Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cholangiography”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1996

Cholangiography before biliary surgery: single-shot MR cholangiography versus intravenous cholangiography.

PURPOSE: To compare depiction of the biliary tract with magnetic resonance (MR) and intravenous cholangiography before biliary surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intravenous cholangiograms and heavily T2-weighted single-shot MR images in 60 patients with biliary calculi were compared prospectively. Images obtained with each technique were independently assessed for depiction of anatomy and calculi. RESULTS: The gallbladder was adequately visualized with intravenous cholangiography in 77% of patients and with MR cholangiography in 88%. Rates for visualization of the common bile duct were 97% and 100%, respectively; for the cystic duct, 27% and 75%; and intrahepatic ducts, 28% and 77%. With either technique, calculi in the gallbladder were correctly predicted as solitary or multiple in approximately 80% of patients. Five cases of common bile duct calculi were correctly predicted with this technique, two cases with cystic duct calculi were depicted with only MR cholangiography. CONCLUSION: Single-shot MR cholangiography may replace intravenous cholangiography for visualization of the biliary tract. However, the delineation of tiny gallbladder calculi and shrunken gallbladders with thickened bile is limited.

Bile Duct Diseases↗
PubMed1997

Analysis of biliary drainage in the caudate lobe of the liver: comparison of three-dimensional CT cholangiography and rotating cine cholangiography.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the bile duct anatomy of the caudate lobe without disease involvement with use of three-dimensional (3D) cholangiography and to compare the usefulness of this technique with that of rotating cine cholangiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 12 patients with obstructive jaundice but without lesions at the hepatic hilum who underwent percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage, serial examination was performed with cine cholangiography and helical computed tomography (CT). From helical CT scans, 3D cholangiograms were reconstructed. Cine and 3D cholangiograms were evaluated and compared simultaneously. RESULTS: In the 12 patients, 40 branches of the caudate lobe were detected with 3D cholangiography (mean, 3.3 branches per patient), while 31 were detected with cine cholangiography (mean, 2.6 branches per patient). The difference in detection rate was significant (P < .01). Nine (23%) of 40 branches were detected with 3D cholangiography alone, and all 31 branches detected with cine cholangiography were also detected with 3D cholangiography. CONCLUSION: 3D cholangiography was superior to cine cholangiography in assessment of bile duct anatomy of the caudate lobe of the liver because 3D cholangiography eliminated the overlap of different branches of the bile duct.

Aged↗
PubMed1976

A randomized trial of percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography with the Chiba needle versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for bile duct visualization in jaundice.

Sixty consecutive patients, who were deeply jaundiced or in whom intravenous cholangiography had failed, were randomized to retrograde endoscopic cholangiography or percutaneous transheptic cholangiograhy with the "skinny" Chiba needle technique. Twenty-eight patients were assigned to retrograde cholangiography, which succeeded in 17 (65%). Percutaneous cholangiography was successful in 16 (50%) of the remaining 32 patients. When patients in whom the first procedure was unsuccessful were reinvestigated by the alternative technique, retrograde cholangiograms were obtained in 13 (81%) of 16, and percutaneous cholangiograms in 8 (73%) of 11. Thus, one or the other technique was successful in 54 (90%) of 60 patients. When the results were analyzed separately for extrahepatic (29 patients) or intrahepatic (31 patients) cholestasis, percutaneous cholangiography was successful in 95% of patients with extrahepatic cholestasis but in only 25% with intrahepatic cholestasis. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography successded in 63% of patients with extrahepatic and 76% with intrahepatic causes of cholestasis. Complications occurred only in patients with extrahepatic cholestasis. Cholangitis and septicemia occurred in 1 patient after retrograde cholangiography and in 2 after the percutaneous technique. An intraperitoneal bile leak occurred in one other patient after percutaneous cholangiography. Percutaneous cholangiography with the narrow needle is a simple, inexpensive, and reliable method for demonstrating the biliary system and is usually successful when an extrahepatic cause of cholestasis is present. The occurrence of serious complications in patients with extrahepatic cholestasis, despite prophylactic antibiotics, makes provision for early surgery mandatory after both techniques.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Diagnosis of common bile duct stones by intravenous cholangiography: prediction by ultrasound and liver function tests compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.

