PubMed · 4610836
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
R M Ehrlich, J K Lattimer. 1974. Genitourinary tuberculosis.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4610836/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Animal models of inflammatory bowel disease are artificial and more or less representative of human disease. However, the dextran sulphate sodium (DSS) induced intestinal inflammation model has recently been shown to fulfil some pathological criteria for an adequate experimental model. AIM: To determine whether this form of experimental intestinal inflammation responds to established therapy used for human inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: DSS was used to induce intestinal inflammation in conventional Balb/c mice and athymic nu/nu CD-1(BR) mice, and the well-documented 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) based anticolitis drugs sulphasalazine (SASP) and olsalazine (OLZ) were used to study therapeutic effects. Parameters which have been shown to reflect DSS-induced intestinal inflammation (body weight, colon length, spleen weight, diarrhoea, and rectal bleeding) were measured in the Balb/c mice. RESULTS: Significant amelioration was seen on these parameters after different treatment protocols. Survival in nu/nu CD-1 mice was studied, and after 16 days a death rate of 50% was noted in the DSS group. SASP (100 mg/kg/day) and OLZ (50 mg/kg/day) significantly prolonged the survival to 29 and 38 days, respectively. SASP and OLZ showed a dose-dependent effect in the range between 10 and 100 mg/kg/day, doses closely corresponding to those used in humans. CONCLUSIONS: SASP and OLZ are able to ameliorate the DSS-induced intestinal inflammation. The dose-response patterns suggested that the active therapeutic moiety for the two drugs appears to be mainly the liberated 5-ASA molecule.
Balsalazide is a prodrug of mesalazine which has an inert carrier molecule instead of the sulfapyridine moiety of sulfasalazine. Balsalazide 6.75 g/day was more effective than mesalazine 2.4 g/day in at least 1 trial and as effective as sulfasalazine 3 g/day for inducing remission in patients with acute ulcerative colitis in 8- and 12-week trials. Moreover, complete symptom relief occurred more promptly with balsalizide 6.75 g/day than with mesalazine 2.4g/day. In long term studies, balsalazide 2 g/day was as effective as sulfasalazine 2 g/day and balsalazide 6 g/day was as effective as mesalazine 1.5 g/day, in maintaining remission in patients with ulcerative colitis. The tolerability profile of balsalazide is significantly better than that of sulfasalazine; 70% of sulfasalazine-intolerant patients were able to tolerate balsalazide.