Effects of blood flow restriction training combined with plyometric training on lower limb muscle strength and motor unit recruitment in basketball players: An experimental study.

Jiqing Cui; Fangzhou He; Yufei Liu

doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2026.103422

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42604665

Effects of blood flow restriction training combined with plyometric training on lower limb muscle strength and motor unit recruitment in basketball players: An experimental study.

Jiqing Cui·Fangzhou He·Yufei Liu

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown that plyometric training (PT) improves neuromuscular function and explosive power but not maximal strength. Blood flow restriction training (BFR) combined with low-intensity resistance training (RT) increases muscle mass and strength. This study investigated the effects of PT, and BFR combined with PT on lower-limb muscle function. METHODS: Twenty elite basketball players were randomly assigned to two groups: PT-alone group (PT, n = 10) and BFR combine with PT group (PT-BFR, n = 10). All participants underwent bodyweight-based plyometric training three times per week for eight weeks. Peak torque values for hip and knee flexion and extension, as well as root mean square (RMS) values derived from electromyography, were measured before and after the intervention. RESULTS: After the 8-week intervention, both groups showed significant improvements in knee flexion and extension peak torque at 180°/s (all p < 0.01). Between-group comparisons revealed greater gains in the PT-BFR group for hip extension and flexion at 60°/s (p = 0.036-0.002; ηp2 = 0.225-0.233). RMS of the rectus femoris increased significantly more in the PT-BFR group than in the PT group (right: p = 0.004, ηp2 = 0.385; left: p = 0.020, ηp2 = 0.266), whereas no significant changes were observed in the gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior, or biceps femoris (all p > 0.05). CMJ height also improved more in the PT-BFR group, with a significant group × time interaction (p = 0.042, ηp2 = 0.210). CONCLUSION: Both training protocols enhanced bilateral lower-limb strength, with notable gains in the non-dominant leg; however, the magnitude did not differ substantially between groups. In contrast, compared with PT alone, BFR combined with PT produced superior enhancements in lower-limb muscle strength and neuromuscular recruitment. These findings suggest that when PT is employed to improve explosive power, it may be effectively combined with BFR to further augment muscular strength.

Explore related subjects

Humans Muscle Strength Basketball Plyometric Exercise Male Lower Extremity Muscle, Skeletal Resistance Training Young Adult Blood Flow Restriction Therapy Electromyography Blood flow restriction Motor unit recruitment Plyometric training Strength Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Jiqing Cui, Fangzhou He, Yufei Liu. 2026-08-16. Effects of blood flow restriction training combined with plyometric training on lower limb muscle strength and motor unit recruitment in basketball players: An experimental study.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2026.103422

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial resource Blood Flow Restriction Therapy subject Electromyography subject Humans subject Journal Article subject Lower Extremity subject Male subject Muscle Strength subject Muscle, Skeletal subject Plyometric Exercise subject Plyometric training subject Randomized controlled trials study

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Effects of Time-Based and Distance-Based Repeated Sprint Training on Physical and Physiological Adaptations in Collegiate Basketball Players.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the effects of time-based (TB) and distance-based (DB) repeated-sprint training (RST) on athletic performance adaptations in collegiate basketball players during preseason and to examine whether the 2 training prescriptions produce different levels of homogeneity in the magnitude of individual adaptations. METHODS: Thirty young male basketball players (age = 21.3 [1.4] y) were randomly and equally assigned to 3 groups (n = 10): DB-RST, TB-RST, and an active control group. Participants completed a 7-week RST program performed 3 times per week, consisting of 4 sets of 4 to 9 repetitions per session. The DB-RST group completed each sprint by covering a fixed 35-m distance, whereas the TB-RST group performed each sprint maximally for a fixed 5-second duration. Performance assessments including countermovement vertical jump, 20-m sprint, Illinois change-of-direction speed, reactive strength index, Wingate anaerobic power, and cardiorespiratory fitness were conducted before and after the 7-week training period. RESULTS: Both training groups demonstrated significant performance improvements over the 7-week intervention and relative to the control group (P < .05). Similar gains were observed in the magnitude of adaptations in the countermovement vertical jump, 20-m sprint, Illinois change-of-direction speed, and reactive strength index for the DB-RST and TB-RST groups. Interestingly, the TB-RST group showed more gains than the DB-RST in the magnitude of adaptations in the peak and mean power outputs, as well as cardiorespiratory fitness. Moreover, the TB-RST group showed lower intersubject variability in adaptive responses across the measured performance outcomes following the training intervention. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that RST effectively enhances the performance of basketball players, and that implementing a TB-RST protocol is more effective than a DB-RST approach for producing greater adaptations in physiological variables-specifically anaerobic power output and cardiorespiratory fitness-over the 7-week preseason period.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Skeletal Muscles Do Not Compete for Growth: Activating Additional Muscle Mass Does Not Compromise Changes in Muscle Size.

