Experiences and perceptions of lay bystanders responding to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A qualitative systematic review.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To synthesize the experiences and perceptions of lay bystanders before, during, and after responding to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. METHODS: Seven English and Chinese databases were searched from their inception to July 31, 2026, supplemented with citation tracking. Two reviewers independently selected studies, appraised methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research, and extracted the findings and supporting illustrations. Unequivocal and credible findings were synthesized using JBI meta-aggregation, and confidence was assessed using confidence in the evidence from reviews of qualitative research. RESULTS: Eight studies involving 209 participants were included. Thirty-three findings were grouped into 12 categories and 4 were synthesized findings concerning the motivators and inhibitors of response, recognition and appraisal of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, conditions facilitating or impeding cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator use, and post-event psychological responses and adjustment. Confidence in the evidence from reviews of qualitative research was moderate for the 1st 3 synthesized findings, and low for the 4th. CONCLUSION: Bystander response is a continuum that extends from event recognition and action to post-event adjustment. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest systems should provide realistic preparations, clear on-scene support, proportionate information, and psychological support after an event.