Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42586153

Reliability-aware hierarchical learning for Chagas disease screening from 12-lead ECGs: tackling label uncertainty and class imbalance.

Abstract

Objective.Chagas disease, a neglected tropical disease (NTD) with significant cardiovascular impact, remains underdiagnosed in resource-limited regions. Electrocardiogram (ECG) screening offers a low-cost tool for detecting cardiac involvement, yet algorithm development is challenged by label noise, data scarcity, and the latent nature of infection. This study proposes a robust ECG-based screening framework that explicitly addresses these constraints.Approach.We introduce aReliability-Aware Hierarchical Learningstrategy that calibrates supervision according to data provenance, prioritizing serology-confirmed labels over noisy self-reports. To mitigate data scarcity, we compare a specialized convolutional neural network (CNN) trained from scratch with a transfer learning approach based on a Spatio-Temporal ECG foundation Model (FM). Performance is evaluated across varying data scales, and the representation structure is analyzed to interpret model behavior.Main results.On the official hidden test set of the George B. Moody PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2025, our approach achieved a Challenge Score of 0.163. We observe that while the specialized CNN performs competitively in data-rich regimes, the FM exhibits superior robustness in extreme low-resource settings. Furthermore, performance reaches a plateau imposed by underlying disease physiology. Bimodal score distributions suggest that models distinguish established cardiomyopathy from indeterminate infection, which remains electrophysiologically indistinguishable from healthy controls.Significance.These findings clarify both the potential and intrinsic limits of ECG-based AI screening for NTD-associated cardiac involvement. Reliability-aware supervision and data-efficient transfer learning provide a practical framework toward scalable and clinically meaningful ECG screening systems in resource-constrained environments.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hao Wen, Jingsu Kang. 2026-09-01. Reliability-aware hierarchical learning for Chagas disease screening from 12-lead ECGs: tackling label uncertainty and class imbalance.. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ae98e0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison between measured and synthesized posterior lead electrocardiograms during percutaneous coronary intervention-induced myocardial ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Posterior/inferolateral myocardial ischemia is frequently underrecognized on standard 12&#x2011;lead electrocardiography (ECG). Synthesized posterior leads derived from the standard 12&#x2011;lead ECG have been proposed as an alternative to directly measured posterior leads; however, their accuracy under controlled ischemic conditions has not been fully validated. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 26 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in whom simultaneously recorded measured and synthesized posterior lead ECGs (V7-V9) were obtained during balloon-induced myocardial ischemia. ST-segment deviation was measured at the ST junction (STJ), 40&#xa0;ms (ST1), and 80&#xa0;ms (ST2) thereafter. Agreement between measured and synthesized posterior leads was assessed using Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analyses. As an exploratory patient-level analysis, diagnostic performance was compared with reciprocal anterior ST-segment depression (V1-V4). RESULTS: Strong correlations were observed between measured and synthesized posterior lead ST-segment deviations (V7: r&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.89; V8: r&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.86; V9: r&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.83; all P&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.001). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated minimal systematic bias (within &#xb1;0.004&#xa0;mV) and narrow limits of agreement. Synthesized posterior leads showed higher diagnostic performance than reciprocal anterior ST-segment depression (AUC 0.917 vs. 0.708), although the difference was not statistically significant (DeLong test, P&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.197). Using a 0.05&#xa0;mV threshold, synthesized posterior leads demonstrated 83.3% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 96.2% overall accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Synthesized posterior leads closely reproduced measured posterior lead ST-segment deviations during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-induced myocardial ischemia, supporting the technical validity of posterior lead reconstruction. Larger prospective studies are warranted to determine whether synthesized posterior leads provide incremental diagnostic value beyond careful interpretation of the standard 12&#x2011;lead ECG.

Humans

Physical reconfiguration of limb electrodes for Precordial Bipolar Lead acquisition: Morphological validation against digital subtraction.

BACKGROUND: The V2&#xa0;-&#xa0;V1 Precordial Bipolar Lead (PBL) selectively evaluates the right-to-left retrosternal axis and has shown diagnostic value beyond the standard 12&#x2011;lead electrocardiogram. However, its use has been limited by the need for raw electrocardiographic data and post-processing software. This study evaluated whether a simple physical reconfiguration of limb electrodes could reproduce the digitally derived V2&#xa0;-&#xa0;V1 morphology with sufficient accuracy for clinical application. METHODS: Thirty-seven subjects underwent two sequential 10-s 12&#x2011;lead recordings using a Cardiovit FT-1 electrocardiograph sampled at 1000&#xa0;Hz. In the standard recording, the digital PBL was calculated as V2&#xa0;-&#xa0;V1. In the second recording, the right-arm and left-arm electrodes were repositioned to the V1 and V2 sites so that Lead I directly recorded the retrosternal dipole. Signals were filtered, synchronized, and analyzed using median beats. Morphological agreement was assessed with Pearson correlation on Z-normalized signals, while absolute agreement was evaluated using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC (Lewis, 1931; Nehb, 1938 [1,2])), root mean square error (RMSE), and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Mean Pearson correlation between digital and physical PBL was 0.955 (SD 0.043), with segment-specific correlations of 0.953 (SD 0.054) for QRS and 0.967 (SD 0.052) for ST-T. Lin's CCC and ICC(2,1) were both 0.871 (SD 0.110), and RMSE was 0.091 (SD 0.049) mV. Bland-Altman analysis showed minimal bias (-0.008&#xa0;mV). CONCLUSIONS: Physical acquisition of the V2&#xa0;-&#xa0;V1 PBL achieved high agreement with the digitally derived signal, supporting a simplified analog method for broader clinical implementation.

Humans

Evaluation of the difference between automated and measured QTc intervals in children.

BACKGROUND: The corrected QT interval (QTc) is obtained through automated ECG computations or manual physician measurements. We hypothesized that differences exist in children between the measured and automated QTc intervals within and between Healthy and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) subjects with greater differences for HCM due to structural abnormalities. METHODS: QT measurements - Bazett correction- automated (aQTc) and measured (mQTc), were extracted from the GE MUSE database for 385 Healthy pediatric (single ECG) and 208 HCM subjects (2 ECGs), stratified by age&#xa0;<&#xa0;12 and&#xa0;&#x2265;&#xa0;12&#xa0;yrs., sex, race, and ethnicity. QTc means (SD), automated and measured differences, and the difference of the differences of aQTc and mQTc were analyzed overall and by subgroups. All ECGs were read by one pediatric cardiologist with a second cardiologist reading a random subset of HCM ECGs to evaluate intraclass correlations and agreement. RESULTS: The mQTc intervals were shorter than aQTc intervals within Healthy (p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.001) and within first HCM ECGs (p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.001) with both aQTc and mQTc shorter in Healthy than HCM (p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.001). The difference in these differences was significant overall using HCM ECG 1 but not HCM ECG 2. Healthy subject aQTc and mQTc intervals differed by age, sex, and race (p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.002). HCM ECG 1 aQTc- mQTc intervals differed for age&#xa0;<&#xa0;12&#xa0;yrs., as well as by sex and race. HCM ECG 2 intervals differed only for age&#xa0;<&#xa0;12&#xa0;yrs. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to measured values, automated QTc values were significantly longer in both Healthy and HCM subjects. Automated measurements may overestimate the QTc.

Humans