Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and gastrointestinal neoplasm risk in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Yu-Fan Zhang; Jia-Jie Xie; Qi Wu; Xiao-Yu Zhou; Chen Zeng; Yan Zeng; Yi-Meng He; Man Guo; Fang-Yuan Teng; Yong Xu

doi:10.1007/s10238-026-02300-6

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42690254

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and gastrointestinal neoplasm risk in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Yu-Fan Zhang·Jia-Jie Xie·Qi Wu·Xiao-Yu Zhou·Chen Zeng·Yan Zeng·Yi-Meng He·Man Guo·Fang-Yuan Teng·Yong Xu

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The potential carcinogenic effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remain controversial, particularly regarding site-specific gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasms. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the relationship between SGLT2 inhibitors and the risk of GI neoplasms in patients with T2DM. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science through March 17, 2025, for RCTs in T2DM comparing SGLT2 inhibitors with placebo or active comparators. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. The primary outcome was GI neoplasms reported in publications, supplementary materials, or trial registries, usually as adverse events rather than centrally adjudicated cancer endpoints. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in Stata 17.0. In 48 RCTs (n = 48,765), SGLT2 inhibitor therapy was not associated with overall GI neoplasm risk (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.84-1.44; p = 0.46; I² = 0%). Site-specific analyses showed no statistically significant association for esophageal (OR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.37-3.45), gastric (1.20, 0.65-2.23), hepatic (0.62, 0.31-1.22), pancreatic (0.91, 0.51-1.64), colonic (1.28, 0.78-2.08), colorectal (0.76, 0.27-2.17), and rectal neoplasms (0.98, 0.49-1.97), with all p-values > 0.05. Subgroup analyses by agents (e.g., canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin), baseline age, body mass index (BMI), HbA1c, treatment duration, and dose were also non-significant (all p > 0.05). Approximately half of the trials had follow-up of one year or less, limiting our ability to evaluate long-term risk. Available RCT evidence does not show a clear increase in GI neoplasm risk with SGLT2 inhibitors in T2DM. However, limited follow-up, low event counts, and non-cancer-specific outcome ascertainment, the findings should be interpreted as reassuring but not definitive evidence of long-term oncologic safety.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO No. CRD42024619019.

Explore related subjects

Humans Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Gastrointestinal Neoplasms Hypoglycemic Agents Canagliflozin Benzhydryl Compounds Glucosides Dapagliflozin Empagliflozin Gastrointestinal neoplasms Meta-analysis SGLT2 inhibitors Type 2 diabetes Systematic Review Journal Article Meta-Analysis Review

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Yu-Fan Zhang, Jia-Jie Xie, Qi Wu, Xiao-Yu Zhou, Chen Zeng, Yan Zeng, Yi-Meng He, Man Guo, Fang-Yuan Teng, Yong Xu. 2026-09-03. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and gastrointestinal neoplasm risk in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-026-02300-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Benzhydryl Compounds subject Dapagliflozin subject Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 subject Glucosides subject Humans subject Journal Article subject Meta-Analysis subject Systematic Review; Journal Article; Meta-Analysis; Review resource Systematic reviews study

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Association between SGLT2 inhibitors and reporting of phimosis/paraphimosis: a comparative pharmacovigilance analysis of the WHO database.

