PubMed · 4767323
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J F Bates, G D Stafford. 1973. Polymeric denture base specifications.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4767323/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
One of the arguments for the introduction of pseudo-elastic wire materials was "the way they work biologically", that is to say, on the one hand small and uniform force over an extended period of time and on the other the avoidance of excessive forces during the leveling phase. Since an evaluation of the operative force of such an arch wire is dependent on temperature, stress-strain curve, and method of activation, and because the extent of the activation is no longer directly proportional to the operative force, the result is that it is often difficult to determine clinically, whether a safe maximum force is not being exceeded. To clarify this issue arch wires were tested in a three bracket test simulating to the greatest degree possible a clinical situation. The inter-bracket distance was selected in accordance with the situation in the upper and lower incisor region independent of the width of the bracket. The results showed rather high forces for some of the wires. Often these forces were higher in the mandibular situation due to non-ideal force deflection curves than in the supramaxilla. One of the tested materials did, however, effectively limit the operative force in the upper and lower jaw. Especially significant is that the differing characteristics of the tested wire materials result in a completely different action in relation to force development.
Modern orthodontics requires defined treatment goals. To achieve them, known force systems must be used to control the active units (teeth being moved) and the reactive units (anchorage teeth). This article discusses the methods of controlling the force systems through the variables of spring design and anchorage selection. Continuous and segmented arch treatment are contrasted in their ability to achieve optimal and defined force systems with minimal side effects.
A comparison was made on the mechanical properties of three glass-ionomer cements, one of which was of experimental fiber-reinforcing and auto-curing type. Two others were proprietary auto-curing and light-activating cements. Biaxial flexure test was conducted on disc samples. Three-point bending test was also carried out on bar samples to determine modulus of elasticity and strength. All samples were kept at 37 degrees C and 100% RH for 24 h before testing under ambient conditions. A prolonged fracture process was observed in the experimental cement, demonstrating the effect of fiber incorporation in stabilizing the fracture process. The proprietary cements failed in a brittle manner. Comparison of the mechanical properties identified three characteristics. These were a high Weibull modulus resulting from the stabilization in fracture process, a modulus of elasticity value comparable to that of dentin, and a high biaxial flexure strength close to that of a dental resin composite.