-digit-dialing telephone survey of noninstitutionalized adults aged > or =18 years; 50 states and the District of Columbia participated in BRFSS in 1994, and 48 states and the District of Columbia participated in 1992. METHODS: Several different analyses were conducted: a) analysis of state risk factor and preventive practice prevalences by sex and race (i.e., black and white); b) mapping; c) cluster analysis; d) correlations of state prevalence rates by sex and race; and e) regression of state risk factor prevalences on state CHD and stroke mortality rates. RESULTS: Mapping the prevalence of selected CVD risk factors and preventive health practices indicates substantial geographic variation for black and white men and women, as confirmed by cluster analysis. Data for blacks are limited by small sample size, especially in western states. Geographic clustering is found for physical inactivity, smoking, and risk factor combinations. Risk factor prevalences are generally lower in the West and higher in the East. White men and white women are more similar in state risk factor rates than other race-sex pairs; white women and black women ranked second in similarity. State prevalences of physical inactivity and hypertension are strongly associated with state mortality rates of CVD. INTERPRETATION: Geographic patterns of risk factor prevalence suggest the presence (or absence) of sociocultural environments that promote (or inhibit) the given risk factor or preventive behavior. Because the risk factors examined in this summary are associated with CVD, further exploration of the reasons underlying observed geographic patterns might be useful. The BRFSS will continue to provide geographic data about cardiovascular health behaviors with a possible emphasis on more data-based small- area analyses and mapping. This will permit states to more adequately monitor trends that affect the burden of CVD in their regions and the United States. Mapping also facilitates the exploration of patterns of morbidity, health-care use, and mortality, as well as the epidemiology of risk factors. Finally, by identifying those segments of the population with high levels of these risk factors and lower levels of the preventive health practices, public health personnel can better allocate resources and target intervention efforts for the prevention of CVD.

Adult↗

Expressing medicine side effects: assessing the effectiveness of absolute risk, relative risk, and number needed to harm, and the provision of baseline risk information.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of absolute risk, relative risk, and number needed to harm formats for medicine side effects, with and without the provision of baseline risk information. METHODS: A two factor, risk increase format (relative, absolute and NNH)xbaseline (present/absent) between participants design was used. A sample of 268 women was given a scenario about increase in side effect risk with third generation oral contraceptives, and were required to answer written questions to assess their understanding, satisfaction, and likelihood of continuing to take the drug. RESULTS: Provision of baseline information significantly improved risk estimates and increased satisfaction, although the estimates were still considerably higher than the actual risk. No differences between presentation formats were observed when baseline information was presented. Without baseline information, absolute risk led to the most accurate performance. CONCLUSION: The findings support the importance of informing people about baseline level of risk when describing risk increases. In contrast, they offer no support for using number needed to harm. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Health professionals should provide baseline risk information when presenting information about risk increases or decreases. More research is needed before numbers needed to harm (or treat) should be given to members of the general populations.

Adolescent↗

Are there health risks in using risking systems? The case of perinatal risk assessment.

Health risk management is receiving widespread public and professional attention. Relationships between risks and health effects are often assumed to be real and taken for granted. While health risk assessments are increasingly conducted, they are sometimes not well grounded and frequently poorly studied. Knowledge of the sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of risk factors in clearly identified target populations is required if appropriate interventions are to be designed. 'Risking systems' are often comprised of risk factors which have little predictive usefulness. In the field of perinatal medicine, the identification of risk factors has a long history. The changing risk status of pregnant women during the prenatal period, in labor, and at the time of delivery poses problems for the research and clinician who rely on risking systems to characterize the likelihood of adverse events. Currently used risking systems, antepartum and intrapartum, are not sufficiently robust for this task. The assignment of a high risk status often results in overcalling a problem and a cascade of technological interventions may follow. In the current climate of 'managing' pregnancies, a thoughtful review of the quality of risking systems is required. Are we being over-risked and over-served?

Cerebral Palsy↗

Assessment of absolute risk of death after myocardial infarction by use of multiple-risk-factor assessment equations: GISSI-Prevenzione mortality risk chart.

