A comparison of the Wide Range Achievement Test and the Peabody Individual Achievement Test for educationally handicapped children.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Tested rural Michigan black (N = 60) and white (N = 60) children of variant academic achievement on the Minnesota Percepto-Diagnostic Test for visual-motor skill development. The test, which consists of six gestalt designs for the person to copy, includes four measures of such skill development: Degree of copied design rotation and errors of separation of circle-diamond, distortion of circle-diamond and distortion of dots. In general, analyses that statistically controlled for intellectual level indicated that race was not a significant variable in the relationship of achievement level and visual-motor test performance. That is, such analyses resulted only in a significant achievement effect; low achievers, in comparison with high achievers, performed poorly on the copying test. Only with distortion of circle-diamond errors was a race interactive effect noted; i.e., black low achievers had significantly more errors than black high achievers, white low achievers or white high achievers. Results were discussed in relation to environmental determinants and symptomatology correlates.
To examine the implications of differences in reflection-impulsivity for later academic achievement, 70 children were administered the Matching Familiar Figures test (MFF) in grade 4 and the Comprehensive Tests of Basic Skills (CTBS) in grades 4, 5, and 6. Children identified as reflective based on grade 4 MFF performance scored significantly higher on the CTBS achievement battery at all grade levels than those classified as impulsive. However, the 2 groups did not differ on the grade 5 or grade 6 achievement measures when scores were adjusted for initial differences in grade 4 CTBS. Similarly, while each of the continuous variables MFF error score and MFF response latency was significantly predictive of grade 5 and grade 6 achievement test scores, neither of the MFF variables significantly improved the prediction of academic performance when current level of achievement was statistically accounted for. Sex differences in the relations between the MFF variables and the achievement measures were identified; MFF error score was more strongly related to later academic achievement for boys than for girls, while MFF response latency was a better predictor of academic achievement for girls than for boys.
To compare the memory function and perception of culturally deprived achievers with underachievers, 36 culturally deprived children were assigned to one of two groups according to their achievement level, in relation to their age and IQ. Underachievers were children achieving 6 mo. or more below expected level. Achievers were children achieving within at least 5 mo. of expected level. All subjects were between the ages of 8 and 12 yr. and were in Grades 4, 5, or 6. Four tests were administered, the Block Design and Digit Span subtests of the WISC, Memory-for-Designs, and the Minnesota Percepto-Diagnostic Test. The two groups did not differ on the first three tests, but the achievers performed significantly better on the last test than the underachievers. It was speculated that the differences were related to level of motor execution.
This study examined the correlations between academic achievement and factor specific, as well as global, measures of self-concept for 314 fourth and sixth grade boys and girls divided into grade level groups with and without Spanish surnames. The Primary Self-Concept Inventory was used to measure self-concept on six scales: physical size, emotional state, peer acceptance, helpfulness, success, and student-self. A global self-concept score was derived by totaling the scores on the six scales. Achievement was measured as total score on the Comprehensive Tests of Basic Skills. The two specific measures of self-concept that were most reflective of school performance, success and student-self, tended to show low positive correlations with achievement. The remaining specific measures, as well as the global measure, tended to show no relationship to achievement. These results suggest that an area specific model of self-concept is more useful than a global or undifferentiated model. Further, the low correlations between school related self-concept and achievement suggest that, as a group, students frequently have rather inaccurate academic self-concepts.
Previous work has shown high self-esteem to be related to an internal locus of control (LOC) orientation. Both have been shown to be related to academic achievement. It was hypothesized that LOC and self-esteem are each independently related to achievement, and that these relationships may vary according to the sex of the child and the measure of achievement used. Subjects were 113 ten-year-old, fourth grade children, 60 males and 53 females. They were administered questionnaire measures of LOC and self-esteem (Nowicki-Strickland and Piers-Harris). An internal LOC orientation was significantly related to greater academic achievement and high self-esteem. Males' LOC scores were related to grade point averages and not achievement test scores, while the reverse held for females. Differential socialization of females from males might account for the lack of a relationship between grades and LOC.