Kataoka, R, Yamada, Y, Hammert, WB, Sallberg, RW, Kang, A, Song, JS, Kassiano, W, Metcalf, EE, and Loenneke, JP. Skeletal muscles do not compete for growth: Activating additional muscle mass does not compromise changes in muscle size. J Strength Cond Res 40(9): 1043-1049, 2026-This study investigated whether the magnitude of muscle size and strength differed based on the amount of muscle recruited during training sessions. One hundred five untrained individuals were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: low-load unilateral elbow flexion exercise (a) to failure (LL-Failure, n = 36), (b) to failure and low-load knee extension exercise to failure (LL-Failure + Legs, n = 33), or (c) a time-matched nonexercise control (CON, n = 36). Training groups completed 18 supervised sessions over 6 weeks (2 sets at 30% 1 repetition maximum [1RM] to failure). LL-Failure + Legs group performed 4 additional sets of knee extension exercise in each leg (20-30 RM). Muscle thickness on the anterior upper arm (60 and 70% sites) and elbow flexor 1RM strength of the trained arm were measured at pretesting and posttesting. Changes were compared using the ANCOVA function of Bayes Factors for Informative Hypotheses (prevalues as the covariate). Specific hypotheses were evaluated by comparing Bayes factors and the posterior probabilities between models. Six weeks of training led to increases in muscle size and strength. However, performing additional leg exercise did not attenuate the muscle growth in the anterior upper arm (0.19 cm) compared with performing only arm exercise to failure (0.18 cm). Changes in 1RM strength also did not differ between training groups (0.32 and 0.25 kg for LL-Failure and LL-Failure + Legs, respectively). Overall, there was no evidence for competition of adaptations in muscle size and strength under uncontrolled nutritional conditions. Whether greater training volume or limited nutrient intake induces a competition for resources warrants further investigation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Effects of exercise on muscle strength and characteristics in rheumatic diseases and sarcopenia: Protocol for the Care for Muscle (C4M) Study.

OBJECTIVE: Muscle weakness is prevalent in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA) and sarcopenia (SARC). Endurance exercises may improve mitochondrial function and oxidative capacity, while strength exercises are thought to stimulate myofibrillar protein synthesis. This study aims to compare the effects of strength and endurance exercise and explore the association between muscle characteristics and exercise outcomes in patients with RA, OA and SARC. We hypothesize that responses to endurance and strength exercises in patients with muscle weakness are influenced by intramuscular pathology including muscle morphology, mitochondrial function, and systemic inflammation, based on their disease pathology, potentially requiring personalized training schedules. METHODS: This two-arm, parallel-group exploratory trial will enroll 69 patients (23 RA, 23 OA, 23 SARC), randomized to endurance (n = 35) or muscle strength exercises (n = 34), using minimization to balance disease type and gender. The 8-week intervention includes two supervised sessions per week using a controlled cable pulley device (Reforter™) and fitness equipment, plus one weekly home-based session. The primary outcome is isokinetic muscle strength (peak torque), measured with the Biodex system®. Secondary outcomes include muscle morphology, mitochondrial function, systemic inflammation and muscle endurance (by Biodex and 6 Minute Walk test). Muscle morphology will be assessed via 3D ultrasound imaging of the vastus lateralis. Mitochondrial function will be analyzed using high-resolution respirometry on muscle biopsies. Systemic inflammation will be measured using multiplex assays or ELISA on serum samples. DISCUSSION: This study will explore differential responses to muscle endurance and muscle strength exercises in patients with RA, OA, and SARC, offering novel insights into the molecular mechanisms of muscle weakness. The findings may help identify potential mechanisms underlying variability in exercise response and provide effect size estimates to guide future confirmatory studies and more targeted exercise interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06480643 (date of registration28-06-24).

Humans↗