Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 6738143

Improving physician performance through peer comparison feedback.

R N Winickoff·K L Coltin·M M Morgan·R C Buxbaum·G O Barnett
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A project to improve physician performance in colorectal cancer screening was evaluated as part of an ambulatory quality assurance program. A minimum standard was adopted requiring a digital examination and stool test for occult blood at annual check-ups of patients aged 40 years and older. During a 31/2-year period, three different intervention strategies for improved compliance with the standard were sequentially implemented and assessed: educational meeting, retrospective feedback of group compliance rate, and retrospective feedback of individual compliance rate compared with that of peers. A pretest/posttest design was employed in evaluating the first two intervention strategies. Neither strategy resulted in significant improvement in compliance. Monthly feedback of individual performance ranked with that of peers was then implemented in a randomized clinical trial utilizing a crossover design. During the first 6-month period, the physicians receiving feedback (group 1) improved from 66.0% to 79.9% (P less than 0.001), while the control group (group 2) also improved, from 67.5% to 76.6% (P less than 0.001), suggesting a spillover effect. During the second 6-month period, group 2 received feedback and group 1 did not. Group 1 stabilized at approximately 80% while group 2 continued to improve from 76.6% to 84.0% (P less than 0.001). Behavior changes persisted at 6 and 12 months after intervention.

Explore related subjects

BostonClinical CompetenceColonic NeoplasmsEducation, Medical, ContinuingFeedbackGroup Practice, PrepaidHumansInternal MedicineMass ScreeningOccult BloodPeer ReviewQuality Assurance, Health CareRandom AllocationRectal NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesComparative StudyJournal ArticleResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R N Winickoff, K L Coltin, M M Morgan, R C Buxbaum, G O Barnett. 1984. Improving physician performance through peer comparison feedback.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-198406000-00003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2000

A comparison of the preventive health care provided by women's health centers and general internal medicine practices.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate women's health centers as alternatives to traditional internal medicine practices. DESIGN: Cross-sectional mailed survey. SETTING: A women's health center and an internal medicine practice at each of three university-affiliated teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: There were 3,035 female patients randomly selected to receive a mailed survey after their office visits. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The survey asked for patient characteristics, patient satisfaction, and rates of gender-specific preventive health services. The survey response rate was 64% (1, 942/3,035). Patients at women's health centers were younger, more educated, had higher physical functioning but lower mental health functioning, and more of them were single and employed. Patient satisfaction was similar at the two types of practices, although patients at women's health centers were more satisfied with certain aspects of the patient-provider interaction. After adjusting for measured differences in patient characteristics and site, patients at women's health centers were more likely to receive discussions on hormone replacement therapy (odds ratio [OR] 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1, 2.2) and dietary calcium (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.1, 1. 6). They were also more likely to receive their gender-specific preventive health services from their primary care provider: breast examination (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.5, 2.6), Pap smear (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.9, 3.1), hormone replacement therapy discussion (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.5, 3. 3), and dietary calcium discussion (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.7, 3.9). These findings remained when the analyses were limited to patients of female providers only. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, patients at women's health centers were more likely to receive gender-specific health prevention counseling than patients at internal medicine practices. Moreover, patients were more likely to receive their gender-specific preventive health services from their primary care providers.

Boston↗
PubMed2000

Consumer contributions in developing clinical practice guidelines.

Clinical practice guidelines are designed for use with consumers. However, consumers are rarely consulted about their development. This paper describes a research project to develop clinical practice guidelines for a community meeting to prevent and intervene with assaultive behavior. The research included consumer input from psychiatric inpatients. The two-phase approach with the consumers included a focus group, followed by survey research. Results, problems, and recommendations are presented.

Boston↗