BACKGROUND: Wealth-related inequalities affect cardiometabolic health worldwide, but their implications for cardiometabolic care and potentially preventable cardiovascular disease remain poorly understood. We aimed to quantify wealth-related inequalities in the care cascade for hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolaemia by wealth quintile, region, and sex. METHODS: In this cross-sectional, individual-level analysis, we analysed harmonised, nationally representative health examination surveys conducted in five WHO regions. Adults aged 18 years or older with data on age, sex, wealth, and at least one cardiometabolic outcome were eligible. All variables in the surveys were obtained from standardised in-person examinations. We evaluated hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolaemia and applied a care cascade of disease awareness, treatment, and control for each condition uniformly across all surveys. Disease status was defined from measured biomarkers, self-reported diagnosis, or current medication; awareness and treatment were based on self-reported information, and control on measured biomarkers. Each indicator was expressed as the proportion of all individuals with the corresponding condition. Socioeconomic position was assessed using household wealth indices derived within each survey, and participants were ranked within each country and categorised into country-specific quintiles (quintile 1 to quintile 5), with quintile 1 including those with the least household wealth. Inequality was quantified by the quintile 5 minus quintile 1 difference, the slope index of inequality (SII), and relative index of inequality (RII). Predicted 10-year cardiovascular risk was estimated with the Globorisk equations, and trial-derived relative risk reductions were applied to estimate achievable absolute risk reduction. The ASANDE consortium is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07427355). FINDINGS: We analysed data from 109 surveys conducted in 76 countries between 2002 and 2024. 315 403 (65·9%) of 478 947 survey participants with available data were included in this analysis (median age 40 years [IQR 30-52], 185 209 [58·7%] women, and 130 194 [41·3%] men). Inequalities widened progressively across the care cascade in all regions and were most pronounced for disease control. Pooled across regions, the SII for control was 4·4% (95% CI 2·4-6·4) for hypertension (RII 1·1, 1·1-1·2), 4·8% (0·6-9·0) for diabetes (RII 1·1, 1·0-1·2), and 6·5% (3·8-9·2) for hypercholesterolaemia (RII 1·1, 1·0-1·1). However, regional patterns varied substantially. In the region of the Americas, disease control consistently favoured wealthier individuals (SII 9·2% for hypertension, 4·8-13·5; RII 1·2, 1·1-1·3). In the African region, coverage was uniformly low, and the largest absolute inequality favoured individuals with the least wealth, particularly for hypercholesterolaemia treatment (SII -37·6%, -49·7 to -25·5; RII 0·6, 0·5 to 0·7). Baseline cardiovascular risk was higher in individuals with the least wealth than among the wealthiest (13·6% vs 12·2%), but achievable absolute risk reduction was correlated with baseline risk rather than with treatment coverage: achievable reduction was greatest in the European Region (3·9%) and lowest in the Africa region (2·5%). Across all regions, achievable absolute risk reduction was greater in men than in women (4·6% vs 3·5% in the European region). INTERPRETATION: The populations with the largest treatment gaps are not necessarily those that could achieve the greatest absolute reduction in cardiovascular risk through treating individuals who are currently untreated. In settings where coverage is uniformly low, expanding the supply of care matters more than redistributing access to it. Moreover, because socioeconomic inequalities widen after diagnosis, screening alone is unlikely to reduce disparities unless accompanied by sustained access to treatment. Policy should prioritise overall population health over maximise equity within the population. FUNDING: None.
The experiment is a partial replication of a study conducted by Trope. It investigates the effects of two person characteristics (achievement motive and perceived own ability) and two task characteristics (difficulty and diagnostic value about own ability) on choice among achievement tasks. In accordance with the results of Trope, it was found that high-diagnostic tasks were preferred to low-diagnostic tasks, independent of their difficulty. Trope's finding that high resultant achievers choose high-diagnostic tasks over low-diagnostic tasks to a greater extent than low resultant achievers was not replicated. However, the perceived degree of own ability affected choice behavior: When easy and difficult tasks were both high in diagnosticity, subjects high in perceived ability preferred difficult over easy tasks, whereas subjects low in perceived ability preferred easy over difficult tasks. From this latter finding it is concluded that a self-informational conception of choice behavior has to include the subjective probability of success at tasks as a determinant of choice, in addition to objective difficulty and diagnostic value.
We have studied the relationship between overachievement (defined as high school achievement in relation to intelligence) and catecholamine output (adrenaline and noradrenaline). The subjects were 176 children aged 13 yr. Adrenaline and noradrenaline excretions were measured in (1) a neutral situation (attending a nonexciting film), and (2) in an achievement-demanding situation. In the achievement-demanding situation, overachieving boys had much higher adrenaline excretion levels than the other boys. This difference was not found for girls. For boys, overachievement in combination with overambition (as rated by teachers) was related to a higher output of both adrenaline and noradrenaline in an achievement-demanding situation.
Physical maturity, peer relations, academic success and school adaptiveness self-concept and self-esteem measures were correlated with reading, language, mathematics, and composite achievement scores for 26 male and 48 female junior high school students. Academic success self-concept was significantly correlated with each of the achievement measures. Peer relations self-concept and self-esteem correlated with language, math, and composite achievement. Academic success self-esteem measures did not correlate with any of the measures of achievement.
The purpose of this study was to compare the relative effectiveness of two measures commonly used to predict school achievement of black and white deaf children. The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised and the Hiskey-Nebraska Test of Learning Aptitude correlated significantly with Stanford Achievement Test scores for 23 black children but not for 36 white. Even though the groups differed significantly in WISC-R Performance IQ, Hiskey learning quotient, and in CA, they did not differ in achievement level. While the WISC-R and Hiskey appear to have some predictive validity for the black sample, the findings of no differences in achievement suggest little practical validity of these measures for grouping or placement or for making administrative or instructional decisions.