PubMed · 4836613
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J Roussos. 1974. Total eversion of the upper lids.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4836613/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The extensive use of chloramphenicol (CAP) in livestock leads the accumulation of CAP in livestock manures, threatening environmental and human health. Therefore, eliminating or reducing CAP concentration in manures before its re-utilization and application through microbial remediation is necessary. Exiguobacterium sp. CAP4, isolated from the plastisphere in duck manures, was capable of degrading CAP with the biodegradation efficiency of 97.8 % at initial CAP concentration of 5 mg/L within 4 days. A total of twenty-four biotransformation products were determined, including two novel transformation products, TP166 and TP203, enriched the integrity of CAP biodegradation pathways. Furthermore, the biotransformation process was proposed as a detoxifying process through biotransformation products toxicity evaluation. Notably, Exiguobacterium sp. CAP4 successfully colonized in the cow manures after inoculation, and bioaugmented the biodegradation of CAP in virgin cow manures. This study significantly extended our understanding of the CAP biotransformation fate, and provided a promising bacterial strain for bioremediation of CAP containing wastewater in situ.
In a model system derived from Escherichia coli, acetylphenylalanyl-puromycin is produced in a pseudo-first-order reaction between the preformed acetylphenylalanyl/tRNA/poly(U)/ribosome complex (complex C) and excess puromycin. Two aminoacyl analogs [3, Gly-chloramphenicol (CAM): 4, L-Phe-CAM] and two peptidyl analogs (2, L-Phe-Gly-CAM: 5, Gly-Phe-CAM) of CAM (1) were tested as inhibitors in this reaction. Detailed kinetic analysis suggests that these analogs (I) react competitively with complex C and form the complex C*l, which is inactive toward puromycin. C*l is formed via a two-step mechanism in which C*l is the product of a slow conformational change of the initial encounter complex Cl according to the equation C + l reversible Cl reversible C*l. Furthermore, we provide evidence that analog 5 may react further with C*l forming the species C*l2. The values of the apparent association rate constant (K(assoc)) are 1.42 x microM-1 min-1 for 2, 0.55 x microM-1 min-1 for 3, and 0.18 x microM-1 min-1 for 4 and 0.038 x microM-1 min-1 for 5 [corrected]. In the case of analog 5, K(assoc) is a linear function of the inhibitor concentration; when [I] approaches zero, the K(assoc) value is equal to 3.8 x 10(2) M-1 sec-1. Such values allow the classification of CAM analogs as slow-binding inhibitors. According to K(assoc) values, we could surmise that analog 2 is 2.5-fold more potent than 3 and 8-fold more potent than 4. The relative potency of analog 5 is the lowest among the analogs and is dependent on its concentration. The results are compared with previous data and discussed on the basis of a possible retro-inverso relationship between CAM analogs and puromycin.
The detection of antimicrobial agent resistance among ninety-eight Haemophilus influenzae isolates was assessed by six different antibiotic test methods: agar dilution on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 5% lysed horse blood (MH-LHB), E-test using both Haemophilus test medium (HTM) agar and chocolate Mueller-Hinton (CMH) agar plates, Vitek Haemophilus susceptibility cards, and three overnight microdilution systems that included two commercial systems, Micro-Media and MicroScan, and the reference broth microdilution method using HTM broth. Agents tested in the study included ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (A/C), cefaclor, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Both the reference HTM microbroth dilution method and agar dilution correctly classified all nine of the beta-lactamase negative ampicillin resistant (BLNAR) isolates. Each of the other test methods failed to detect one of the BLNAR strains, either because of growth failure (Micro-Media and MicroScan) or miscategorization of an isolate as susceptible (E-Test HTM, E-Test CMH, and Vitek). None of the test methods detected all six isolates identified as A/C resistant by HTM microbroth dilution. Of the remaining antimicrobials tested, ampicillin and cefuroxime yielded data that could be compared by all test methods. The very major, major, and minor errors for these two antimicrobials in comparison to the reference HTM microdilution method were as follows: Micro-Media (1.7%, 0%, and 4.8%); MicroScan (11.9%, 0%, and 8.1%); E-Test HTM (1.6%, 0%, and 2.0%); E-Test CMH (1.6%, 1.6%, and 4.6%); Vitek (8.1%, 0%, and 3.1%); and agar dilution on MH-LHB (0%, 0%, and 4.6%). Micro-Media and MicroScan panels failed to support the growth of 4.1% and 5.1% of the isolates, respectively.