Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42580153

Stage shift, histological differentiation, and survival patterns of lung squamous cell carcinoma versus adenocarcinoma in low-dose CT screening.

Yaguang Fan·Ying Wang·Xuebing Li·Heng Wu·Hongli Pan·Yong Jiang·Zhaowei Meng·Jing Wang·Jun Chen·Qinghua Zhou·Youlin Qiao
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether LDCT-associated stage shift translates into similar survival patterns across lung cancer histologies remains uncertain. We compared stage shift, histological differentiation, tumor characteristics, and survival between lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) and adenocarcinoma (LUAD) in the National Lung Screening Trial. METHODS: Among participants diagnosed with LUSC or LUAD, stage distribution and histological differentiation were compared between LDCT and chest X-ray (CXR) arms. Survival among diagnosed cases was measured from randomization. Multivariable models tested screening arm-by-histology interactions. Screen-detected LDCT tumors were compared by histology. RESULTS: During 6.5 years of median follow-up, 498 LUAD and 249 LUSC cases were diagnosed in the LDCT arm, and 374 and 212, respectively, were diagnosed in the CXR arm. LDCT was associated with higher odds of stage I disease for LUAD (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.48; 95% CI 1.88-3.28) and LUSC (aOR, 1.71; 95% CI 1.17-2.48), without significant interaction (P&#x202f;=&#x202f;0.116). LDCT was associated with lower hazard of lung cancer-specific death among diagnosed LUAD cases (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.54; 95% CI 0.43-0.66), but not among diagnosed LUSC cases (aHR, 1.04; 95% CI 0.78-1.39; P for interaction<0.001). LUSC had lower screening sensitivity, more frequent detection in annual screening rounds, greater prediagnostic tumor size increase, and fewer well-differentiated stage I tumors than LUAD. CONCLUSION: LDCT was associated with stage shift for both subtypes, but favorable survival patterns among diagnosed cases were mainly observed for LUAD. Lower screening sensitivity, greater prediagnostic tumor size increase, and poorer histological differentiation may help explain why stage shift did not translate into similar survival patterns for LUSC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00047385.

Explore related subjects

HumansLung NeoplasmsFemaleCarcinoma, Squamous CellMaleTomography, X-Ray ComputedNeoplasm StagingMiddle AgedAgedAdenocarcinomaEarly Detection of CancerAdenocarcinoma of LungHistological differentiationLow-dose CTLung cancer screeningSquamous cell carcinomaStage shiftSurvivalJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yaguang Fan, Ying Wang, Xuebing Li, Heng Wu, Hongli Pan, Yong Jiang, Zhaowei Meng, Jing Wang, Jun Chen, Qinghua Zhou, Youlin Qiao. 2026-08-11. Stage shift, histological differentiation, and survival patterns of lung squamous cell carcinoma versus adenocarcinoma in low-dose CT screening.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2026.103197

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Comparative Study resourceAged subjectComparative Study subjectFemale subjectHumans subjectJournal Article subjectLung Neoplasms subjectMale subjectMiddle Aged subjectRandomized controlled trials study

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Validation of the lung immune prognostic index in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: Post hoc analysis of the caspian and IMpower133 phase 3 trials.

