Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42690424

Six weeks of isometric resistance training led to evidence of corticospinal but not reticulospinal adaptation in previously untrained adult males.

Simon Walker·Katherine E J Keogh·Meghan Tanel·Aidan S W Baker·Anne M E Baker·Dawson J Kidgell·Stuart N Baker
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The latest hypothesis regarding the source of enhanced neural activation from resistance training is the reticulospinal rather than the corticospinal tract, based on invasive animal and emerging human data. The present study employed a six-week isometric resistance training intervention in a randomized controlled design to address this knowledge gap. Thirty-nine healthy, untrained males (age ~23 y, sustained contraction group n = 13, explosive contraction group n = 9, control group n = 17) underwent neuromuscular and electrophysiological testing and completed all study requirements. Maximal isometric torque (MVC) and rate of torque development (RTD) were measured during a familiarization session as well as before and after the six-week period. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to assess motor-evoked potential (MEP) area and silent period duration while subjects contracted to 10% of MVC. Loud sound (120&#xa0;dB) was used to modulate MEP area and reaction time to visual stimuli during the StartReact test. Only the intervention groups demonstrated significant improvements in MVC (27%) and RTD (60%) (both P < 0.01), along with reduced MEP area (-&#xa0;21%) and silent period duration (-&#xa0;23%) (both P < 0.01). The sustained contraction group showed reduced modulation of reaction time and increased MEP suppression due to loud sound. Short-term resistance training seemed to reduce cortical inhibition and corticospinal excitability in both training groups. The study showed conflicting changes in measures purported to evaluate reticulospinal functioning. It is recommended to examine different forms of resistance training and longer training exposure in future.

Explore related subjects

HumansMaleResistance TrainingEvoked Potentials, MotorYoung AdultTranscranial Magnetic StimulationPyramidal TractsAdaptation, PhysiologicalMuscle, SkeletalAdultIsometric ContractionReaction TimeElectromyographyReticular FormationRate of force developmentStartleStrength trainingTranscranial magnetic stimulationJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled Trial

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Simon Walker, Katherine E J Keogh, Meghan Tanel, Aidan S W Baker, Anne M E Baker, Dawson J Kidgell, Stuart N Baker. 2026-09-03. Six weeks of isometric resistance training led to evidence of corticospinal but not reticulospinal adaptation in previously untrained adult males.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-026-07391-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial resourceAdaptation, Physiological subjectAdult subjectElectromyography subjectEvoked Potentials, Motor subjectHumans subjectIsometric Contraction subjectJournal Article subjectMale subjectMuscle, Skeletal subjectRandomized controlled trials study

