Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 628853

Functional status evaluation form: development and implications.

Abstract

A medical audit revealed marked deficiency in the quality of functional evaluations in a rehabilitation hospital. Routine staff educational programs and an optional, simple functional evaluation form failed to correct this deficiency. The functional evaluations of the patients never reached 100% completion and the quality of the evaluations varied widely. As a result, a mandatory functional status form was devised for incorporation into the patients' charts. This form included past, present, and future goals in a problem-oriented design. Review of charts after six months of use showed that the form led to improved rates of functional status reporting, with all functional areas now documented in over 90% of charts. It is hoped that a comprehensive program including use of functional status form will be successful in improving patient care and physician education, and in facilitating a comprehensive medical audit.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Grabois, T Strax. 1978. Functional status evaluation form: development and implications.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007611-197803000-00026

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Predicting improvement in stroke patients referred for inpatient rehabilitation.

An historical prospective study of prediction of improvement and final disposition of 105 patients with a stroke was carried out over a 2-year period in the rehabilitation service of a hospital providing long-term care. Patients were referred a mean of 37.8 days after the stroke, and were evaluated for total function and for mental status, perception, communication and motor ability at the time of admission and every 2 to 3 weeks thereafter. At the time of admission 26% of the patients were able to care for themselves; at the time of discharge 59% were able to do so, but 44% of these could not return home, primarily because of unfavourable social and environmental circumstances. In contrast, 35% of the patients unable to care for themselves went home because their families were willing to provide extra care. Neither the total function score nor the neurologic subtest scores at the time of admission predicted improvement. The presence of sphincter control and a lower age were the only significant predictors of improvement.

Activities of Daily Living