PubMed · 4588398
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
K Arnesen. 1973-09-20. [Biopsy].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4588398/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The Melanoma Staging Committee of the AJCC has proposed major revisions of the melanoma TNM and stage grouping criteria. The committee members represent most of the major cooperative groups and cancer centers worldwide with a special interest in melanoma; the committee also collectively has had clinical experience with over 40,000 patients. The new staging system better reflects independent prognostic factors that are used in clinical trials and in reporting the outcomes of various melanoma treatment modalities. Major revisions include 1) melanoma thickness and ulceration, but not level of invasion, to be used in the T classification; 2) the number of metastatic lymph nodes, rather than their gross dimensions, the delineation of microscopic versus macroscopic lymph node metastases, and presence of ulceration of the primary melanoma to be used in the N classification; 3) the site of distant metastases and the presence of elevated serum LDH, to be used in the M classification; 4) an upstaging of all patients with Stage I,II, and III disease when a primary melanoma is ulcerated; 5) a merging of satellite metastases around a primary melanoma and in-transit metastases into a single staging entity that is grouped into Stage III disease; and 6) a new convention for defining clinical and pathologic staging so as to take into account the new staging information gained from intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy. The AJC Melanoma Staging Committee invites comments and suggestions regarding this proposed staging system before a final recommendation is made.
Recently, gastroesophageal reflux (GER) has been found to contribute to many types of otolaryngologic pathology in infants and children. The complaints may be intermittent and unresponsive to usual therapies, such as antimicrobial treatments. A high index of suspicion for GER and for the concept of "silent" GER (GER without overt symptoms) is necessary for accurate diagnosis and treatment of otolaryngologic manifestations of GER in these patients. In this prospective historical cohort study, the records were reviewed from 101 children who underwent esophagoscopy and biopsy as a diagnostic test for GER at the time of other otolaryngologic procedures. Significant associations were found between the presence of histologic esophagitis and asthma, recurrent croup, cough, apnea, sinusitis, stridor, laryngomalacia, subglottic stenosis, posterior glottic erythema, and posterior glottic edema. There were no complications. Esophageal biopsy is a rapid, safe and effective diagnostic test for GER that should be considered at the time of other procedures in children with selected GER-associated problems.
BACKGROUND: Assessment of cytologic features that allow accurate classification of proliferative breast disease has been hampered by sampling errors when fine-needle aspirations have been compared with their corresponding histologic sections. METHODS: To allow for optimal cytohistologic correlation, 2 smears (1 hematoxylin and eosin-stained and 1 Diff-Quik-stained) were prepared from each of 98 breast biopsies without mass lesions and compared with the corresponding histologic sections of the scraped area. Each smear was reviewed in a blinded fashion and assessed for cellularity, background elements, cytoarchitectural features of cell groups, and nuclear features by 2 reviewers. Smears were then classified as nonproliferative breast disease (NPBD), proliferative breast disease without atypia (PBD) or with atypia (PBDA), or DCIS, based on review of the corresponding histologic sections. RESULTS: When comparing NPBD/PBD (n = 86) with PBDA/DCIS (n = 12), smears from PBDA/DCIS were significantly (by the Fisher exact test or Wilcoxon rank sum P values with adjustment for multiple comparisons) more likely to be cellular; contain single cells and necrosis; exhibit nuclear overlap and cytoplasmic vacuoles; have large nuclei, macronucleoli, pleomorphism, clumped chromatin, and hyperchromasia; and were less likely to have complex cell groups, monolayers, swirling, cohesion, and myoepithelial cells in epithelial sheets and the smear background. When NPBD (n = 53) and PBD (n = 33) were similarly compared, smears from PBD were more likely to exhibit larger and more complex cell groups, but they were otherwise similar to smears from NPBD. CONCLUSIONS: There are many cytologic features that will allow a distinction of NPBD/PBD from PBDA/DCIS, but relatively few that can aid in separating NPBD from PBD.