Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 6546578

Caveat emptor: assessing needs, evaluating computer options.

Abstract

A variety of services and microcomputer programs are available for providing the dietitian with a mechanized diet-analysis system for calculating nutrients from food records or recipes. They differ widely in the content of their data bases, cost, ease of use, reporting of results, flexibility, and other features. The characteristics of seven programs available by mail order from diet-analysis service vendors and five microcomputer programs were compared. The results of analysis of a one-day food record using various systems and coding by three different operators were compared. Differences by both system and operator were apparent. Nutritionists need to recognize that for some programs the reliability and the validity of data are uncertain. When making purchasing decisions for nonresearch applications, the nutritionist is advised to compare systems and services and to consider carefully whether mechanized diet analysis is of sufficient benefit in the delivery of high-quality nutrition care to offset its cost. The dietitian who chooses to use computerized diet analysis has a responsibility for making sure that reported results are reasonable and for interpreting results to other health professionals and to patients.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Dwyer, C W Suitor. 1984. Caveat emptor: assessing needs, evaluating computer options.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6546578/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Digitization of photographic slides: simple, effective, fast, and inexpensive method.

The technological evolution has changed multiple areas of plastic surgery, including photography. The photograph is one of the instruments used most by the plastic surgeon, and it cannot be eliminated by technological changes. The principal change in photography is that images can be scanned through digital cameras instead of slides. Despite the multiple advantages that digital photography represents, many surgeons are resisting the change. One of the main reasons for this resistance is the large quantity of photographic slides that need to be digitized to be used at scientific conferences as well as in publications. The methods and existing techniques for digitizing slides are costly and time-consuming, and there is risk for loss of definition and image brightness. The authors present a simple, effective, fast, and inexpensive method for digitizing slides. This method has been validated by various plastic surgeons and is effective for use in multimedia presentations and for paper printouts with publication quality.

Computers↗