subject

Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors: explore 4 source-linked works published from 2026 to 2026, with original documents and citations.

This collection is a preview while coverage and quality are evaluated.

Search within this collection

Coverage and selection

Includes records with this source-supplied label or an explicit phrase match in their metadata. Matches indicate a mention, not proof that a paper uses a method or tests a material. Source versions are consolidated by DOI.

Sources: pubmed. Collection updated 2026-09-16. Counts describe this index, not the complete source archives.

PubMed2026

Short-term safety of dual versus single antiplatelet therapy in flow diversion for distal intracranial aneurysms: results from the DART trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Flow diverters (FDs) have become one of the primary treatments for intracranial aneurysms (IAs). However, their use in distal IA has been associated with higher complication rates compared with other techniques. The development of coated FDs, in combination with novel antiplatelet regimens, offers promising strategies to improve the safety profile of FDs in this context. This trial aimed to compare mono antiplatelet therapy (MAPT) using prasugrel versus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and prasugrel for the treatment of distal IA using the p48 MW HPC FD (WallabyPhenox). METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, parallel-group, single-blind, non-inferiority randomized trial. Between February 2021 and February 2025, 140 patients were enrolled. After excluding 11 patients, 129 were included in the final analysis. The primary endpoint was the absence of new neurological deficits, defined as no shift in the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. The secondary endpoint was the incidence of any stroke. RESULTS: At the 30-day follow-up, 66 patients (98.5%) in the MAPT group and 59 patients (95.2%) in the DAPT group showed no new neurological deficits. With a predefined non-inferiority margin of 5%, the difference of 3.35% confirmed the non-inferiority of MAPT compared with DAPT (p=0.002). The incidence of any stroke was 4/67 (5.9%) in the MAPT group and 6/62 (9.6%) in the DAPT group (p=0.431). CONCLUSION: Prasugrel monotherapy for the treatment of distal IAs using the p48 MW HPC was non-inferior to DAPT within the first 30 days following treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-3q9zb73. UTN code: U1111-1290-2489. Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital das Clínicas de Ribeirão Preto - Universidade de São Paulo. CAAE number: 29848720.0.1001.5440.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Clopidogrel vs Aspirin According to Diabetes Mellitus: A Prespecified Analysis of the SMART-CHOICE 3 Trial.

BACKGROUND: Recent trials support the superior efficacy of clopidogrel compared to aspirin monotherapy after completion of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, limited evidence is available in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of clopidogrel vs aspirin monotherapy according to the presence of DM. METHODS: This was a prespecified analysis of the SMART-CHOICE 3 trial, which was a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing clopidogrel vs aspirin monotherapy in patients with complex coronary lesions or high-risk clinical characteristics. From August 2020 to July 2023, a total of 5,506 patients who underwent PCI and standard DAPT duration and had complex coronary lesions, DM, or previous myocardial infarction, were randomized to clopidogrel or aspirin monotherapy groups. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), which was defined as a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or stroke. RESULTS: Of 5,506 patients, 2,089 had DM (1,039 in the clopidogrel group and 1,050 in the aspirin group). At a median follow-up of 2.3 years (IQR: 1.6-3.0 years), DM patients had a higher risk of MACCE compared to non-DM patients (6.8% vs 4.7%; HR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.10-1.87; P = 0.008). Clopidogrel showed a significantly lower risk of MACCE than aspirin in DM patients (4.5% vs 9.1%; HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.38-0.86; P = 0.008). There was no significant interaction between DM and antiplatelet monotherapy regarding MACCE (P for interaction = 0.124). The risk of bleeding was comparable between the 2 groups in DM patients (2.9% vs 2.9%; HR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.57-1.95; P = 0.855). CONCLUSIONS: Among DM patients who completed the standard duration of DAPT after PCI, clopidogrel monotherapy was associated with a lower risk of a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, and stroke compared with aspirin monotherapy, without increased rates of bleeding. There was no significant interaction between DM and antiplatelet monotherapy with respect to MACCE. (SMART-CHOICE 3 [SMart Angioplasty Research Team: CHoice of Optimal Anti-Thrombotic Strategy in Patients Undergoing Implantation of Coronary Drug-Eluting Stents 3]; NCT04418479).