AIMS: To present and discuss a comprehensive and ready to use prediction model of risk of death after myocardial infarction based on the very recently concluded follow-up of the large GISSI-Prevenzione cohort and on the integrated evaluation of different categories of risk factors: those that are non-modifiable, and those related to lifestyles, co-morbidity, background, and other conventional clinical complications produced by the index myocardial infarction. METHODS: The 11-324 men and women recruited in the study within 3 months from their index myocardial infarction have been followed-up to 4 years. The following risk factors have been used in a Cox proportional hazards model: non-modifiable risk factors: age and sex; complications after myocardial infarction: indicators of left ventricular dysfunction (signs or symptoms of acute left ventricular failure during hospitalization, ejection fraction, NYHA class and extent of ventricular asynergy at echocardiography), indicators of electrical instability (number of premature ventricular beats per hour, sustained or repetitive arrhythmias during 24-h Holter monitoring), indicators of residual ischaemia (spontaneous angina pectoris after myocardial infarction, Canadian Angina Classification class, and exercise testing results); cardiovascular risk factors: smoking habits, history of diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, blood total and HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, fibrinogen, leukocytes count, intermittent claudication, and heart rate. Multiple regression modelling was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Generalizability of the models was assessed through cross validation and bootstrapping techniques. POPULATION AND RESULTS: During the 4 years of follow-up, a total of 1071 patients died. Age and left ventricular dysfunction were the most relevant predictors of death. Because of pharmacological treatments, total blood cholesterol, triglycerides, and blood pressure values were not significantly associated with prognosis. Sex-specific prediction equations were formulated to predict risk of death according to age, simple indicators of left ventricular dysfunction, electrical instability, and residual ischaemia along with the following cardiovascular risk factors: smoking habits, history of diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension, blood HDL cholesterol, fibrinogen, leukocyte count, intermittent claudication, and heart rate. The predictive models produced on the basis of information available in the routine conditions of clinical care after myocardial infarction provide ready to use and highly discriminant criteria to guide secondary prevention strategies. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Besides documenting what should be the preferred and practicable focus of clinical attention for today's patients, the experience of GISSI-Prevenzione suggests that periodically and prospectively collected databases on naturalistic' cohorts could be an important option for updating and verifying the impact of guidelines, which should incorporate the different components of the complex profile of cardiovascular risk. The GISSI Prevenzione risk function is a simple tool to predict risk of death and to improve clinical management of subjects with recent myocardial infarction. The use of predictive risk algorithms can favour the shift from medical logic, based on the treatment of single risk factors, to one centred on the patient as a whole as well as the tailoring of medical interventions according to patients' overall risk.

Adult↗

Coronary heart disease risk assessment in diabetes mellitus: comparison of UKPDS risk engine with Framingham risk assessment function and its clinical implications.

AIMS: To assess differences between absolute coronary heart disease (CHD) risks calculated by Joint British Societies (JBS) risk calculator and UKPDS risk engine and its impact on CHD primary prevention management in diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: Seven hundred Type 2 DM patients without arterial complications were identified from nine general practices in the Scarborough area. Their absolute 10-year CHD risks were calculated. The differences in the proportion of patients identified for aspirin and statin under JBS and National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines by these two methods were determined. The proportion of additional patients identified for statin in the Scarborough population as a consequence of CHD risk threshold reduction from 30 to 15% (as recommended by NICE) was also determined. RESULTS: UKPDS risk engine calculated significantly higher mean 10-year CHD risk (UKPDS vs. JBS, 21.5 vs. 18.3%, P < 0.0001). Both methods identified approximately 65% of patients to be eligible for aspirin and statin if NICE recommendations were followed. At a risk threshold of 30%, the UKPDS risk engine identified more patients for statin. Reducing the CHD risk threshold from 30 to 15% for statin initiation will identify an additional 0.5% of the total population for this treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Both methods are comparable in identifying at-risk patients under NICE recommendations. A high proportion has risk levels that merits primary CHD prevention. Lowering the risk threshold for statin treatment has a small numerical impact on the whole population.

Adult↗