Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42677886

Reproductive Intentions and Fertility Preservation Among Transgender and Nonbinary Individuals: A Cross-Sectional Study in Brazil.

Letícia A Mendonça·Isabela G Silva·Iris T T Umeda·Phelipe E Silva·Heitor Bernardes P Delfino·Camila Toffoli-Ribeiro
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated reproductive intentions, fertility-related knowledge, prior fertility counseling, and factors associated with reproductive intentions among transgender and nonbinary individuals receiving care at a Brazilian public reference center. METHODS: This cross-sectional study with a qualitative component was conducted between July and November 2025 in a specialized gender-affirming care clinic in Brazil. Quantitative data included sociodemographic characteristics, reproductive history, gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT), and fertility-related variables. Logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with desire for future parenthood. Responses to a single open-ended question regarding perceived effects of GAHT on fertility were analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-two participants were included (mean age 27.5 ± 7.4 years). Most identified as transgender men (65.9%), followed by transgender women (26.8%) and nonbinary individuals (7.3%); 79.3% were receiving GAHT. Although 63.4% expressed a desire for future parenthood, only 7.3% had children. Current interest in fertility preservation was reported by 20.8% (15/72). Having children (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.001-0.62; p = 0.023) and each additional year of GAHT duration (aOR = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.70-0.99; p = 0.038) were associated with lower odds of desiring future parenthood. Sex assigned at birth was not independently associated with reproductive intentions. Qualitative analysis revealed misconceptions, uncertainty, and conditional beliefs regarding fertility. CONCLUSIONS: Desire for future parenthood was common among transgender and nonbinary individuals, whereas engagement with fertility preservation remained limited. These findings highlight the need for longitudinal, patient-centered reproductive counseling integrated into gender-affirming care.

Explore related subjects

fertility preservationgender-affirming hormone therapyhealth services for transgender personsreproductive healthtransgender personsJournal Article

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Letícia A Mendonça, Isabela G Silva, Iris T T Umeda, Phelipe E Silva, Heitor Bernardes P Delfino, Camila Toffoli-Ribeiro. 2026-09-01. Reproductive Intentions and Fertility Preservation Among Transgender and Nonbinary Individuals: A Cross-Sectional Study in Brazil.. https://doi.org/10.1177/23258292261480721

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Journal Article resourceJournal Article subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Discrimination, chronic stress, and multimorbidity in cohort of Black and Latina transgender women with HIV: Longitudinal findings from the LITE Plus study.

Black and Latina transgender women with HIV (BLTWH) are exposed to repeated, intersecting discrimination based on race, gender, and serostatus. Minority stress theory conceptualizes discrimination as minority-specific stressors that drive health inequities. Allostatic load theory posits a pathway between discrimination and chronic disease through multisystem physiological dysregulation caused by chronic stress. To test this pathway, a longitudinal cohort of 108 BLTWH, enrolled December 2020 - June 2022 in Boston, New York City, and Washington, DC, were followed for 24 months, with biomarkers measured at baseline, 12, and 24 months. Questionnaires administered every 6 months assessed anticipated discrimination, everyday discrimination, perceived stress, and other psychosocial factors. Multimorbidity was measured via self-reported non-HIV chronic conditions. In mixed-effects mediation models, allostatic load did not mediate relationships between multimorbidity outcomes and anticipated discrimination (β: -0.0004 [95% CI: -0.004, 0.003]) nor everyday discrimination (β: -0.002 [95%CI: -0.009, 0.003]). Perceived stress demonstrated indirect effects on multimorbidity in unadjusted models of anticipated discrimination (β: 0.024, [95% CI: 0.015, 0.081]) and everyday discrimination (β: 0.021 [95%CI: 0.016, 0.077]). Indirect effects remained significant, with attenuated effects (β: 0.020 for anticipated discrimination; β: 0.017 for everyday discrimination) after adjusting for social support, community connection, and resilient coping. Total effects were only significant for the adjusted model of everyday discrimination (β: 0.056 [0.014, 0.099]). Findings suggest discrimination impacted health through specific psychosocial pathways. Alongside efforts to eliminate intersectional discrimination, stress-lowering interventions and increased access to social support and community connection may be effective approaches to reducing multimorbidity in this highly marginalized group.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Solutions for engaging priority populations in HIV cure research: a hybrid Delphi consensus-building process.