BACKGROUND: Routine intravenous cholangiography using the safer contrast medium, meglumine iotroxate, may be a useful investigation prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the detection of suspected common bile duct stones. We compared this with endoscopic cholangiography. METHODS: Eighty-one consecutive nonjaundiced patients (mean age 62 years; range 20 to 90) with suspected common bile duct stones referred for endoscopic cholangiography to one center underwent intravenous cholangiography that was considered positive if it detected ductal stones. The ability of ultrasound scans and liver function tests to predict ductal stones was also assessed. RESULTS: Sixty patients had both endoscopic and intravenous cholangiograms performed. Thirteen out of 27 patients with ductal stones confirmed by endoscopic cholangiography had positive intravenous cholangiograms, and 29 out of 30 with no stones had negative intravenous cholangiograms. The sensitivity for intravenous cholangiography was 48%, specificity 97%, positive predictive value 93%, negative predictive value 67%, and accuracy 73%. For ultrasound scans the positive predictive value was 69%; negative predictive value was 78%. For liver function tests the positive predictive value was 68%; negative predictive value was 93%. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous cholangiography cannot be recommended instead of endoscopic cholangiography except in situations where the latter is not readily available. Ultrasound and liver function tests are useful in predicting ductal stones.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Choledocholithiasis: comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients with suspected choledocholithiasis underwent non-breath-hold, heavily T2-weighted, respiratory-triggered turbo spin-echo MR cholangiography. They then underwent ERC within 5 hours. The results of the two procedures were compared in 45 patients. RESULTS: The absence of ductal dilatation was shown in 16 patients at MR cholangiography and at ERC. MR cholangiography showed common duct dilatation in 28 of the 29 patients with dilatation shown at ERC. MR cholangiography helped correctly identify 18 of the 19 patients with choledocholithiasis and 22 of the 26 patients without choledocholithiasis. Sensitivity with MR cholangiography was 95%, specificity was 85%, positive predictive value was 82%, and negative predictive value was 96%. Two of the false-positive findings were due to pneumobilia. CONCLUSION: Non-breath-hold MR cholangiography is as accurate for the evaluation of choledocholithiasis as ERC.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Intravenous cholangiography with helical CT: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.

PURPOSE: To determine whether helical computed tomography (CT) performed during intravenous cholangiography can provide useful images of the biliary tree and to compare this technique with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen adult patients with clinically suspected biliary disease who were referred for ERC were first examined with helical CT cholangiography performed 75 minutes after intravenous infusion of 100 mL of 10.3% iodipamide meglumine. RESULTS: Helical CT cholangiography revealed good opacification of the biliary tree in 13 of 14 patients with serum bilirubin levels less than 2 mg/dL (34 mumol/L) and poor opacification in three of four patients with levels greater than 2 mg/dL. In six of seven patients with choledocholithiasis, the diagnosis was made by means of helical CT cholangiography. CONCLUSION: Helical CT cholangiography may be a clinically useful method for visualization of the biliary tree in some patients with suspected biliary disease with normal bilirubin levels and in patients in whom attempts at ERC fail.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography in patients with suspected obstructive biliary disease: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic potential of spiral computed tomography (CT) performed after the administration of cholangiographic contrast material (spiral CT cholangiography) in patients with suspected obstructive biliary disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After infusion of meglumine iodoxamate, 29 patients underwent upper abdominal spiral CT with subsequent three-dimensional rendering of the biliary tract. In 27 patients, the presence, site, and extent of biliary obstruction were compared with that at endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). RESULTS: Spiral CT cholangiography correctly depicted biliary obstruction in 14 of 27 patients, with no false-positive or false-negative cases. In one patient, the precise length of a common bile duct stenosis could not be assessed with spiral CT cholangiography. ERC demonstrated intrahepatic ductal stenoses more clearly in two patients. In two patients with hilar cholangiocarcinomas, spiral CT cholangiography depicted undrained areas not seen with ERC. CONCLUSION: Spiral CT cholangiography allows accurate assessment of the biliary system in patients with suspected obstructive biliary disease.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Breath-hold MR cholangiography with snapshot techniques: prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.

