Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42678544

Novel non-contrast computed tomography parameters for predicting spontaneous stone passage and surgical requirement in ureteral stones: The role of ureteral wall thickness and dilatation ratio.

Abstract

We investigated the predictive value of standard non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) measurements, the ureteral dilatation ratio (DDR) and intraluminal urine stasis markers, for spontaneous stone passage (SSP) versus surgical intervention in patients with ureteral stones. We also evaluated ureteral wall thickness (UWT) as a practical clinical marker. This retrospective study included 461 patients diagnosed with ureteral stones via NCCT. Patients were categorised into two groups based on clinical outcomes: the spontaneous passage group (MET; n&#x2009;=&#x2009;229) and the endoscopic surgery group (URS; n&#x2009;=&#x2009;232). Stone volume, stone density (HU), UWT, DDR and intraluminal urine attenuation values were measured for all patients. Independent risk factors were identified using a multivariate logistic regression model and clinical cut-off values were determined via ROC curve analysis. Stone volume, density, UWT and hydronephrosis grade were all significantly higher in the URS group. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that increased UWT (OR: 5.03, 95% CI: 3.66-6.90; p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001) was the strongest independent predictor of surgery. Higher DDR (OR: 1.88; p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.003), advanced hydronephrosis, stone volume, and density also increased surgical risk. A UWT cut-off &#x2265;&#x2009;2.97&#xa0;mm predicted surgery with 84.8% sensitivity and 84.3% specificity (AUC: 0.872). A DDR cut-off >&#x2009;1.79 yielded 81.7% specificity and 40.4% sensitivity. UWT weakly correlated with stone volume (r&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.145), indicating wall thickening reflects an inflammatory response rather than a mere mechanical consequence. UWT is a superior predictor of SSP failure, supported by increased DDR as a highly specific complementary risk factor. These parameters could help clinicians to identify patients who would benefit from early surgical counselling and intervention rather than prolonged conservative management.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yasin Akta&#x15f;, Arda Tongal, Ali Nihat G&#xf6;kcan, O&#x11f;uzhan Ertan, Adem Tun&#xe7;ekin, Hakan T&#xfc;rk. 2026-09-01. Novel non-contrast computed tomography parameters for predicting spontaneous stone passage and surgical requirement in ureteral stones: The role of ureteral wall thickness and dilatation ratio.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-026-02033-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Flexible ureteroscopy with a flexible and negative suction ureteral access sheath versus traditional sheath for treatment of infectious upper urinary tract stones: A prospective, randomized controlled study.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) with a flexible and negative suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) versus traditional sheath for patients with infectious upper urinary tract stones (IUUTS). A total of 185 patients were enrolled, with 93 assigned to the FANS group and 92 to the traditional UAS group. The primary outcome was the stone-free rate (SFR) at the first postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included the SFR at 30 days postoperatively, operative time, hemoglobin reduction, length of hospital stay, quality of life (QoL) improvement, incidence of ureteral stricture at 3 months, and surgery-related complications. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in baseline demographics or preoperative clinical characteristics (P&#x2009;>&#x2009;0.05). The FANS group had significantly lower white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin levels at 6 and 24&#xa0;h postoperatively (all P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.05). Mean operative time was significantly shorter (P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), QoL improvement was obviously greater (P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), and average hospital stay was shorter in the FANS group (P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001). The SFRs on postoperative day 1 and at 30 days were both significantly higher in the FANS group (both P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.05). At 3 months, ureteral strictures occurred in three patients in the traditional UAS group and one in the FANS group, a difference that was not statistically significant (P&#x2009;>&#x2009;0.05). The overall complication rate was significantly lower in the FANS group (P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.05). For patients with IUUTS, fURS combined with FANS effectively improves stone clearance efficiency and reduces the risk of postoperative infection.