BACKGROUND: To achieve consensus on barriers and strategies to improve the engagement of three priority populations - Black and Latino/a/x individuals, cisgender women, and transgender women in HIV cure research. METHODS: We assembled a panel of 54 experts assigned to six groups in a hybrid Delphi process: (1) HIV community members, (2) biomedical researchers, (3) medical providers, (4) funders and private industry members, (5) bioethicists and regulators, and (6) social scientists. Over 18 months, we conducted four iterative survey rounds and three group discussions to identify barriers and strategies to arrive at a consensus on how to engage these priority populations in HIV cure research. RESULTS: For Black and Latino/a/x populations, the panellists identified inadequate outreach and a lack of accessible educational information as primary barriers and emphasised community-driven engagement and partnerships with trusted leaders as key strategies. For cisgender women, logistical hurdles, caregiving responsibilities and time constraints were identified as major barriers, with flexible trial designs and equitable compensation proposed as solutions. For transgender women, the lack of transgender-focused research design, including misrepresentation and exclusion, was identified as a key barrier, while centring transgender-specific needs in study design achieved consensus as the most effective strategy. CONCLUSION: Among all four priority populations, investment in outreach, engagement along the research process, better integration of health needs with research, and enhanced incentives are not novel ideas, but remain obviously ignored in a way that has led to underrepresentation of people in HIV cure research, who carry the greatest burden of HIV in the U.S. SUMMARY: This paper uses a hybrid Delphi process to identify and reach consensus on key barriers and strategies to engage underrepresented groups: Black and Latino/a/x individuals, cisgender women, and transgender women in HIV cure research across the United States.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Beyond survival: Testicular tissue cryopreservation for fertility preservation during childhood cancer, experiences from a single center.

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 30% of all male childhood cancer survivors receive gonadotoxic therapy increasing their risk for infertility. The only current option for potential fertility preservation in prepubertal males is through testicular tissue cryopreservation (TTC), available through clinical trials. Our aim was to evaluate our experience and identify barriers to enrollment in the TTC study. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted to describe a single center experience with TTC, including an assessment of factors impacting the decision to enroll or not enroll in the TTC trial. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients were found to be eligible for enrollment in the TTC trial, with 23 patients (34%) choosing to enroll and undergo testicular tissue cryopreservation including 19 (83%) oncology patients. In patients who underwent TTC there were no unexpected delays in starting disease directed therapy. For families that declined enrollment, many did not see fertility preservation as a priority at the time of counseling. (n = 17, 44%). Other barriers included concerns about post-operative complications and a feeling of being overwhelmed at the time of counseling. DISCUSSION: Despite being the only preservation option for pre-pubertal boys facing risk of infertility, TTC enrollment was not pursued by a majority of eligible patients and families. Identifying potential barriers or misconceptions, particularly in regard to post operative complication risks, offer opportunities for improved counseling and education. Early introduction of the Fertility Navigation team allows for procedural coordination success and access for patients that are interested. Success is not measured in how many patients proceed with TTC, rather that all patients have the opportunity for counseling and discussion. CONCLUSION: TTC can be offered and completed safely without delays in disease-directed treatment timelines. A Fertility Navigation Program allows for equal opportunity for education and enrollment on TTC protocol which should be the goal for pediatric institutions, though is not pursued by many patients. A majority of those who declined the study did not see fertility as a priority at the time of treatment while others were concerned regarding peri-operative risks.

Humans↗