Search PubMedSearch

subject

Blood Flow Restriction Therapy

Blood Flow Restriction Therapy: explore 4 source-linked works published from 2026 to 2026, with original documents and citations.

This collection is a preview while coverage and quality are evaluated.

Search within this collection

Coverage and selection

Includes records with this source-supplied label or an explicit phrase match in their metadata. Matches indicate a mention, not proof that a paper uses a method or tests a material. Source versions are consolidated by DOI.

Sources: pubmed. Collection updated 2026-09-15. Counts describe this index, not the complete source archives.

Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training at Different Levels of Arterial Occlusion Pressure on Body Composition and Athletic Performance in Youth Soccer Players: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

This study aimed to investigate the effects of low-load blood flow restriction training (BFRT) performed at different levels of arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) on body composition, maximal strength, and athletic performance in youth soccer players. Twenty-four male youth soccer players were randomly assigned to 40% AOP group, 60% AOP group, or control group. Participants in the BFRT groups performed lower-limb resistance training at 30% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) under the corresponding pressure conditions, whereas the control group trained without BFR. Training was conducted three times per week for six weeks. Body composition, back squat 1RM, countermovement jump (CMJ), T-test, and 30-m sprint performance were assessed before and after the intervention. Results showed that lower-limb muscle mass increased significantly in both the 40% AOP group (mean change = 0.55 kg, 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.97 kg, P = 0.010) and the 60% AOP group (mean change = 0.83 kg, 95% CI: 0.37 to 1.29 kg, P < 0.001), with the 60% AOP group showing significantly greater gains than the control group (between-group difference = 1.48 kg, 95% CI: 0.40 to 2.56 kg, P = 0.008). Back squat 1RM improved significantly in both the 40% AOP group (mean change = 6.50 kg, 95% CI: 3.90 to 9.10 kg, P < 0.001) and the 60% AOP group (mean change = 9.25 kg, 95% CI: 6.75 to 11.75 kg, P < 0.001), with the 60% AOP group demonstrating superior strength gains compared with the 40% AOP group (between-group difference = 2.94 kg, 95% CI: 0.20 to 5.68 kg, P = 0.048). CMJ height and T-test performance improved significantly in both the 40% AOP group (CMJ: mean change = 2.07 cm, 95% CI: 0.80 to 3.34 cm, P = 0.002; T-test: mean change = -0.23 s, 95% CI: -0.35 to -0.11 s, P = 0.001) and the 60% AOP group (CMJ: mean change = 2.65 cm, 95% CI: 1.00 to 4.30 cm, P = 0.003; T-test: mean change = -0.26 s, 95% CI: -0.38 to -0.14 s, P < 0.001), with no significant differences between the two BFRT groups (all P > 0.05). No significant changes were observed in 30-m sprint performance across groups (all P > 0.05). This study showed that six weeks of low-load (30% 1RM) blood flow restriction training performed at both 40% and 60% AOP was associated with improvements in lower-limb muscle mass, squat strength, and selected aspects of athletic performance in youth soccer players, compared with low-load training without BFR. While both pressure levels elicited comparable improvements in CMJ and agility performance, training at 60% AOP was associated with greater adaptations in lower-limb muscle mass and squat strength, with no additional benefits observed for 30-m sprint performance.

Humans

Effects of blood flow restriction training combined with plyometric training on lower limb muscle strength and motor unit recruitment in basketball players: An experimental study.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown that plyometric training (PT) improves neuromuscular function and explosive power but not maximal strength. Blood flow restriction training (BFR) combined with low-intensity resistance training (RT) increases muscle mass and strength. This study investigated the effects of PT, and BFR combined with PT on lower-limb muscle function. METHODS: Twenty elite basketball players were randomly assigned to two groups: PT-alone group (PT, n&#x202f;=&#x202f;10) and BFR combine with PT group (PT-BFR, n&#x202f;=&#x202f;10). All participants underwent bodyweight-based plyometric training three times per week for eight weeks. Peak torque values for hip and knee flexion and extension, as well as root mean square (RMS) values derived from electromyography, were measured before and after the intervention. RESULTS: After the 8-week intervention, both groups showed significant improvements in knee flexion and extension peak torque at 180&#xb0;/s (all p&#x202f;<&#x202f;0.01). Between-group comparisons revealed greater gains in the PT-BFR group for hip extension and flexion at 60&#xb0;/s (p&#x202f;=&#x202f;0.036-0.002; &#x3b7;p2 = 0.225-0.233). RMS of the rectus femoris increased significantly more in the PT-BFR group than in the PT group (right: p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.004, &#x3b7;p2 = 0.385; left: p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.020, &#x3b7;p2 = 0.266), whereas no significant changes were observed in the gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior, or biceps femoris (all p&#x2009;>&#x2009;0.05). CMJ height also improved more in the PT-BFR group, with a significant group &#xd7;&#x2009;time interaction (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.042, &#x3b7;p2 = 0.210). CONCLUSION: Both training protocols enhanced bilateral lower-limb strength, with notable gains in the non-dominant leg; however, the magnitude did not differ substantially between groups. In contrast, compared with PT alone, BFR combined with PT produced superior enhancements in lower-limb muscle strength and neuromuscular recruitment. These findings suggest that when PT is employed to improve explosive power, it may be effectively combined with BFR to further augment muscular strength.

