Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42704497

Efficacy and safety of cannabinoid-based interventions for behavioral and cognitive symptoms in dementia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gabriel Caruso Novaes Tudella·Augusto Utida Klostermann·Giovana Menegucci·João Vitor Andrade Fernandes·João Pedro Gonçalves Pacheco
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Behavioral and cognitive symptoms are frequent in Alzheimer's disease and dementia, and available pharmacological options offer limited benefit. Cannabinoid-based therapies have been proposed as alternatives, but evidence remains inconclusive. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library through November 2025 for randomized controlled trials evaluating cannabinoids in Alzheimer's disease or dementia. Primary outcomes were agitation measured by the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) and neuropsychiatric symptoms assessed by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home version (NPI-NH). Secondary outcomes included cognition using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and adverse events. Standardized Mean Differences (SMDs) and Risk Ratios (RRs) were synthesized using random-effects (REML) and Bayesian random-effects models. Risk of bias was evaluated with RoB 2, and certainty of evidence with GRADE. RESULTS: Nine trials (334 participants) met inclusion criteria. Cannabinoids did not improve CMAI (SMD -0.58, 95% CI -1.71 to 0.55; I2 = 84%), NPI-NH total (SMD -0.02, 95% CI -1.00 to 0.96; I2 = 67%), NPI-NH agitation (SMD -0.44, 95% CI -1.45 to 0.57; I2 = 48%), or MMSE (SMD 0.86, 95% CI -16.33 to 18.06; I2 = 96%). Bayesian posterior estimates were close to zero, supporting the absence of effect. Leave-one-out analyses reduced heterogeneity only after excluding influential trials but did not alter results. Certainty of evidence was moderate for behavioral outcomes and low for cognition. Overall adverse events were similar to placebo, while somnolence was more frequent with cannabinoids (RR 2.03, 95% CI 1.29-3.20). CONCLUSIONS: Cannabinoid-based therapies do not improve agitation, neuropsychiatric symptoms, or cognition in Alzheimer's disease and increase somnolence.

Explore related subjects

HumansCannabinoidsDementiaPsychomotor AgitationAlzheimerCannabidiolCognitionMeta-AnalysisJournal ArticleSystematic ReviewReview

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Gabriel Caruso Novaes Tudella, Augusto Utida Klostermann, Giovana Menegucci, João Vitor Andrade Fernandes, João Pedro Gonçalves Pacheco. 2026-09-07. Efficacy and safety of cannabinoid-based interventions for behavioral and cognitive symptoms in dementia: systematic review and meta-analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-026-09347-z

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Cognition subjectHumans subjectJournal Article subjectJournal Article; Systematic Review; Meta-Analysis; Review resourceMeta-Analysis subjectSystematic reviews study

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Cannabis and cannabinoids for the treatment of mental and substance use disorders and symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental and observational studies.

BACKGROUND: Interest in cannabinoids for mental and substance use disorders is increasing. We examined experimental and observational evidence for treating these disorders and their symptoms. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42023467536). We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO to May 2025 for studies of cannabinoids in adults (≥18 years) with ADHD, anxiety, depression, PTSD, psychosis or Tourette syndrome, or alcohol, cannabis, opioid or tobacco use disorders. Two reviewers screened, extracted and assessed quality using a risk-of-bias tool and GRADE. RESULTS: We included 82 experimental and 118 observational studies. In RCTs, cannabinoids reduced anxiety symptoms (SMD=-0.40; 95% CI: -0.57, -0.23; I²=90%) and, in one small trial, PTSD symptoms (SMD=-2.60; 95% CI: -4.58, -0.62; n=20), with trivial-to-no effect on depression (SMD=-0.20; 95% CI: -0.43, 0.04; I²=91.6%), ADHD, psychosis and Tourette syndrome. Much anxiety and depression evidence came from symptoms measured as secondary outcomes in other primary conditions. Cannabinoids worsened cannabis use disorder severity in one RCT (SMD=2.35; 95% CI: 1.49, 3.21), with no effect on craving or withdrawal; evidence for alcohol, opioid and tobacco use disorders was very limited. Observational studies suggested improvements but had high risk of bias. The only significant safety finding was increased withdrawals due to adverse events with THC (OR=2.78; 95% CI: 1.66, 4.65). Certainty was predominantly very low. DISCUSSION: The evidence base shows very low certainty, high heterogeneity and methodological limitations, and is insufficient to support cannabinoids as first-line treatment. Signals for anxiety and PTSD are limited by indirectness and low certainty; no benefit was evident for depression; THC-related safety signals warrant careful consideration.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Pharmacokinetic Differences Between Fast-Acting, Standard, and Placebo Cannabis Edibles.

INTRODUCTION: Edibles have become the second-most used cannabis product in legal U.S. states, wherein 64% of cannabis consumers reported using edibles within the past year. Among expansions to the legal cannabis industry are the newly marketed "fast-acting" edible compounds, which may address many of the issues associated with edible use related to overdose and dose management. The study hypotheses were that fast-acting edibles would reach peak concentration significantly faster than standard edibles and placebo edibles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty participants completed three arms within-subjects designed study to test hypotheses. The three arms were ingestion of a (1) fast-acting edible, (2) a standard edible, and (3) a Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) terpene-derived placebo edible that was indistinguishable from the two THC-containing edibles. Blood plasma was analyzed for the presence of THC and THC analytes. The pharmacokinetic parameters tested were time to max concentration (Tmax), maximum concentration (Cmax), terminal half-life (t1/2), and area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Results supported study hypotheses in that Tmax was significantly faster for the fast-acting edible, observed 30 min post-ingestion and, on average, 30 min earlier than the Tmax for the standard edible. There were no significant differences between the fast-acting and standard edibles on Cmax, t1/2, and AUC; however, both the fast-acting and standard edibles were significantly different compared with the placebo across all pharmacokinetic parameters. DISCUSSION: The results indicate that the microencapsulation technology used to create the fast-acting edible enabled analyte concentrations to peak significantly faster compared to the standard and placebo edibles.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Culturally adapted post-diagnostic dementia support for South Asian people living with dementia and caregivers: a rapid review.

BACKGROUND: The number of minority ethnic people living with dementia (PLWD) in the UK is predicted to rise to 50 000 by 2026 and 172 000 by 2051. As the global population ages, there is a greater need to develop culturally appropriate post-diagnostic support for PLWD from minority ethnic backgrounds. METHODS: A rapid review was conducted of culturally adapted post-diagnostic dementia support for South Asian people with dementia and carers. Eight electronic databases were searched from inception until 16 September 2025. Databases included Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Excerpta Medica Database, MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Psychological Information, Turning Research Into Practice, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Social Policy and Practice and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Two reviewers independently screened the studies. Consistent with rapid review methods, no formal quality assessment of included studies was undertaken. The rapid review adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included. These included seven carer support programmes focusing on raising awareness and education on dementia and care. These interventions increased carers' knowledge of dementia and confidence in caregiving. Four studies reported on psychosocial interventions: Cognitive Stimulation Therapy, Cognitive Behaviour Therapy and Meditation Therapy, demonstrating benefits for caregiver burden and mental health. One study reported on service-level innovations through a South Asian link nurse, which improved access to services and facilitated the development of culturally appropriate information materials. CONCLUSION: The findings of this rapid review demonstrate the feasibility and perceived value of culturally sensitive psychoeducation, carer training and psychosocial interventions. However, research remains small-scale, methodologically limited, with little focus given to interventions directly supporting PLWD.

Humans↗