Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42640170

Induction Paclitaxel-Cisplatin-Capecitabine for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We previously reported higher failure-free survival (FFS) with induction paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine (TPC) compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil (PF) in high-risk locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC). We now report 5-year FFS, with prespecified secondary outcomes. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized trial, patients with high-risk LA-NPC (T4N0-2M0 or TanyN3M0) received two 21-day cycles of induction chemotherapy with TPC or PF, followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The primary endpoint was FFS; secondary endpoints included distant metastasis-free, locoregional relapse-free, and overall survival (OS), tumor response, and safety. RESULTS: Among 238 patients (TPC, n=118; PF, n=120), with median follow-up of 89.1 months, 5-year FFS was 77.6% in the TPC group and 62.9% in the PF group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34-0.82). At 5 years, distant metastasis-free survival was 87.8% in the TPC group and 78.8% in the PF group (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.28-0.95); locoregional relapse-free survival was 92.0% and 82.1%, respectively (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.21-0.88); and OS was 89.6% and 82.2%, respectively (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.27-0.95). Among patients with pretreatment Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA <3000 copies/ml, 5-year OS was 92.3% in the TPC group and 84.4% in the PF group. Among those with higher EBV DNA levels, rates were 84.2% in TPC group and 81.1% in PF group. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 68 patients (57.6%) receiving TPC and 79 patients (65.8%) receiving PF. Treatment adherence was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with high-risk LA-NPC, TPC induction chemotherapy was associated with higher 5-year FFS than PF. (Funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China and State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02940925.).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Wang-Zhong Li, Shu-Hui Lv, Shui-Qing He, Xing Lv, Lin Wang, Ya-Hui Yu, Wei-Xiong Xia, Yan-Fang Ye, Dan Hu, Wei-Xin Bei, Nian Lu, Meng-Yun Shi, Liang-Ru Ke, Hu Liang, Chuan-Run Zhang, Ze-Yu Zhao, Han-Xiong Zhang, Li-Hua Tong, Wen Yang, Wu-Bing Tang, Tai-Ze Yuan, Xiang Guo, Chang-Qing Xie, Guo-Ying Liu, Yan-Qun Xiang. 2026-08-25. Induction Paclitaxel-Cisplatin-Capecitabine for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.. https://doi.org/10.1056/evidoa2500278

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Daily low-dose carboplatin or weekly carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel for concurrent chemoradiotherapy in older patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (JCOG1914): A randomized phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Daily low-dose carboplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy is the standard treatment for older patients with unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) in Japan. METHODS: This open-label phase 3 trial was conducted at 38 institutions in Japan. Patients aged&#xa0;&#x2265;&#xa0;75&#xa0;years with LA-NSCLC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive daily carboplatin (30&#xa0;mg/m2) or weekly carboplatin (area under the curve, 2&#xa0;mg&#xb7;min/mL) plus nab-paclitaxel (30&#xa0;mg/m2) with thoracic radiotherapy. Durvalumab maintenance therapy was recommended after treatment completion. The primary endpoint was overall survival, which was used to assess the non-inferiority of weekly carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel compared to daily low-dose carboplatin. RESULTS: From December 2020 to March 2024, 124 patients were enrolled (carboplatin arm, 61 and carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel arm, 63). In the planned interim analysis, the Bayesian predictive probability indicating the non-inferiority of carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel compared with carboplatin in the final analysis was 8.0%, leading to early study termination for futility. The median overall survival was not estimable in the carboplatin arm; the estimated value in the carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel arm was 26.1&#xa0;months (hazard ratio, 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-3.11; p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.200). Two treatment-related and seven non-cancer-related deaths occurred in the carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel arm. Patients in the carboplatin arm had better quality of life than those in the carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel arm at 6&#xa0;weeks (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.81; p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Daily low-dose carboplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy remains the standard treatment for older patients with unresectable LA-NSCLC in Japan.

