Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 6670936

[Allergic inflammation].

Abstract

Current ideas of allergic inflammation reflected in the concept of immune inflammation are described. This concept considers immune inflammation to be an immune response mediated by a certain immunity reaction which gives the inflammation a number of qualitative and quantitative differences. The nature of the differences allows allergic (immune) inflammation to be evaluated as a biologically expedient type of defence-adaptative reaction in which the inflammatory response is optimally expressed owing to the participation of immunological mechanisms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

V P Bykova. 1983. [Allergic inflammation].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6670936/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Eosinophilic granulocytes and damage-associated molecular pattern molecules (DAMPs): role in the inflammatory response within tumors.

The development of a tumor over many years typically leads to reciprocal alternations in the host and the tumor, enabling tumor growth paradoxically in the setting of substantial necrosis and inflammation. When evaluating a tumor, it is important to assess 3 elements: (1) the quantity and quality of tumor-associated leukocytes, (2) their state of activation, and (3) tumor microenvironment. Peripheral blood eosinophilia and tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia are frequently associated with some tumor types and also found after immunotherapy with IL-2, IL-4, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and antibody to CTLA-4. Within several tumor types including gastrointestinal tumors, tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia is associated with a significantly better prognosis. The converse is true in other tumor types such as differentiated oral squamous cell carcinoma. On the basis of the emergent data, tumor-associated eosinophils have at least 2 dominant nonoverlapping activities: (1) destructive effector functions potentially limiting tumor growth as well as causing recruitment and activation of other leukocytes, (2) immunoregulative and remodeling activities which suppress immune response and promote tumor proliferation. The mechanism by which eosinophils in particular are recruited into tumor tissue is largely unknown. Candidates for causing eosinophil chemotaxis into tumor tissue are the released damage-associated molecular pattern molecules (DAMPs) including the nuclear protein high mobility group box 1. High mobility group box 1 is released upon necrotic cell death and secreted by many cells, particularly during periods of nutrient, hypoxic, or oxidant stress. This overview on eosinophil biology in the context of cancer and necrosis, introduces intriguing and novel strategies targeting eosinophils to enable more effective biologic therapy for cancer patients.

Eosinophils↗

Allergic eosinophilic gastroenteritis with protein-losing enteropathy: intestinal pathology, clinical course, and long-term follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: A subset of patients with allergic eosinophilic gastroenteritis (AEG) has anemia and hypoalbuminemia caused by protein-losing enteropathy (PLE). Our goals were to describe the response to therapy and the long-term outcome of patients in this subgroup and to evaluate their gastric and intestinal biopsies for distinguishing features that might explain their protein and blood loss. METHODS: Patients with AEG + PLE were identified retrospectively and compared with controls and with patients with AEG only. Immunohistochemical staining for tryptase, a mast cell mediator, was performed on gastric and duodenal tissues. Eosinophils identified by hematoxylin/eosin stain and mast cells identified as tryptase-positive cells were counted in one high-power field area with maximal cell infiltration. RESULTS: Although all patients had excellent response to therapy with amino acid-based formula and tolerated gradual introduction of some foods with time, food-responsive disease persisted in all patients over 2.5 to 5.5 years of follow-up. Routine histological evaluation did not show any features differentiating AEG + PLE from AEG. When eosinophils and mast cells were counted in intestinal biopsies, however, significantly more mast cells were found in biopsies of the AEG + PLE group despite comparable numbers of eosinophils. In contrast, in gastric biopsies, eosinophils were more prominent in AEG + PLE, but mast cell numbers were similar in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AEG + PLE responded well to therapy with amino acid-based formula. Food hypersensitivities did not completely resolve over up to 5.5 years. Intestinal mast cells were significantly increased in maximally infiltrated areas of the intestine, possibly causing increased intestinal permeability and protein loss.

Eosinophils↗