PURPOSE: To compare findings with magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography with rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) and half-Fourier acquisition with single-shot turbo spin-echo (hereafter, half Fourier RARE) snapshot imaging techniques to those with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Heavily T2-weighted thick-section (RARE) and thin-section (half-Fourier RARE) MR cholangiography were performed prospectively, on a 1.5-T imager, in the biliary tree of 61 consecutive patients before ERC. Findings at ERC were considered the standard of reference. The radiologist and endoscopist were blinded to each other's report. On- and off-site MR cholangiographic readings were performed to detect stones (n = 24), biliary dilatation (n = 34), or stenosis (n = 36). RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of MR cholangiography, respectively, calculated on a lesion-by-lesion basis, were 92.3% and 95.8% for cholangiolithiasis, 94.1% and 92.6% for duct dilatation, and 88.8% and 84.0% for stenosis. With snapshot MR cholangiography, on a patient-by-patient basis, differentiation between normal (n = 15) and abnormal (n = 46) results yielded a sensitivity of 92.4%, a specificity of 83.4%, and a positive predictive value of 95.6%. Pitfalls were caused by flow artifacts, compression by vessels, and low contrast between calculi and surrounding parenchyma. CONCLUSION: Snapshot MR cholangiography allowed noninvasive, accurate detection of biliary stones, strictures, and dilatation similar to that with ERC. Discrepancies regarding low-grade dilatation and strictures had no clinical relevance at retrospective review.

Bile Duct Diseases↗
PubMed1986

Pre-operative infusion cholangiography compared to routine operative cholangiography at elective cholecystectomy.

Routine operative cholangiography (group 1) was compared with pre-operative intravenous infusion cholangiography and selective operative cholangiography (group 2) in 200 patients subjected to elective cholecystectomy. All patients were examined with pre-operative intravenous infusion cholangiography. In group 1 patients, this examination was not made available to the surgeon and not used in any way except for a later analysis. Thirteen patients had to be excluded for different reasons. In group 1, normal operative cholangiograms were obtained in 82/94 cases. Choledocholithotomy was performed in 7/12 cases, choledochotomy in 2/12 and no exploration in 3/12 cases. In group 2, pathological or inconclusive infusion cholangiograms were demonstrated in 17/91 cases. Choledocholithotomy was performed in 11/17 cases. One of 17 patients was subjected to choledochotomy only. In 5/17 patients, no exploration was carried out because of normal operative cholangiography. No residual or retained stone/s have been revealed during a follow-up period of 1 year. The general clinical outcome in the two groups of patients was similar. Significantly shorter operative time was an important advantage of the strategy in group 2 patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1982

Operative cholangiography. The case for selective instead of routine operative cholangiography.

The role of routine operative cholangiography was studied prospectively in 124 surgical patients undergoing cholecystectomy over a 23-month period. The reliability of preoperative and operative clinical risk factors for common bile duct (CBD) pathology were correlated with the operative and cholangiographic findings. Though several of these clinical risk factors (jaundice, dilated CBD, elevated alkaline phosphotase) were present in over 80 per cent of the patients with CBD pathology, none had an overall predictive accuracy greater than 40 per cent. The operative cholangiogram was superior to the clinical criteria in distinguishing patients with common bile duct pathology from those patients with disease limited to the gallbladder provided that a dilated CBD was not considered an absolute indication for CBD exploration. Operative cholangiography was the best overall screening test for identifying patients with CBD pathology. A subgroup of patients was identified in whom this screening test was not needed. Of our study group, 44 per cent had no clinical risk factors for CBD pathology present, and no unsuspected CBD calculi were found by the use of routine cholangiography in any of these patients. Based on this clinical study and a critical review of the current literature, adequate evidence to support the policy of routine operative cholangiography was not found. In fact, a policy of selective cholangiography performed only on patients clinically at risk of having CBD pathology appears indicated. This approach would not only decrease the incidence of negative CBD exploration, but also would reduce the overall cost of cholecystectomy by 52 million dollars annually without any increase in patient risk.

