Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 6141296

Mood changes during the internship.

Abstract

A prospective study using two standardized psychological tests, the Profile of Mood States (POMS) and the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), was conducted in an effort to quantify the emotional changes experienced by internal medicine house staff members during the internship. In contrast to instruments used in previous investigations of this type, the POMS and the SDS are standardized tests with proven reliability and validity. The six mood factors measured, "tension-anxiety," "depression-dejection," "anger-hostility," "vigor-activity," "fatigue-inertia," and "confusion-bewilderment," are reported to be among those factors most often affected by the internship experience. Twenty-three interns completed both tests at four-month intervals during one academic year. One-way analysis of variance for repeated measures revealed that the level of only anger-hostility of the mood factors changed significantly during the year. The intensity of this factor increased between the first and third testing periods before dropping at the end of the year. In contrast to findings in previous studies, the depression and fatigue factors did not increase during the year. By characterizing interns' reactions to the stresses of postgraduate medical education, standardized psychological tests can contribute to improved understanding of these reactions and to more intelligent planning of support systems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R L Uliana, F A Hubbell, F A Wyle, G H Gordon. 1984. Mood changes during the internship.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-198402000-00008

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations.

Three experiments investigated the interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations. In the course of a computer-mediated negotiation, participants received information about the emotional state (anger, happiness, or none) of their opponent. Consistent with a strategic-choice perspective, Experiment 1 showed that participants conceded more to an angry opponent than to a happy one. Experiment 2 showed that this effect was caused by tracking--participants used the emotion information to infer the other's limit, and they adjusted their demands accordingly. However, this effect was absent when the other made large concessions. Experiment 3 examined the interplay between experienced and communicated emotion and showed that angry communications (unlike happy ones) induced fear and thereby mitigated the effect of the opponent's experienced emotion. These results suggest that negotiators are especially influenced by their opponent's emotions when they are motivated and able to consider them.

Anger↗