Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 526196

Luganda speech audiometry.

C Nsamba
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Monosyllabic, quasi-monosyllabic and disyllabic word lists have been constructed from Luganda language material. These lists readily afford a means for determining speech-hearing ability for Luganda-speaking subjects. The speech-audiometric curve obtained on normally hearing Luganda-speaking subjects with monosyllabic material has a form which is similar to that for the normal curve obtained with English monosyllabic word lists on English-speaking subjects. As indicated by previous authors, the form of the speech-audiometric curve is that of a cumulative distribution, making presentation of the data on arithmetical probability paper convenient. Since monosyllabic words are uncommon in the Luganda and other Bantu languages, it is considered that quasimonosyllabic lists might be preferred in clinical situations.

Explore related subjects

Audiometry, SpeechHumansLinguisticsPhoneticsUgandaJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Nsamba. Luganda speech audiometry.. https://doi.org/10.3109/00206097909072642

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

Multicenter audiometric results with the Vibrant Soundbridge, a semi-implantable hearing device for sensorineural hearing impairment.

The Vibrant Soundbridge, a semi-implantable hearing device for subjects with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing impairment was introduced commercially. First audiologic results are presented on 63 patients from 10 European implant centers. Hearing loss was at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz varying between 43 and 81 dB HL. The patients used the analogue audio processor, type 302. Measured sound-field gain was compared with NAL-R target values. For most patients an acceptable agreement was found. There was a subgroup of patients, however, with relatively low gain. The results suggest that this was related to the suboptimal positioning and fixation of the transducer to the incus.

Audiometry, Speech↗
PubMed2001

Comparison of two digital hearing instrument fitting strategies.

Two different hearing instrument fitting strategies were compared in the laboratory and in a field test with regard to the benefit for hearing aid users and their satisfaction with the fitting. DSL [input/output (i/o)] fittings based on hearing threshold and uncomfortable levels for the subject were evaluated vs a prescriptive fitting method based on unaided loudness scaling. Twenty-one subjects were fitted diotically with both fitting strategies implemented in a digital hearing instrument (Siemens Prisma). The patients tested both fitting strategies sequentially in a 4 + 4-week field trial using a crossover study design. Speech recognition threshold measurements, sound quality ratings and paired comparisons of sound quality were performed for all conditions (unaided, DSL[i/o] fitting and loudness-based fitting). In addition, subjective benefit and preference were assessed with questionnaires. Speech audiometry did not reveal significant differences between the two fittings. DSL[i/o] fittings showed superior results in most sound quality tests and in the self-assessment of communication abilities while the loudness-based approach was slightly preferred in noisy environments. The results seemed to be influenced by the higher gain predicted by DSL[i/o]. This study provides no evidence that effort spent on loudness scaling leads to improved fitting results.

Audiometry, Speech↗
PubMed2001

Maximizing effective audibility in hearing aid fitting.

OBJECTIVE: This paper examines why more audibility is not always better than less audibility if hearing-impaired people are to best understand speech. DESIGN: We used speech perception data from 14 normally hearing and 40 hearing-impaired people to quantify the contribution of audibility to speech intelligibility. The quantification revealed that the effectiveness of audibility decreased with hearing loss, and the decrement was greater at high frequencies than at lower frequencies. To apply the Speech Intelligibility Index (SII) model to predict speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired people, we modified the model to take account of effective audibility rather than physical audibility. RESULTS: The modified SII model provided an adequate description of speech performance of people with a wide range of hearing threshold levels. We applied the model to the evaluation of two prescriptions for a sloping audiogram at prescribed levels and at equated loudness levels to demonstrate the necessity of considering loudness and effective audibility in prescribing amplification. Effective audibility is defined as audibility corrected for the effects of level distortion and hearing loss desensitization, and this paper proposes a method of estimating effective audibility from hearing threshold level at different frequencies. CONCLUSIONS: The practical implication of considering effective audibility in prescribing hearing aids is that for a given listening level, less gain is provided at frequencies where the hearing is most impaired to allow more gain at frequencies where audibility is most useful. In developing the NAL-NL1 prescription for nonlinear hearing aids, we adopted the modified SII model together with a loudness model to derive optimal gain-frequency response characteristics that maximize predicted speech intelligibility for people with different degrees of hearing losses.

Audiometry, Speech↗