BACKGROUND: The Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI) is an inflammation-based biomarker associated with outcomes to immunotherapy across several tumor types. Its prognostic value in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), however, remains insufficiently validated. We aimed to validate the prognostic impact of LIPI in ES-SCLC using data from two phase III trials. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the CASPIAN (NCT03043872) and IMpower133 (NCT02763579) trials were included. LIPI groups were defined as good (dNLR<3 and LDH<ULN), intermediate (dNLR&#x2265;3 or LDH&#x2265;ULN) and poor (dNLR&#x2265;3 and LDH&#x2265;ULN). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed across LIPI categories and treatment arms. RESULTS: LIPI was available for 1140 patients (Good: 34%, Intermediate: 49%, Poor: 17%), including 708 treated with chemotherapy-immunotherapy and 432 with chemotherapy alone. Poor LIPI was associated with unfavorable characteristics, including lower albumin levels and higher rate of liver metastases. Median OS was 14.6 months (95%CI: 12.4-15.9) for LIPI Good, 10.9 (10.1-11.5) for Intermediate, and 8.4 (7.1-9.3) for Poor (p&#x202f;<&#x202f;0.0001). In multivariate models adjusted on gender, age, ECOG, treatment arm and metastatic sites, LIPI remained an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR Poor vs. Good: 1.76, 95%CI: 1.45-2.15, p&#x202f;<&#x202f;0.001) and PFS (HR: 1.59, 95%CI: 1.33-1.90, p&#x202f;<&#x202f;0.001). Although patients with poor LIPI derived limited benefit from immunotherapy, no significant treatment-LIPI interaction was observed. CONCLUSION: This large post hoc analysis confirms LIPI as a robust and clinically applicable prognostic biomarker in ES-SCLC. Patients with poor LIPI have substantially worse outcomes and limited benefit from immunotherapy, highlighting the need for novel therapeutic strategies in this subgroup.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Feasibility of routine clinical liquid-based cytology for lung cancer compact panel testing.

BACKGROUND: The Lung Cancer Compact Panel (cPANEL) is a recently approved highly sensitive multiplex gene panel in Japan that supports both DNA- and RNA-based next-generation sequencing. Although cytological specimens are acceptable for cPANEL, unfixed cell pellets or dedicated preservation tubes are typically recommended. However, evidence remains limited regarding whether residual liquid-based cytology (LBC) cell suspensions prepared for routine cytological diagnosis can be used directly for cPANEL testing without dedicated molecular preservation or additional preanalytical processing. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of applying LBC specimens that are widely used in contemporary clinical practice to cPANEL. METHODS: We analyzed DNA and RNA quality in 69 clinical LBC specimens. Among these, 51 specimens containing non-small cell lung cancer cells with previously determined driver alteration status were subjected to cPANEL testing to evaluate assay concordance with clinical companion diagnostic results. RESULTS: DNA integrity was generally well preserved (DNA Integrity Number [DIN]: 6.2&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;1.5). In contrast, RNA integrity showed greater variability (DV200: 16.4&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;12.1%). ThinPrep-fixed specimens demonstrated lower DIN and DV200 values compared with CytoRich Red-fixed specimens. Although all samples successfully passed the DNA-based cPANEL assay, six cases (11.8%) failed the RNA-based assay, with RNA yield being a major contributing factor. Among the 46 evaluable specimens, concordance was 95.7% and sensitivity was 92.3%, or 88.9% including RNA module failures as cPANEL-negative. CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate fixative selection and adequate cellularity, cPANEL using clinical LBC specimens may serve as a practical diagnostic platform. We demonstrated that routine LBC specimens can be directly applied to cPANEL without special preanalytical processing.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Patient-reported outcomes with tarlatamab in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer after platinum-based chemotherapy: results from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial.

BACKGROUND: Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is associated with a high symptom burden and impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This prespecified analysis from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial evaluated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for tarlatamab versus standard-of-care (SoC) chemotherapy following first-line platinum-based therapy. METHODS: DeLLphi-304 is a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 3 study in adults with ES-SCLC. PROs were assessed using validated instruments, including the EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-LC13, FACT-G GP5, BPI-SF, and the EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale. Change from baseline, response rates, and time to deterioration in these PROs were analyzed. RESULTS: PRO data from all 509 patients enrolled were evaluated. Compliance with QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 assessments remained above 69% through 19&#xa0;weeks. A higher proportion of patients receiving tarlatamab achieved symptom or functional improvement at 19&#xa0;weeks compared with SoC in chest pain (19% vs 10%), cough (35% vs 26%), dyspnea (22% vs 7%), physical functioning (13% vs 8%), and global health status (23% vs 15%), respectively. Tarlatamab also delayed deterioration in symptoms, physical functioning, and pain at worst relative to SoC. FACT-G GP5 results indicated that patients receiving tarlatamab were less bothered by treatment side effects over time. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to its previously reported antitumor activity, tarlatamab demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in symptoms and HRQoL compared with SoC. These findings support a favorable benefit-risk profile of tarlatamab in patients previously treated for ES-SCLC.

Humans↗