PURPOSE: Recent data have discussed occurrence of phimosis with Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. However, the potential risk among the different SGLT2 inhibitors is unknown. METHODS: Using Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) registered in the WHO pharmacovigilance database (01/01/2000-30/06/2025), comparisons between the different SGLT2 inhibitors and versus other drugs used in diabetes (DUD) were performed. Results are shown as Reporting Odds Ratios (ROR). RESULTS: Among 11 342 810 ICSRs, 227 were phimosis/paraphimosis with SGLT2 inhibitors, mainly between 45 and 64 years. The higher ROR value was found with empagliflozin followed by dapagliflozin and canagliflozin. ROR for SGLT2 inhibitors was higher that of all other DUD [34.72 (25.86-46.62)]. The reporting risk of phimosis/paraphimosis with SGLT2 inhibitors was also higher than that of each pharmacological class of DUD. CONCLUSION: The results suggest an association between SGLT2 inhibitors use and phimosis ICSRs. Empagliflozin had the higher reporting risk.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Effect of SGLT2 inhibitor drugs on triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Insulin resistance is a serious public health concern. The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index is a simple, cheap, and reproducible surrogate of insulin resistance, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have reshaped cardio-metabolic care beyond glycemic control. METHODS: We followed PRISMA and registered the protocol in PROSPERO (CRD420251056341). We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane from inception to May 31st, 2026, including observational studies and clinical trials reporting baseline and follow-up TyG in adults. Two reviewers screened records, a third resolved disagreements, data were extracted with a standardized form, and quality was assessed with Cochrane RoB 2.0, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the JBI checklists. The primary outcome was within-group change in TyG pooled with random-effects (Hartung-Knapp); tests were two-sided with a significance threshold of 0.05. RESULTS: Twelve studies comprising thirteen study arms were included, with a total of 1845 participants. Follow-up ranged from 12 weeks to 5 years. Across studies, SGLT2 inhibitor therapy was associated with a significant reduction in TyG index (mean difference = -0.28, 95% confidence interval [-0.41; -0.14], I2 = 99.5%). Egger's test suggested possible small-study effects, whereas Begg's test and trim-and-fill analysis did not show clear evidence of publication bias; leave-one-out analyses showed that no single study materially influenced the pooled estimate. CONCLUSION: Despite heterogeneity in populations, drug choice, and follow-up duration, SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a significant decrease in TyG, although small-study effects cannot be excluded.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors after acute myocardial infarction: Are the benefits limited to patients with diabetes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction remains one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Recently, studies have focused on evaluating the effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors in this scenario. Objectives We aimed to perform a meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors vs standard care. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing patients with acute myocardial infarction using iSGLT2 inhibitors and standard care. Statistical analyses were conducted using R software (v 4.3.2) and a random-effects model was employed for all outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 31,378 patients were included, with 10,897 (34.7%) assigned to the SGLT2 inhibitor group. Among these studies, three were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). There was a significant difference in reduction of HF readmissions (OR 0.61; p < 0.01), all-cause mortality (OR 0.62; p < 0.01;) and stroke (OR 0.67; p < 0.01;). However, there was no significant difference in cardiovascular death, rehospitalization for any cause and recurrence of acute MI. Meta regression and subgroup analysis showed a trend toward better outcomes in the diabetic and non-STEMI population. CONCLUSIONS: SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with lower HF rehospitalization, stroke, and all-cause mortality after acute MI, mainly in observational studies. Benefits appeared greater in diabetic and non-STEMI patients. Dedicated RCTs focusing on diabetic, particularly non-STEMI, populations are needed to confirm these findings. KEY POINTS: What is already known on this topic: SGLT2 inhibitors have demonstrated cardiovascular and renal benefits in patients with heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, their role in the acute myocardial infarction (AMI) setting remains uncertain, particularly regarding post-AMI outcomes such as heart failure readmissions, mortality, and recurrent ischemic events, with current evidence derived from heterogeneous and predominantly observational studies. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: This meta-analysis, including over 31,000 patients, suggests that SGLT2 inhibitors are associated with reductions in heart failure readmissions, all-cause mortality, and stroke following AMI. These associations were more consistently observed in patients with type 2 diabetes and in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) populations. However, randomized controlled trials showed neutral results, and the observed benefits were mainly driven by observational studies. Meaning: These findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. While SGLT2 inhibitors may represent a potential therapeutic strategy in selected post-AMI populations, particularly patients with diabetes and NSTEMI, current evidence does not support routine early in-hospital initiation. Dedicated randomized trials specifically enrolling diabetic post-AMI patients are required to clarify optimal timing and clinical benefit.

Humans↗