Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42440094

Association between SGLT2 inhibitors and reporting of phimosis/paraphimosis: a comparative pharmacovigilance analysis of the WHO database.

Jean-Louis Montastruc
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent data have discussed occurrence of phimosis with Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. However, the potential risk among the different SGLT2 inhibitors is unknown. METHODS: Using Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) registered in the WHO pharmacovigilance database (01/01/2000-30/06/2025), comparisons between the different SGLT2 inhibitors and versus other drugs used in diabetes (DUD) were performed. Results are shown as Reporting Odds Ratios (ROR). RESULTS: Among 11 342 810 ICSRs, 227 were phimosis/paraphimosis with SGLT2 inhibitors, mainly between 45 and 64 years. The higher ROR value was found with empagliflozin followed by dapagliflozin and canagliflozin. ROR for SGLT2 inhibitors was higher that of all other DUD [34.72 (25.86-46.62)]. The reporting risk of phimosis/paraphimosis with SGLT2 inhibitors was also higher than that of each pharmacological class of DUD. CONCLUSION: The results suggest an association between SGLT2 inhibitors use and phimosis ICSRs. Empagliflozin had the higher reporting risk.

Explore related subjects

HumansPharmacovigilanceSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsGlucosidesPhimosisDatabases, FactualMiddle AgedHypoglycemic AgentsCanagliflozinBenzhydryl CompoundsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleDiabetesGliflozinsParaphimosisSGLT2 inhibitorsJournal ArticleComparative Study

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jean-Louis Montastruc. 2026-07-13. Association between SGLT2 inhibitors and reporting of phimosis/paraphimosis: a comparative pharmacovigilance analysis of the WHO database.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-026-02742-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Journal Article; Comparative Study resourceBenzhydryl Compounds subjectComparative Study subjectDatabases, Factual subjectDiabetes subjectDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 subjectFemale subjectGlucosides subjectHumans subjectJournal Article subjectMiddle Aged subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Effect of SGLT2 inhibitor drugs on triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Insulin resistance is a serious public health concern. The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index is a simple, cheap, and reproducible surrogate of insulin resistance, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have reshaped cardio-metabolic care beyond glycemic control. METHODS: We followed PRISMA and registered the protocol in PROSPERO (CRD420251056341). We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane from inception to May 31st, 2026, including observational studies and clinical trials reporting baseline and follow-up TyG in adults. Two reviewers screened records, a third resolved disagreements, data were extracted with a standardized form, and quality was assessed with Cochrane RoB 2.0, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the JBI checklists. The primary outcome was within-group change in TyG pooled with random-effects (Hartung-Knapp); tests were two-sided with a significance threshold of 0.05. RESULTS: Twelve studies comprising thirteen study arms were included, with a total of 1845 participants. Follow-up ranged from 12 weeks to 5 years. Across studies, SGLT2 inhibitor therapy was associated with a significant reduction in TyG index (mean difference = -0.28, 95% confidence interval [-0.41; -0.14], I2 = 99.5%). Egger's test suggested possible small-study effects, whereas Begg's test and trim-and-fill analysis did not show clear evidence of publication bias; leave-one-out analyses showed that no single study materially influenced the pooled estimate. CONCLUSION: Despite heterogeneity in populations, drug choice, and follow-up duration, SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a significant decrease in TyG, although small-study effects cannot be excluded.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Sodium Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors and Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies.

BACKGROUND: Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) may exert antiarrhythmic effects, but their association with ventricular arrhythmias remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the association between SGLT2i use and the risk of ventricular arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, and sudden cardiac death compared with other antidiabetic medications or no SGLT2i use among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched for observational studies published between March 2013 and March 2026. Quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool, alongside evaluation of pharmacoepidemiology-specific biases. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies (16 cohort and one nested case-control) were included. Based on ROBINS-I, seven studies had moderate, eight serious, and two critical risks of bias. Eleven studies had at least one pharmacoepidemiology-specific bias. For ventricular arrhythmias, estimates ranged from a protective effect (hazard ratio [HR] 0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.97) to a potential increased risk (odds ratio 1.87, 95% CI 0.89-3.95) with SGLT2i use. For cardiac arrest, estimates consistently reported a lower risk with estimates that ranged from HR 0.63 (95% CI 0.59-0.68) to HR 0.85 (95% CI 0.82-0.88). The only study on sudden cardiac death reported a potential risk reduction (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.38-1.01). CONCLUSIONS: While the association between SGLT2i and ventricular arrhythmias remains inconsistent, the use of SGLT2i likely reduces cardiac arrest and may reduce sudden cardiac death, suggesting a possible protective effect on ventricular arrhythmias among patients with type 2 diabetes.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2026

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and gastrointestinal neoplasm risk in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The potential carcinogenic effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remain controversial, particularly regarding site-specific gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasms. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the relationship between SGLT2 inhibitors and the risk of GI neoplasms in patients with T2DM. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science through March 17, 2025, for RCTs in T2DM comparing SGLT2 inhibitors with placebo or active comparators. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. The primary outcome was GI neoplasms reported in publications, supplementary materials, or trial registries, usually as adverse events rather than centrally adjudicated cancer endpoints. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in Stata 17.0. In 48 RCTs (n = 48,765), SGLT2 inhibitor therapy was not associated with overall GI neoplasm risk (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.84-1.44; p = 0.46; I² = 0%). Site-specific analyses showed no statistically significant association for esophageal (OR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.37-3.45), gastric (1.20, 0.65-2.23), hepatic (0.62, 0.31-1.22), pancreatic (0.91, 0.51-1.64), colonic (1.28, 0.78-2.08), colorectal (0.76, 0.27-2.17), and rectal neoplasms (0.98, 0.49-1.97), with all p-values > 0.05. Subgroup analyses by agents (e.g., canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin), baseline age, body mass index (BMI), HbA1c, treatment duration, and dose were also non-significant (all p > 0.05). Approximately half of the trials had follow-up of one year or less, limiting our ability to evaluate long-term risk. Available RCT evidence does not show a clear increase in GI neoplasm risk with SGLT2 inhibitors in T2DM. However, limited follow-up, low event counts, and non-cancer-specific outcome ascertainment, the findings should be interpreted as reassuring but not definitive evidence of long-term oncologic safety.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO No. CRD42024619019.

Humans↗