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Comparative effects of 12-week resistance training on unstable and stable surfaces on muscle stiffness, muscle co-activation, and balance in older patients with knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: This randomized trial compared the effects of unstable resistance training (URT), involving resistance exercises on unstable surfaces, and stable resistance training (SRT), performed on stable surfaces, on muscle stiffness, co-activation, and balance in older adults with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). We hypothesized that URT would yield greater improvements by enhancing neuromuscular adaptability. METHODS: Fifty patients with KOA were randomly assigned to the URT group (n&#x202f;=&#x202f;25) or the SRT group (n&#x202f;=&#x202f;25). After attrition, 46 participants (URT: n&#x202f;=&#x202f;23; SRT: n&#x202f;=&#x202f;23) completed the intervention and were included in the final analysis. Both groups completed a 12-week supervised lower-limb resistance training program (3 sessions/week) consisting of 10 exercises performed under either unstable or stable support conditions. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of intervention, both groups showed significant reductions in pain intensity (p&#x202f;<&#x202f;0.001). However, compared with the SRT group, the URT group demonstrated significantly greater reductions in quadriceps stiffness (p&#x202f;<&#x202f;0.05), selected hamstring stiffness outcomes (p&#x202f;<&#x202f;0.05), and quadriceps-hamstring co-activation (p&#x202f;<&#x202f;0.001), alongside superior improvements in both dynamic balance and static balance (all p&#x202f;<&#x202f;0.05). CONCLUSION: While both training modalities are effective for pain relief, URT elicited greater improvements in balance-related performance and neuromuscular-mechanical outcomes than SRT in older adults with KOA. These findings suggest that incorporating unstable support conditions into resistance training may provide additional rehabilitation benefits for this population.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Effects of blood flow restriction training combined with resistance training on lower-limb strength and sport-specific performance in athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: In contemporary sports science, athletes and coaches continuously explore strategies to reduce training load and injury risk while increasing muscular strength and sport-specific performance. This meta-analysis evaluated the effects of blood flow restriction training (BFRT) combined with resistance training (RT) on lower-limb muscle strength and sport-specific performance in athletes. METHODS: Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were systematically searched across major databases (e.g. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and Embase) from inception until November 2024. Two independent reviewers carefully assessed the studies. Data analysis was carried out using RevMan 5.4 software, which included heterogeneity testing, meta-analysis, subgroup analysis, and assessment of publication bias. RESULTS: Ten RCTs (181 athletes; 91 in the BFRT and RT group, 90 in the control group) were included. Outcomes determined BFRT combined with RT yielded notable enhancements in lower-limb muscle strength (SMD = 1.09, 95% CI [0.52, 1.66], p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.05) and muscle hypertrophy (MD = 1.09, 95% CI [0.10, 2.09], p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.05) compared to control training. However, no significant improvement in sport-specific performance was found (SMD = 0.11, 95% CI [-0.18, 0.40], p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.46). Substantial heterogeneity was observed for strength outcomes (I2 = 75%), whereas low heterogeneity was observed for sport-specific performance and hypertrophy outcomes (I2 = 0%). No evidence of significant publication bias was detected. CONCLUSION: BFRT combined with RT appears to provide effective augmentation of lower-limb muscle strength and hypertrophy in athletes compared to RT or conventional training alone. It may be prudent to integrate this approach systematically into training cycles to optimize physiological muscle stimulation and training outcomes, despite not directly improving sport-specific performance.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Effects of Moderate-Frequency Resistance Training on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Adults With Overweight or Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Resistance training (RT) effectively manages cardiometabolic risk factors in adults, but the specific effects of moderate-frequency RT (2-3 sessions/week) in adults with overweight or obesity are understudied. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate moderate-frequency RT's effects on cardiometabolic risk factors in this population and quantify effect sizes. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library searched up to July 2025. ELIGIBILITY: English randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing RT (&#x2265;&#x2009;7&#x2009;weeks) to nonexercise control; nonathletic adults &#x2265;&#x2009;18&#x2009;years with BMI&#x2009;&#x2265;&#x2009;25&#x2009;kg/m2. PARTICIPANTS: 454 participants across 12 RCTs (mean age 58.93&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;12.87&#x2009;years; mean BMI 31.2&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;3.5&#x2009;kg/m2; ~50% female). RESULTS: RT significantly reduced diastolic blood pressure (MD&#x2009;=&#x2009;-1.53&#x2009;mmHg; 95% CI: -2.16 to -0.91; p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.01), LDL-C (MD&#x2009;=&#x2009;-0.25&#x2009;mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.41 to -0.08; p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.01), and triglycerides (MD&#x2009;=&#x2009;-0.17&#x2009;mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.30 to -0.04; p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.01). No significant effects on systolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, waist circumference, glycemic markers, total cholesterol, or HDL-C. Subgroup analyses showed larger LDL-C/triglyceride improvements with concurrent dietary control. CONCLUSION: Moderate-frequency RT inconsistently improves cardiometabolic risk factors, benefiting diastolic blood pressure, LDL-C, and triglycerides but not glycemic or other parameters. Combining with dietary control may enhance benefits, supporting RT as a complementary strategy in multimodal lifestyle interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO: CRD42022343167.

Humans↗