Humans

Effects of passive blood flow restriction on muscle function following exercise-induced muscle damage in recreationally active males.

This investigation examined the effects of passive blood flow restriction (pBFR) on indices of exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD) in recreationally active males. Fifteen males completed six consecutive visits (&#xb1;2&#x2009;hours). Participants completed 3&#x2009;&#xd7;&#x2009;25 maximal, unilateral, isokinetic (60&#xb0;&#xb7;s-1), concentric-eccentric leg extensions on both legs. Each leg was randomly assigned to receive pBFR (80% arterial occlusion pressure) or sham (20&#x2009;mmHg) at 0, 24, 48, 72, and 96&#x2009;hours post-EIMD. Perceived muscle soreness, range of motion (ROM), pain pressure threshold (PPT), concentric peak torque (CPT), and maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) torque were assessed and analyzed using separate linear mixed-effects models. Perceived muscle soreness increased at 24&#x2009;hours (mean difference [meandiff] = 4.9 au; p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001) and recovered by 96&#x2009;hours (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.482), with no differences between conditions (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.450). ROM (meandiff&#x2009;=&#x2009;-3.1&#xb0;; p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.040), PPT (meandiff&#x2009;=&#x2009;-1.63 kgf; p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), CPT (meandiff&#x2009;=&#x2009;-27.7&#x2009;Nm; p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), and MVIC torque (meandiff&#x2009;=&#x2009;-30.8&#x2009;Nm; p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001) decreased at 24&#x2009;hours, with recovery occurring between 48-96&#x2009;hours. Condition-specific differences were observed for ROM (meandiff&#x2009;=&#x2009;2.5&#xb0;; p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), PPT (meandiff&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.49 kgf; p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.005), CPT (meandiff&#x2009;=&#x2009;6.2&#x2009;Nm; p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.020), and MVIC torque (meandiff&#x2009;=&#x2009;7.1&#x2009;Nm; p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.044), which were greater in pBFR than sham. These findings suggested that pBFR may reduce impairments in ROM, PPT, CPT, and MVIC torque following EIMD, despite a similar recovery trajectory between conditions.

Humans

Effects of blood flow restriction training combined with resistance training on lower-limb strength and sport-specific performance in athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: In contemporary sports science, athletes and coaches continuously explore strategies to reduce training load and injury risk while increasing muscular strength and sport-specific performance. This meta-analysis evaluated the effects of blood flow restriction training (BFRT) combined with resistance training (RT) on lower-limb muscle strength and sport-specific performance in athletes. METHODS: Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were systematically searched across major databases (e.g. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and Embase) from inception until November 2024. Two independent reviewers carefully assessed the studies. Data analysis was carried out using RevMan 5.4 software, which included heterogeneity testing, meta-analysis, subgroup analysis, and assessment of publication bias. RESULTS: Ten RCTs (181 athletes; 91 in the BFRT and RT group, 90 in the control group) were included. Outcomes determined BFRT combined with RT yielded notable enhancements in lower-limb muscle strength (SMD = 1.09, 95% CI [0.52, 1.66], p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.05) and muscle hypertrophy (MD = 1.09, 95% CI [0.10, 2.09], p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.05) compared to control training. However, no significant improvement in sport-specific performance was found (SMD = 0.11, 95% CI [-0.18, 0.40], p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.46). Substantial heterogeneity was observed for strength outcomes (I2 = 75%), whereas low heterogeneity was observed for sport-specific performance and hypertrophy outcomes (I2 = 0%). No evidence of significant publication bias was detected. CONCLUSION: BFRT combined with RT appears to provide effective augmentation of lower-limb muscle strength and hypertrophy in athletes compared to RT or conventional training alone. It may be prudent to integrate this approach systematically into training cycles to optimize physiological muscle stimulation and training outcomes, despite not directly improving sport-specific performance.

Humans
Compare source metadata on this page

These are bibliographic comparisons, not experimental rankings. Follow the original document for methods and conditions.