Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 6906267

Implications for future studies in humans.

Abstract

While an environmental link with cancer is widely accepted, its implications are not always understood. Because of the multistage nature of carcinogenesis, it is insufficient to study initiation only at the level of the 'target cell', since events before and after initiation may prove pivotal to neoplastic development. Estimates of the relative contributions of factors causing human cancer are briefly summarized. Tumours related to patterns of life style--including diet and behaviour--and individual susceptibility are discussed. It is in this group of tumours that metabolizing enzymes are probably most significant, especially for weak initiating stimuli, whether extrinsic or intrinsic. There are few epidemiological data available at present but future research can be suggested, to improve the definition in biochemical terms of individual susceptibility and effects of life style.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Higginson. 1980. Implications for future studies in humans.. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470720592.ch19

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The inversion In(2L)t impacts complex, environmentally sensitive behaviors in Drosophila melanogaster.

Genetic variation in behavioral traits allows organisms to respond and adapt to environmental challenges. Genetic variation in behavior is often affected by many genes and thus has a complex genetic basis. Inversions, the reorientation of genes along the chromosome, tightly link genetic variants together because they suppress recombination. Therefore, inversions are believed to have a major impact on phenotypic variation because they combine the effects of multiple genes, which can pleiotropically alter multiple aspects of behavior. This study investigates how the inversion In(2L)t, found in Drosophila melanogaster populations around the world, impacts different aspects of behavior in an environment-sensitive manner. We test the activity, foraging, and startle-induced behavior of flies with different In(2L)t genotypes across sex and temperatures. We observe that Drosophila homozygous for In(2L)t sleep less frequently, spend more time away from a food source, and have a longer duration of startle response. Additionally, the impacts of In(2L)t on aspects of behavior can be sex-specific and are largely consistent across temperatures. Taken together, our research demonstrates that inversions can regulate aspects of behavior, and suggests hypotheses explaining the distribution of In(2L)t across space and time.

Behavior↗

Gene-environment interdependence.

Behavioural genetics was initially concerned with partitioning population variance into that due to genetics and that due to environmental influences. The implication was that the two were separate and it was assumed that gene-environment interactions were usually of so little importance that they could safely be ignored. Theoretical considerations suggested that that was unlikely to be true and empirical findings are now accumulating on the demonstrated and replicated biological interactions between identified common single genetic variants and the operation of environmentally mediated risks. The paper outlines the evidence and considers why it is changing concepts in ways that matter.

Behavior↗

Endless minds most beautiful.

The marriage of evolution and development to produce the new discipline 'evo-devo' in biology is situated in the general history of evolutionary biology, and its significance for developmental cognitive science is discussed. The discovery and description of the highly conserved, robust and 'evolvable' mechanisms that organize the vertebrate body plan and fundamental physiology have direct implications for what we should investigate in the evolution of behavior and cognition.

Behavior↗