Humans

F-URS with FANS versus mPCNL for 2-3&#x2009;cm UUTS: a RCT with a subgroup analysis of 2-2.5&#x2009;cm stones.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS) with a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) compared with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) in the treatment of 2-3&#x2009;cm upper urinary tract stones (UUTS), with a prespecified subgroup analysis for stones &#x2265;2 to <2.5&#x2009;cm. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial enrolled 326 patients with 2-3&#x2009;cm UUTS between June 2023 and December 2025. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either f-URS with FANS or mPCNL. A prespecified subgroup analysis was conducted for stones measuring &#x2265;2 to <2.5&#x2009;cm. The primary outcomes were the immediate and 1-month stone-free rate (SFR). Secondary outcomes included the operative duration, decrease in haemoglobin, hospital stay, and complication rate. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. In the overall 2-3&#x2009;cm cohort, the FANS group achieved immediate and 1-month SFRs comparable to those of the mPCNL group. Although the operative time was longer in the FANS group, it was associated with significantly less haemoglobin loss and a shorter hospital stay, with no significant difference in infection-related complications. Notably, in the subgroup of stones &#x2265;2 to <2.5&#x2009;cm, the FANS group demonstrated a non-inferior SFR at both time points, and the operative time was not significantly longer than that of the mPCNL group. CONCLUSION: For 2-3&#x2009;cm UUTS, f-URS with FANS offers a SFR comparable to that of mPCNL, along with the advantages of reduced blood loss and shorter hospitalization. In the &#x2265;2 to <2.5&#x2009;cm subgroup, FANS shows comprehensive benefits over mPCNL. These findings support FANS as an effective alternative to mPCNL for 2-3&#x2009;cm stones and a potentially preferred option for stones measuring 2-2.5&#x2009;cm.

Humans

Feasibility of implementation, diagnostic accuracy, and end-user impact of an electronic health record (EHR)-based ureteral stent tracking tool in a pediatric population.

INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVES: Ureteral stent tracking systems have reduced stent retention in adults, but their accuracy and impact in pediatrics have been minimally explored. With low event rates in children, such tools may yield high false positives, raising questions on balancing event prevention with provider burden. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, diagnostic accuracy, and end-user impact of an Electronic Surveillance Tool for Evaluating Nephroureteral stent Tracking (eSTENT) at our institution. STUDY DESIGN: eSTENT, implemented in 1/2024, flags ureteral stents at risk for retention based on implant documentation, expected explant date, and explant documentation. Monthly reports are generated for stents missing explant documentation. We retrospectively evaluated the diagnostic performance of eSTENT from 1/2024-8/2025 at our pediatric hospital. A usability survey including a validated 1-7 implementation score (higher = easier implementation) was distributed to pediatric urologists and operating room nurses. RESULTS: Of 172 cases with ureteral stent placement, eSTENT flagged 28 events (16%) in 24 patients. Of these, 26 represented documentation gaps where explant had been appropriate. Two flags had no documentation of explant, representing near miss events that were identified. No retained stents occurred, consistent with high sensitivity and modest specificity. There were no flags in the last 6 months of the study period. Survey response rate was 100% for surgeons and 55% for nurses. Before eSTENT, stents were not routinely tracked. All surgeons and 93% of nurses reported no added burden, despite occasional misidentification of retained stents. Three surgeons found eSTENT beneficial, four were neutral, and free-text responses generally cited eSTENT's "fail safe" nature as positive. Nurses suggested improvements, including user support and integrated documentation reminders. The average implementation score among both groups was 6/7, indicating easy adoption. DISCUSSION: While the impact of stent tracking tools in adult literature has been positive, our study emphasizes the feasibility of broader adoption at a pediatric hospital. Integration of eSTENT may avoid the potentially devastating consequences of a retained stent. Prioritizing sensitivity over specificity appears acceptable for a "never event" in patient safety. Our study is limited by the retrospective nature of data collection and survey bias. CONCLUSIONS: Though no stents were retained in the study period, eSTENT appropriately flagged two cases without added burden to most end-users. Further optimization is warranted, but adoption in pediatric centers may enhance care reliability.

Humans