Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42711224

Targeting TP53 in triple-negative breast cancer: Molecular pathogenesis, therapeutic implications, and emerging pharmacological strategies.

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains a highly aggressive and therapeutically challenging subtype, defined by the absence of oestrogen, progesterone, and HER2 expression. Tumour Protein 53 (TP53) mutations represent the most frequent genetic alteration, occurring in over 80% of cases and driving tumour initiation, progression, and therapeutic resistance. Mutant p53 proteins not only lose canonical tumour-suppressive functions but also often acquire gain-of-function (GOF) oncogenic properties that promote metastasis, genomic instability, and resistance to mechanisms like ferroptosis. This review examines the biological role of TP53 in TNBC pathogenesis and evaluates emerging pharmacological strategies aimed at targeting these vulnerabilities. Key approaches include the pharmacological reactivation of mutant p53 using small molecules such as APR-246, COTI-2, and the mutation-specific reactivator rezatapopt (PC14586), which has shown significant clinical tumour reduction in Y220C-mutant patients. Other strategies involve targeted protein degradation, the exploitation of synthetic lethal interactions (e.g., Chk1 or Aurora kinase B inhibition), and the use of natural products like cryptolepine or piperine derivatives. Recent clinical evidence further highlights the potential of combining epigenetic agents like decitabine with chemotherapy in TP53-mutant populations. Integrating TP53 mutation status into biomarker-driven treatment paradigms is a pivotal step toward achieving precision oncology and improving clinical outcomes for patients with TNBC.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Barani Karikalan, Ye Htut Linn, Shiueh Lian Mok. 2026-09-08. Targeting TP53 in triple-negative breast cancer: Molecular pathogenesis, therapeutic implications, and emerging pharmacological strategies.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulcan.2026.04.016

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Precision Oncology in Hepatopancreatobiliary Cancer Surgery.

Advances in technology have allowed for the characterization of tumors at the genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic levels. There are well-established targets for biliary tract cancers, with exciting new targets emerging in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and potential targets in hepatocellular carcinoma. Taken together, these data suggest an important role for molecular profiling for personalizing cancer therapy in advanced disease and need for design of novel neoadjuvant studies to leverage these novel therapeutics perioperatively in the surgical patient.

Humans

Evolution of Precision Oncology, Personalized Medicine, and Molecular Tumor Boards.

With multiple molecular targeted therapies available for patients with cancer that correspond to a specific genetic alteration, the selection of the best treatment is essential to ensure therapeutic efficacy. Molecular tumor boards (MTBs) play a key role in this process to deliver personalized medicine to patients with cancer in a multidisciplinary manner. Historically, personalized medicine has been offered to patients with advanced cancer, but the incorporation of molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapy into the perioperative setting requires clinicians to understand the role of the MTB. Evidence is accumulating to support feasibility and survival benefit in patients treated with matched therapy.

Humans

Cost-Effectiveness and the Economics of Genomic Testing and Molecularly Matched Therapies.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of precision oncology can help guide value-driven care. Next-generation sequencing is increasingly cost-efficient over single gene testing because diagnostic algorithms require multiple individual gene tests to determine biomarker status. Matched targeted therapy is often not cost-effective due to the high cost associated with drug treatment. However, genomic profiling can promote cost-effective care by identifying patients who are unlikely to benefit from therapy. Additional applications of genomic profiling such as universal testing for hereditary cancer syndromes and germline testing in patients with cancer may represent cost-effective approaches compared with traditional history-based diagnostic methods.

Humans