Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 6530063

A resource centre for practice based research.

S H Gehlbach·J A Bobula
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Academic family medicine units can provide an important service to practice-based researchers. A pilot programme was set up to test the feasibility of a practice-based Research Resource Centre in the Duke-Watts Family Medicine Program to provide support and expertise to practitioners who wish to carry out research projects in their practices. Physicians gained research experience and knowledge while actually performing the research in their own practice settings. They were able to proceed with projects at their own pace and use our resources as needed. At the same time, the interest and availability of our staff provided them with the necessary momentum to see their projects to completion.

Explore related subjects

AbsenteeismAdultBreast FeedingEducation, Medical, ContinuingFamily PracticeHumansInformation ServicesLung Diseases, ObstructiveResearchRural HealthUnited StatesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S H Gehlbach, J A Bobula. 1984. A resource centre for practice based research.. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra%2F1.1.48

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

Economic consequences of injury and resulting family coping strategies in Ghana.

The toll of human suffering from illness and injury is usually measured by mortality and disability rates. Economic consequences, such as treatment costs and lost productivity, are often considered as well. Lately, increasing attention has been paid to the economic effects of illness on a household level. In this study, we sought to assess the economic consequences of injuries in Ghana by looking at the effects on households and the coping mechanisms these households employed. Using cluster sampling and household interviews, we surveyed 21,105 persons living in 431 urban and rural sites. We sought information on any injury that occurred to a household member during the prior year and that resulted in one or more days of disability time.A total of 1609 injuries were reported for the prior year. Treatment costs and disability days were higher in the urban area than in the rural. Coping strategies were different between the two areas. Rural households were more likely to utilize intra-family labor reallocation (90%) than were urban households (75%). Rural households were also more likely to borrow money (24%) than were urban (19%). Households in both areas were equally likely to sell belongings, although the nature of the belongings sold were different. Although injuries in the urban area had more severe primary effects (treatment cost and disability time), the ultimate effect on rural households appeared more severe. A greater percentage of rural households (28%) reported a decline in food consumption than did urban households (19%). These findings result in several policy implications, including measures that could be used to assist family coping strategies and measures directed toward injuries themselves.

Absenteeism↗
PubMed2003

Does smoking affect the outcome of patient education and self-management in asthmatics?

Information on the potential effect of smoking on the outcome of patient education in asthma is lacking. We randomly allocated 78 asthmatics to either a control or intervention group. Intervention consisted of two 2-h group sessions followed by 1-2 individual sessions each by a nurse and a physiotherapist. Self-management was emphasised following a stepwise treatment plan at exacerbations. Smokers experienced more general practitioner (GP) visits (P=0.001) and absenteeism from work (P=0.02), a greater need for rescue medication (P=0.03), a larger drop in FEV1 (P=0.02) and worse St. George's respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ) scores (P<0.001) compared to non-smokers during the 1-year follow-up. In multiple linear and logistic regression models smoking was still associated with worse SGRQ scores, a drop in FEV1, higher need for GP visits and rescue medication and higher total costs. We, thus, conclude that smoking was associated with reduced health related quality of life, a drop in FEV1, increased need for rescue medication and GP visits and higher costs after patient education during the 1-year follow-up, compared to no smoking.

Absenteeism↗
PubMed2003

The cost-effectiveness of psychotherapy and paroxetine for severe irritable bowel syndrome.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Psychotherapy and antidepressants are effective in patients with severe irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but the cost-effectiveness of either treatment in routine practice has not been established. METHODS: Patients with severe IBS were randomly allocated to receive 8 sessions of individual psychotherapy, 20 mg daily of the specific serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant, paroxetine, or routine care by a gastroenterologist and general practitioner. Primary outcome measures of abdominal pain, health-related quality of life, and health care costs were determined after 3 months of treatment and 1 year later. RESULTS: A total of 257 subjects (81% response rate) from 7 hospitals were recruited; 59 of 85 patients (69%) randomized to psychotherapy and 43 of 86 (50%) of the paroxetine group completed the full course of treatment. Both psychotherapy and paroxetine were superior to treatment as usual in improving the physical aspects of health-related quality of life (SF-36 physical component score improvement, 5.2 [SEM, 1.26], 5.8 [SEM, 1.0], and -0.3 [SEM, 1.17]; P < 0.001), but there was no difference in the psychological component. During the follow-up year, psychotherapy but not paroxetine was associated with a significant reduction in health care costs compared with treatment as usual (psychotherapy, $976 [SD, $984]; paroxetine, $1252 [SD, $1616]; and treatment as usual, $1663 [SD, $3177]). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with severe IBS, both psychotherapy and paroxetine improve health-related quality of life at no additional cost.

Absenteeism↗