Cholangiography↗
PubMed1993

[Cholecysto-cholangiography as an alternative to cystic duct cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy].

Intraoperative cholangiography may be an important adjunct to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in order to prevent bile duct lesions. Laparoscopic cannulation of the cystic duct can be very difficult and time consuming. We therefore developed a simple technique of cholecystocholangiography. The gallbladder is punctured and filled with contrast medium after having localised the cystic duct and put a metal clip as a landmark. The study included 52 patients having either cholecystocholangiography or cystic duct cholangiography. In 13 out of 26 patients (50%) cholecystocholangiography failed because of obstruction of the cystic duct. The cholangiograms showed complete filling of the bile ducts in 5 (19%) and incomplete visualisation in 8 cases (31%). Cystic duct cholangiography showed significantly better results with good delineation of the biliary tree in 19 cases (73%). Five cholangiograms were suboptimal (19%) and only 2 studies failed (8%). The relation between cystic duct and common bile duct was clearly visible in 24 cases (92%) with cystic duct cholangiography compared with 13 cases (50%) with cholecystocholangiography. Cystic duct cholangiography has better success rates in delineating biliary anatomy in order to prevent bile duct injury. Cholecystocholangiography is a good alternative in cases where the cystic duct cannot be initially visualized.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Pre-operative intravenous cholangiography as an alternative to routine operative cholangiography in elective cholecystectomy.

Pre-operative intravenous cholangiography as an alternative to routine operative cholangiography at elective cholecystectomy has been assessed in a retrospective manner in 286 patients. Most of the examinations were technically satisfactory (94.7%) and of these 1.8% proved incorrect. A small number of patients developed transient skin rashes (1.3%), the only side effect recorded. Preoperative intravenous cholangiography offers an alternative to routine operative cholangiography with the potential saving of both operating staff and radiologists' time, without sacrificing accuracy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1984

Intravenous computed tomographic cholangiography in acute cholecystitis. A comparison with conventional cholangiography.

Forty-nine patients with clinical signs of acute cholecystitis underwent conventional and computed tomographic cholangiography. Among 39 patients with signs of contrast medium in the biliary system at both examinations there was a diagnostic discrepancy in only one patient. Conventional radiography demonstrated cholecystopathy in this patient while contrast medium in the gallbladder and an acute pancreatitis were found at computed tomography. Ten patients with an indeterminate conventional cholangiography had a conclusive computed tomographic examination. Twenty of 30 patients with an abnormal computed tomographic cholangiography underwent cholecystectomy and all had diseased gallbladders. All 17 patients with histopathologically confirmed acute cholecystitis had signs of subserosal edema and/or changes in the omental fatty tissue adjacent to the gallbladder at computed tomography. A layer of tissue of water-density adjacent to the gallbladder and/or changes in omental fatty tissue were also seen in one patient with congestive heart failure and in one with a penetrating duodenal ulcer. None of the 19 patients with a normal computed tomographic cholangiography had a proven acute cholecystitis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1995

Intravenous cholangiography and operative cholangiography: implications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

There has been a resurgence of interest in the potential role of intravenous cholangiography with the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A retrospective review of a historical group of 185 patients undergoing cholecystectomy in whom the results of both intravenous cholangiography (IVC) and routine operative cholangiography (OC) were available was carried out. The common bile duct (CBD) was explored in 31 (16.7%) patients and choledocholithiasis confirmed in 25 (81%). IVC had shown calculi in 17 of these 25 patients (sensitivity, 68%) whereas OC demonstrated calculi in 24 (sensitivity 96%). Out of the six negative duct explorations, IVC suggested stones in two patients (specificity 66%) and OC in four patients (specificity 33%). Ultrasound scan had a sensitivity of only 48% for bile duct calculi. The accuracy of IVC was 68% and OC 84%. Intravenous cholangiography has no routine role in the preoperative assessment in patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy. In high-risk patients, alternative imaging techniques should be used.

