Using high-dimensional environmental covariates to study genotype by environment interaction for reproductive traits in Duroc boars.

Abstract

We investigated the potential of incorporating grid-cell-based environmental covariates (ECs) in the genetic evaluation of total sperm count (TSC), sperm motility (MOT), and sperm morphology (MOR) for Duroc boars. A total of 188,665 records derived from 3,684 genotyped boars, born between December 2018 and October 2024 and raised in three stud farms located in different U.S. states, were analyzed using multi-trait linear-threshold repeatability models. To account for genotype by environment interactions (GE), we constructed an interaction matrix as the Hadamard product of the genomic relationship matrix and an environmental (co)variance matrix. The environmental groups were defined in three ways: farm, farm-season, and farm-year-season. The (co)variance matrix was constructed based on daily ECs obtained from the NASA POWER database for each environmental group. Of all available ECs, those significantly associated with TSC, MOT, and MOR (temperature, relative humidity, atmospheric pressure, and wind speed and direction) were retained. We evaluated five models with different GE structures: M1 represented the baseline without accounting for GE, in M2 the GE included farm as environmental groups, in M3 the GE included farm-season as environmental groups, in M4 the GE included farm-year-season as environmental groups, and M5 involved M3 with an additional random effect of the farm-season. Estimates of heritability for TSC, MOT, and MOR ranged from 0.03 to 0.04, 0.05 to 0.08, and 0.04 to 0.08, respectively. Corresponding repeatability ranged from 0.15 to 0.23, 0.28 to 0.49, and 0.28 to 0.49. The proportion of phenotypic variance attributed to GE variance ranged from 0.00 to 0.32, 0.00 to 0.44, and 0.00 to 0.44. Lastly, estimates of genetic correlation, TSC-MOT, TSC-MOR, and MOT-MOR ranged from 0.27 to 0.31, 0.24 to 0.31, and 0.98 to 0.99, respectively, with minor differences across models. We assessed the predictive ability of models using the linear regression validation. Across traits and models, bias ranged from -0.05 to 0.02 standard deviations, slope varied from 0.88 to 0.99, the correlation ranged from 0.75 to 0.84, and accuracy from 0.41 to 0.53. Overall, building the GE matrix considering grid-cell-based ECs helped to account for GE, thereby reducing the proportion of phenotypic variance attributed to genetic components; however, it did not improve the validation metrics. Additional on-farm records for ECs may improve the model performance.