Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 6375453

A highly sensitive photometric method for proton release or uptake: difference protometry.

K Horie·H Hagihara·A Wada·H Fukutome
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A highly sensitive quantitative method was developed to detect protons released or taken up upon ligand binding. A small change in pH due to proton release or uptake was detected by measuring the difference in the absorbance of a pH indicator upon ligand addition. Owing to the difference detection of protons, the uncertainty of pH due to CO2 dissolution and unknown buffering capacities of sample solutes could be compensated with easy manipulations. Precise calibration of the absolute amount of protons could also be made very easily. The amount of protons measurable by the method is as small as 0.5 nmol that is 10 to 30 times more sensitive than the pH-stat method. We measured the Mg2+ ion-induced proton releases of ADP to confirm the accuracy and reliability of the method and of Escherichia coli ribosomes to show the improvement in sensitivity. The method is useful for protometric studies of biomolecules that are difficult to obtain in large amount.

Explore related subjects

Acid-Base EquilibriumAdenosine DiphosphateBromthymol BlueBuffersEscherichia coliHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationIndicators and ReagentsMagnesiumMagnesium ChlorideMicrochemistryPhenolphthaleinsPhenolsulfonphthaleinRibosomesSpectrophotometryThymolComparative StudyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K Horie, H Hagihara, A Wada, H Fukutome. 1984. A highly sensitive photometric method for proton release or uptake: difference protometry.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(84)90350-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

The weighted walking test as an alternative method of assessing aerobic power.

The aim of the present study was to determine maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) directly during uphill walking exercise and to compare these values with those achieved during running and cycling exercise. Forty untrained students (20 males and 20 females) took part in three exercise tests. The running test was performed on a horizontal treadmill and the speed was gradually increased by 0.3 m . s(-1) every 3 min. The walking test was conducted on a treadmill inclined at 12% (speed of 1.8 m . s(-1)). The load was further increased every 3 min by the addition of a mass of one-twentieth of the body mass of the participant (plastic containers filled with water and added to a backpack carried by the participant). During the bicycle ergometry test, the workload was increased by 20 W every 2 min. All tests were performed until volitional exhaustion. During all tests, oxygen uptake, minute ventilation, tidal volume, respiratory frequency, heart rate, hydrogen ion concentration, base excess, and blood lactate concentration were analysed. The Pearson correlation coefficients between the weighted walking test and the commonly applied running and bicycle ergometry tests indicate a strong association with the new test in evaluating maximal oxygen uptake. The negligible differences in VO2max between the three tests for the male participants (running: 61.0 ml . kg(-1) . min(-1); walking: 60.4 ml . kg(-1) . min(-1); cycling: 60.2 ml . kg(-1) . min(-1)), and the fact that the females achieved better results on the walking test than the cycle ergometer test (running: 45.0 ml . kg(-1) . min(-1); walking: 42.6 ml . kg(-1) . min(-1); cycling: 40.1 ml . kg(-1) . min(-1)), confirm the suitability of the new method for evaluating aerobic power. The weighted walking test could be useful in the assessment of aerobic power in individuals for whom running is not advised or is difficult. In addition, the new test allows for determination of VO2max on small treadmills with a limited speed regulator, such as those found in specialist physiotherapy and fitness centres.

Acid-Base Equilibrium↗
PubMed2007

Mandatory protocol for treating adult patients with diabetic ketoacidosis decreases intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay: results of a nonrandomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of a mandatory protocol for treating diabetic ketoacidosis. DESIGN: Chart review of patients treated before and after protocol implementation. SETTING: University-affiliated U.S. public teaching hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 241 consecutive nonpregnant patients >18 yrs old admitted to a medical intensive care unit for diabetic ketoacidosis between January 2000 and January 2005. INTERVENTION: Implementation of a mandatory treatment protocol in May 2003. MEASUREMENTS: Intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay, time to correction of anion gap and ketone clearance, and hypoglycemic episodes. RESULTS: Before protocol implementation, the mean +/- sd intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay were 44 +/- 28 hrs and 91 +/- 73 hrs, respectively. After implementation, intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay decreased 23% and 30%, to 34 +/- 18 hrs and 64 +/- 41 hrs, respectively (both p < .007). Time to anion gap closure and ketone clearance also decreased (both p < .05). No difference in the number of hypoglycemic episodes was observed. CONCLUSION: Implementing a mandatory protocol for treating adult patients with diabetic ketoacidosis decreases intensive care and hospital lengths of stay and time to anion gap closure and ketone clearance, without increasing the rate of hypoglycemia.

Acid-Base Equilibrium↗