Humans

Molecular targeted therapy in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancer (PROC): a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although single-agent chemotherapy is the most common approach for treating platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian cancer (PROC), there is growing evidence that combining molecular targeted agents with chemotherapy is beneficial, especially for certain patient groups. However, the most effective combination regimen remains elusive. OBJECTIVES: This Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to identify the best combination therapy for PROC. METHODS: Relevant studies were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from their inception until October 2024. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs). Statistical analyses were performed using the GEMTC package (1.0-2) and R 4.2.0. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023428414). RESULTS: Our analysis of 22 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n&#xa0;=&#xa0;3408) demonstrated that chemotherapy combinations with bevacizumab (hazard ratio (HR)&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.52-0.65), sorafenib (HR = 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45-0.93) or adavosertib (HR = 0.56, 95%CI: 0.35-0.90) significantly improved OS and PFS versus chemotherapy alone. Notably, adavosertib&#xa0;+&#xa0;gemcitabine was associated with an increased risk of grade 3-4 AEs (relative risk (RR)&#xa0;=&#xa0;1.8, 95%CI: 1.3-2.7), but these were generally manageable. CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab-based combinations demonstrate consistent benefits across multiple regimens for PROC. Paclitaxel&#xa0;+&#xa0;bevacizumab emerges as the optimal balance of efficacy and safety. Topotecan&#xa0;+&#xa0;sorafenib could be an alternative for patients who are ineligible for anti-angiogenic therapy.

Humans

Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of fruquintinib versus ramucirumab in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Aim: Fruquintinib (Fruq), a selective VEGFR 1/2/3 inhibitor, showed a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in the Phase III FRUTIGA trial for advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Ramucirumab (RAM), an anti-VEGFR2 antibody, demonstrated efficacy in the RAINBOW-Asia trial. This anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) evaluated Fruq plus paclitaxel versus RAM plus paclitaxel as second-line therapy for G/GEJ adenocarcinoma in the absence of head-to-head trials. Materials & methods: Data from individual patients in the FRUTIGA study (N&#xa0;=&#xa0;703) and aggregated data from the RAINBOW-Asia study (N&#xa0;=&#xa0;440) were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were balanced using entropy balancing. The placebo plus paclitaxel (PBO&#xa0;+&#xa0;PTX) groups served as the common comparators. The primary outcome was PFS; secondary outcomes included overall survival, objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were also compared as an exploratory outcome using an adjusted indirect risk difference. Sensitivity analyses included restricted mean survival time and simulated treatment comparison. Results: After weighting (effective sample size&#xa0;=&#xa0;564), baseline covariates were balanced. The anchored MAIC demonstrated that Fruq&#xa0;+&#xa0;PTX significantly improved PFS compared with RAM&#xa0;+&#xa0;PTX (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.51-0.96; p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0280), corresponding to a 30% reduction in progression risk, with a significant restricted mean survival time benefit of 1.18&#xa0;months at 20&#xa0;months (95% CI: 0.08-2.27; p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.024). Fruq achieved significantly higher ORR (OR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.16-2.68; p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.008) and DCR (OR: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.33-2.83; p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.001). Overall survival was similar (0.97; 95% CI: 0.73-1.30; p = 0.8640). Subgroup analyses showed PFS benefits with Fruq in patients with ECOG PS 1, peritoneal metastases and two or fewer metastatic sites. In sensitivity analysis, the simulated treatment comparison also suggested a PFS benefit for Fruq&#xa0;+&#xa0;PTX (HR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.32-0.50; p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.0001). For any-grade TEAEs, the indirect comparison showed higher adjusted relative incidences of increased bilirubin with Fruq&#xa0;+&#xa0;PTX than with RAM&#xa0;+&#xa0;PTX (RD: 12.3%; 95% CI: 2.3-22.4%, p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.05) and of hypokalemia (RD: 9.0%; 95% CI: 1.5-16.4%, p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.05). For grade &#x2265;3 TEAEs, the adjusted relative incidence of decreased body weight was higher with Fruq&#xa0;+&#xa0;PTX than with RAM&#xa0;+&#xa0;PTX (RD: 2.9%; 95% CI: 0.6-5.2%, p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.05). The adjusted relative incidences of increased AST, ALT and hypocalcemia were numerically lower in the fruquintinib group than in the RAM group. Conclusion: This MAIC indicates that Fruq&#xa0;+&#xa0;PTX may be more effective than RAM&#xa0;+&#xa0;PTX in second-line advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma, with potentially improved PFS, ORR and DCR, and similar overall survival. Safety analyses suggested generally comparable safety profiles across the two regimens. Fruq&#xa0;+&#xa0;PTX remains a valuable treatment option, offering important comparative evidence for clinical and health technology assessment decisions. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifiers: NCT07144995.

Adult