Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 427384

Operative choledochoscopy.

Abstract

We have reported the results of 121 examinations with the rigid choledochoscope performed by 13 different surgeons between 1969 and 1977. Pre-exploratory choledochoscopy was performed in 48 patients with a diagnostic accuracy of 94 per cent. Post-exploratory choledochoscopy was used in 73 patients to define whether the common bile duct had been adequately cleared of stones. Fifty-one patients were correctly assessed as having a clear duct and unsuspected residual calculi were demonstrated by choledochoscopy in 13 patients. However, choledochoscopy failed to identify 9 patients with retained stones. The accuracy of post-exploratory choledochoscopy alone was 87 per cent and the accuracy of post-exploratory cholangiography was 82 per cent, but when choledochoscopy was combined with post-exploratory cholangiography there were no errors. We conclude that the addition of choledochoscopy to conventional radiological techniques is likely to reduce the incidence of residual calculi after choledochotomy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Kappas, J Alexander-Williams, M R Keighley, G T Watts. 1979. Operative choledochoscopy.. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800660311

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Gallstones.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Cholangiography

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the procedure of choice for laparoscopically skilled surgeons when dealing with both chronic and acute cholecystitis. When choledocholithiasis is encountered in the treatment of these patients the skilled laparoscopist has several treatment options available to treat the patient in one stage and avoid the morbidity of endoscopic sphincterotomy. Although still controversial, laparoscopic common bile duct exploration has been shown to be safe, applicable, and cost-effective in the treatment of choledocholithiasis. This report details several laparoscopic treatment alternatives for choledocholithiasis.

Cholangiography

Comparison of laparoscopic ultrasonography and fluorocholangiography in 300 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: This study compares laparoscopic ultrasonography to fluorocholangiography in detecting common bile duct (CBD) stones and delineating biliary anatomy. METHODS: A prospective nonrandomized study of 300 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a university hospital was performed. After port placement but before dissection, laparoscopic ultrasonography of the extrahepatic CBD was performed in both transverse and longitudinal planes. Cystic duct fluorocholangiography was attempted in all patients. RESULTS: Of 300 patients, CBD stones were detected in 26 (9%) with 25 of these (96%) detected on laparoscopic ultrasonography. Sonography identified the location and size of the CBD as well as anomalous anatomy prior to dissection. No CBD injuries were encountered. End-fire transducers were easier to use than rigid or flexible side-fire transducers; all gave excellent image quality. CONCLUSIONS: In this large study, laparoscopic ultrasonography and fluorocholangiography were equally sensitive in detecting CBD stones. Sonography delineates the biliary anatomy noninvasively and does not require dissection or opening of the biliary system. Laparoscopic ultrasonography may improve the safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, especially in cases of acute inflammation or distorted anatomy.

Cholangiography