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: A GRADE-assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a common atherosclerotic disorder characterized by progressive arterial narrowing in the limbs. This study aims to determine the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban, focusing on major cardiovascular events, limb outcomes, and bleeding risks. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized comparative studies that compared rivaroxaban, either alone or in combination with aspirin, to placebo or standard care such as antiplatelet therapy. Risk ratios and hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were pooled using R v4.5.1 with an appropriate random-effects model applied. Subgroup analyses were performed according to rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus rivaroxaban alone. RESULTS: A total of 39,991 participants across 6 studies were included. Compared with control, use of rivaroxaban was linked to a significant reduction in composite efficacy outcomes (relative risk [RR] = 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.91, P < 0.001), risk of acute limb ischemia (RR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.55-0.78, P < 0.001), and thromboembolism (RR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.38-0.97, P = 0.037). Although rivaroxaban plus aspirin failed to show a significant reduction in the risk of amputation, rivaroxaban alone reported a significant risk reduction (RR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.30-0.85, P = 0.003). However, its use was associated with a significantly higher risk of major bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.54, 95% CI 1.38-1.72, P < 0.001) and International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis-defined bleeding (RR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.19-1.76, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed for stroke, myocardial infarction, major adverse limb events, fatal bleeding, mortality, or cardiovascular mortality. CONCLUSION: Rivaroxaban-based therapy reduced the trial-defined composite efficacy outcome, acute limb ischemia, and thromboembolism in patients with PAD, but increased the risk of major bleeding. These findings support individualized use of rivaroxaban-based therapy in carefully selected patients, balancing ischemic and limb-protective benefits against bleeding risk.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

The effect of zalunfiban on high sensitivity cardiac troponin and the association with clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI.

BACKGROUND: Among individuals with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), a single subcutaneous injection of the short-acting glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blocker antagonist zalunfiban at first medical contact significantly improved the primary outcome including clinical endpoints. The impact of zalunfiban on Myocardial Infarction (MI) size and association with downstream outcomes remains unclear. METHODS: In a prespecified analysis, we studied results among study participants treated with 2 doses of zalunfiban who had core laboratory measurements concentrations of hs-cTnT. RESULTS: More elevated hs-cTnT concentrations at presentation were associated with less resolution of ST deviation (P = .006) and more frequent Q wave development (P < .001). At coronary angiography more elevated hs-cTnT at presentation was associated with higher thrombus grade and worse epicardial and myocardial perfusion (all P < .05). In multivariable analyses, higher hs-cTnT concentrations at 24 hours were associated with greater adjusted risk for all-cause death (odds ratio [OR] 1.83 per log unit increase; P = .03), cardiovascular death (OR 1.83 per log unit increase; P = .03), heart failure (OR 2.74 per log unit increase; P < .001) or the composite of death and heart failure (P < .001) by 30 days. At 24 hours, those treated with zalunfiban had lower hs-cTnT compared to placebo (P = .04) and across multiples ≥ 10 to ≥ 1,000 times elevation, treatment with zalunfiban resulted in smaller hs-cTnT determined MI size. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with STEMI, more elevated concentrations of hs-cTnT are associated with worse measures of reperfusion and higher-risk for short-term death or heart failure. A single dose of zalunfiban at first medical contact reduced MI size. TRIAL REGISTRATION: A phase 3 study of zalunfiban in subjects with ST-elevation MI (CELEBRATE); NCT04825743.

Humans↗

Compare source metadata on this page

Work	Published	Source identifier	Source
Short-term safety of dual versus single antiplatelet therapy in flow diversion for distal intracranial aneurysms: results from the DART trial.	2026-09-14	PMID 41120206	pubmed
Clopidogrel vs Aspirin According to Diabetes Mellitus: A Prespecified Analysis of the SMART-CHOICE 3 Trial.	2026-07-16	PMID 42461194	pubmed
Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: A GRADE-assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.	2026-07-14	PMID 42448029	pubmed
The effect of zalunfiban on high sensitivity cardiac troponin and the association with clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI.	2026-06-16	PMID 42303064	pubmed

These are bibliographic comparisons, not experimental rankings. Follow the original document for methods and conditions.