PubMed · 7081615
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
L Dakov, D Karadimov. 1982. [Improved method for x-ray pelvimetry].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7081615/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Embryology as a field is in a period of unprecedented change in its knowledge base. Similarly, this is a period of great change in medical curricular planning. One of the most significant questions in embryology education for medical students is how much of the "new" molecular embryology to mix with the "old" developmental anatomy approach. The other question is the most effective venue for instruction in medical embryology. Not all medical curricula have the same objectives; nor do they use the same educational approach. With that in mind, this review outlines several ways in which medical embryology can be offered and how it can be integrated into the medical curriculum. It also lays out topics that are worthy of inclusion in a modern embryology course or sequence.
The 'Perruche' decree (confirmed by the Paris Court of Cassation in November 2001) recognizes the right of those born with a handicap to claim for compensation. However, there is a fear that this decree might lead to deviations in the requests submitted for systematic compensation, simply because of a handicap or prejudice, even in the absence of a medical error. The interest of the 'Perruche' decree is that it once again raises the question of the management of handicapped people in our society and the lack of sufficient help from the State. The decree also emphasizes the strong subjacent risk that a handicap could be considered as a failure or a medical error. The excessive ideology of a 'perfect' child may therefore provoke the reject of the idea that a human being may be born with a deficiency or "imperfection". It also reminds us that medical practice remains exposed to errors and incertitude and that a zero risk does not exist, contrary to certain fantastical beliefs fostered by the principle of precaution. The hazard may correspond to the notion of incertitude. But it must not be confused with an error and it implies that which is unforeseeable. It is important that physicians stall the faith in the power of ultramodern techniques. Conversely, they should not claim a right to systematic error, when errors in fact hide authentic faults. The medical discourse must therefore remain responsible.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.