Case-Control Studies↗
PubMed1982

Liver biopsy and percutaneous cholangiography using a posterior approach. 500 needle biopsies and 121 cholangiographies.

A technique of posterior percutaneous liver biopsy and cholangiography was used in 500 liver biopsies and 121 cholangiographic examinations of the biliary tract. It provided a successful liver biopsy in 98.6 percent of cases and was associated with a less than 2 percent complication rate. Successful cholangiography was possible in all patients with dilated ducts and in 87 percent of patients with normal undilated ducts. Percutaneous cholangiography was associated with a 5 percent complication rate. The advantages of this technique are that it can be performed by relatively inexperienced physicians with minimal risk of hemo- or choleperitoneum. It has a low failure rate and can be performed in obese patients or patients with coagulation defects. The route of entry eliminates the risk of injury to the gallbladder or colon. Due to the posterior position, this technique can be used in relatively uncooperative patients.

Biliary Tract Diseases↗
PubMed1992

Precholecystectomy endoscopic cholangiography and stone removal is not superior to cholecystectomy, cholangiography, and common duct exploration.

Thirty-four patients with suspected common bile duct stones were randomized to undergo endoscopic cholangiography and stone removal prior to open cholecystectomy or to have open cholecystectomy, operative cholangiography, and common bile duct exploration. Sixteen underwent the first protocol, and 18 the second. Analysis of the ability to clear stones from the common bile duct, morbidity, mortality, hospital stay, length of operation, and hospital cost showed no difference in outcome between patients treated by either method. These data suggest there is neither an advantage nor a disadvantage to treating patients with suspected duct stones by precholecystectomy endoscopic cholangiography and stone removal.

Adult↗
PubMed1980

[Transvenous cholangiography and percutaneous transhepatic fine needle cholangiography (author's transl)].

The comparison of transvenous cholangiography (TVC) in 82 patients with percutaneous transhepatic fine needle cholangiography (PTFC) in 84 patients showed that TVC must be considered obsolete due to the complicated procedure with low success rate (56.9%). In one case it led to septicaemia followed by death. The total success rate was 84.5% in PTFC performed with an ultrathin needle (0.5 mm diameter); congested biliary ducts were successfully punctured in 87.9% and noncongested ducts in 72.2%. Severe complications consisted of one case of intraabdominal bleeding and one biliary extravasation. As shown in animal experiments, the superficial parenchymal lesion has not always the shape of a point. High accuracy also in noncongested biliary tracts and low mortality make PTFC superior to TVC and conventional percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography.

Child, Preschool↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and perioperative cholangiography: to use both, one or none?].

ERCP and cholangiography during surgery (SC) are compared in regard to their usefulness in 100 patients in whom cholecystectomy was performed because of gallstones. The biliary tree was visualized in 73% of patients with ERCP and in 85% with SC 20 patients presented stones in the common bile duct (CBD), of these 19 had previous signs or symptoms clinical history, laboratory, ultrasonography) that suggested this diagnosis, of the rest of the patients (80) without CBD stones only 7 had signs or symptoms that suggested this diagnosis, 4 of these patients had normal cholangiograms and 3 had "odditis". So in 73 patients without symptoms suggestive of CBD stones, preoperative or intraoperative cholangiography was probably not necessary. We consider that it is convenient to perform ERCP only in those patients with gallstones who have clinical findings suggestive of CBD or pancreatic problems (history, laboratory, ultrasonography). Cholangiography during cholecystectomy would be indicated in patients with small gallstones, the finding during operation of a dialted CBD or palpation of stones in the CBD and when ERCP fails in a patient with suggestive symptoms or when there is doubts with the ERCP findings.

Adolescent↗