Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 431250

Tuning fork decay.

Abstract

Tuning fork tests are used routinely by many otologists. A different group of otologists find the tests inconsistent and unreliable. This controversy has probably developed because the audiometer has replaced the tuning fork in hearing measurement. As a result, the art of use of the tuning fork is poorly learned. This study examines decay, one of the physical parameters of tuning forks. Measurements of acoustic (sound wave) and vibration (stem movement) decay were made. Alteration in decay due to pressure changes on the fork stem were studied. Acoustic signals were generated in an anechoic chamber. Vibration measurements were obtained using an artificial mastoid. Analysis of the signals was accomplished by a system of amplifiers, filters, tape recorders, and a graphic recorder. Tuning fork sound decay is a property of the instrument which occurs every time the fork is struck. The decay is a constant in decibels per second. The acoustic mode and the vibration mode decay at similar rates for the same fork. The strike frequency (a higher frequency than the fundamental produced when the fork is struck) also has a constant decay rate in decibels per second, and it is reported here for the first time. Force of 800 gm. and less applied to the bottom of the stem in vibration measurement caused minimal decay constant changes. When the physical parameters of the tuning fork (including this information on damping) are fully studied, tuning fork testing should become more of a science and less of an art.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G W Miller. 1979. Tuning fork decay.. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-197903000-00014

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Improvement in early detection of congenital hearing impairment due to universal newborn hearing screening.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) is effective in increasing the number of children whose hearing impairment is detected early, i.e. within the first 6 months of life. It also investigated whether UNHS contributes most to the early detection of moderately and severely hearing-impaired newborns, as suggested by a recently published report. METHODS: The study consisted of a retrospective analysis of the data of all children born in Tyrol between 1980 and 1999 and having an at least moderate permanent hearing loss in the better ear. RESULTS: The findings are that since UNHS was introduced in some newborn nurseries in 1995, a substantially higher number of hearing-impaired children has been detected early. For the whole sample, the increase of the early detection rate is 39.9%, with a 95% confidence interval of 33.2-46.8% (P<0.0001). For moderate hearing loss the increase is 49.2 with a 95% confidence intervall of 39.6-58.8% (P=0.000). CONCLUSIONS: On the whole, our findings lend support to the view that UNHS is effective in early detection of congenital hearing impairment. We conclude that UNHS provides the greatest benefit for moderately hearing-impaired children who, otherwise, would have been detected last.

Hearing Disorders↗