Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 440902

The right not to read.

Abstract

Skill in reading is desirable. However, the importance of reading may be overemphasized in schools. Reading skills are determined relatively and not absolutely. Thus, relatively poor readers will persist. Schools cannot eradicate individual differences. Biological makeup and societal pressures are the important factors in determining reading skill. Present methods of reading remediation are of questionable efficacy and are traumatic to some children. Time with its associated normal development succeeds in remediating the majority of children with dyslexia. Most poor readers eventually attain reading levels that enable them to comprehend the types of printed materials commonly encountered. If a child finds reading difficult or distasteful, that child should be encouraged to read but should have the right not to be forced to read.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R D Snyder. 1979. The right not to read.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/440902/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Children born after elective induction of labour.

A comparison was made between the performance at eight years of age of 63 children who were born after elective induction of labour, and 29 spontaneously born children. The children had been tested previously at five years of age. Tests of reading and arithmetic achievement, visuomotor coordination, aural-visual coordination, auditory discrimination, and behavioural rating scales were administered. On two of the 12 measures (reading comprehension and euroticism) the induced children performed better than the spontaneously born. On all other measures there were no significant differences. There appeared to be no evidence of specific learning disabilities or behavioural problems among the induced children.

Achievement