Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42584076

Evaluation of Oxford nanopore sequencing for antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Salmonella: comparison with phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility in a large-scale study.

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Salmonella is a major zoonotic foodborne pathogen, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Salmonella presents a significant public health challenge. Compared with conventional antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), whole-genome sequencing (WGS) provides a more rapid and comprehensive approach to AMR characterization, thereby informing antimicrobial selection and supporting public health surveillance. In this study, Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT)-based WGS was performed on 1,490 Salmonella isolates collected through nationwide surveillance in Taiwan in 2025. Genotypic resistance inferred from WGS data was compared with phenotypic AST results to assess the performance of ONT-WGS. Overall, WGS-inferred resistance showed high concordance with phenotypic resistance for most antimicrobials. However, major genotype-phenotype discordance was observed, attributed to four categories: (i) breakpoint-dependent classification, (ii) reduced or absent phenotypic expression of resistance genes, (iii) minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) modulation by ramAp, and (iv) absence of known AMR determinants. Notable discrepancies included tigecycline resistance without known genetic determinants, nalidixic acid resistance linked to ramAp-mediated MIC elevation, and a high prevalence of colistin resistance (35.7%) in S. Enteritidis, with most resistant isolates lacking identifiable AMR determinants. Additionally, a significant proportion of ESBL- and AmpC-producing isolates were classified as susceptible or intermediate to cefotaxime and ceftazidime under CLSI criteria, highlighting the potential for misclassification and treatment failure. These findings demonstrate that ONT-WGS enables accurate and comprehensive AMR characterization by directly identifying resistance determinants and avoiding potential misclassification associated with breakpoint-based AST interpretations. When interpreted appropriately, WGS can support better antimicrobial selection and serve as a valuable alternative to conventional susceptibility testing. IMPORTANCE: Accurate prediction of antimicrobial resistance is essential for appropriate therapy and effective surveillance of Salmonella. However, discordance between genotype-based predictions and phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) can complicate clinical interpretation. In this nationwide study of 1,490 Salmonella isolates, we show that Oxford Nanopore Technology-based whole-genome sequencing (ONT-WGS) provides rapid and comprehensive detection of antimicrobial resistance determinants with high concordance to phenotypic AST. We further identify four major mechanisms underlying genotype-phenotype discordance, including breakpoint-dependent classification, reduced or absent phenotypic expression of resistance genes, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) modulation by ramAp, and the absence of known AMR determinants. These findings demonstrate how WGS can complement conventional AST, improve interpretation of challenging susceptibility results, and strengthen genomic surveillance of emerging antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yu-Ping Hong, Ying-Shu Liao, You-Wun Wang, Shao-Chun Kuo, Ru-Hsiou Teng, Shiu-Yun Liang, Jui-Hsien Chang, Hsiao Lun Wei, Chien-Shun Chiou. 2026-08-12. Evaluation of Oxford nanopore sequencing for antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Salmonella: comparison with phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility in a large-scale study.. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01797-26

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

MIC-based tuberculosis drug susceptibility testing using Sensititre MYCOTB: a diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis.

Accurate drug susceptibility testing (DST) is crucial for designing effective regimens for multidrug-resistant (MDR) and pre-extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (pre-XDR TB). Sensititre MYCOTB enables simultaneous determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for multiple drugs, but its diagnostic performance varies across studies. This meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic performance of Sensititre MYCOTB for key MDR and pre-XDR TB drugs. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251230599). PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Scopus, ONOS, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and registries were systematically searched for studies published between 2010 and 2025. Studies comparing the Sensititre MYCOTB with reference DST for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) were included. Bias assessment and pooled diagnostic accuracy estimates were generated. Fourteen studies, including 1,728 isolates, were analyzed. Rifampicin and isoniazid demonstrated high sensitivity (0.976 [95% CI: 0.94-0.99] and 0.977 [95% CI: 0.95-0.99]) and specificity (0.958 [95% CI: 0.84-0.98] and 0.957 [95% CI: 0.83-0.99], respectively) with low heterogeneity. Amikacin, kanamycin, and ofloxacin demonstrate good diagnostic accuracy, with high specificity (>0.98 [95% CI]). Moderate diagnostic accuracy was observed for ethambutol, streptomycin, ethionamide, and rifabutin. Cycloserine, moxifloxacin, and para-aminosalicylic acid showed inconsistent performance despite excellent specificity (>0.97 [95% CI]). Sensitivity analysis partially improved pooled sensitivity for moxifloxacin 0.801 (95% CI: 0.585-0.924) and para-aminosalicylic acid 0.76 (95% CI: 0.518-0.894), whereas cycloserine remained at 0.436 (95% CI: 0.190-0.725), although heterogeneity persisted. Sensititre MYCOTB DST demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for MDR-TB and pre-XDR-TB drugs, while caution is required with cycloserine, moxifloxacin, and para-aminosalicylic acid. These findings support the integration of MIC-based testing into clinical decision-making.

Microbial Sensitivity Tests

Efficacy of the NMIC-150 system in identifying extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in clinical isolates.

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) are significant contributors to the growing global crisis of antimicrobial resistance. This study evaluated the performance of the NMIC-150 System for susceptibility testing of third-generation cephalosporins (3GCs) and assessed whether ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam could identify ESBL-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CREs). A total of 278 non-duplicate clinical isolates (Klebsiella pneumoniae, E. coli, and Proteus mirabilis) were analyzed. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using reference broth microdilution (BMD) and the NMIC-150 System. ESBL production was defined as an ≥eight-fold reduction in the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 3GCs in the presence of clavulanic acid, according to CLSI criteria. Whole-genome sequencing was performed to characterize ESBL and carbapenemase genes among 3GC-resistant isolates. A Random Forest model was used to predict ESBL-producing isolates based on MIC values. The NMIC-150 System demonstrated over 90% categorical and essential agreement with BMD for ceftazidime and ceftriaxone, along with robust predictive performance via Random Forest analysis. These findings suggest that the NMIC-150 System is a reliable platform for 3GC susceptibility testing and that an ≥eight-fold MIC reduction with ceftazidime-avibactam or aztreonam-avibactam may serve as a phenotypic indicator of ESBL production in CRE isolates. In conclusion, the NMIC-150 System shows potential for routine antimicrobial resistance surveillance and may facilitate the rapid identification of ESBL-producing CREs in clinical settings.

Microbial Sensitivity Tests

In vitro activity of contezolid and other comparators against clinical Staphylococcus and Enterococcus: a multicenter study in China.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the in vitro activity of contezolid against clinical Staphylococcus and Enterococcus isolates from across China, and compare its performance with linezolid and other key agents. METHODS: A total of 2510 non-duplicate Gram-positive cocci isolates were collected from 70 hospitals in seven Chinese regions. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using broth microdilution (BMD) per CLSI guidelines. MIC50/90 values, susceptibility rates, cumulative MIC curves and MIC distribution agreement between contezolid and linezolid were assessed. Linezolid-resistant isolates and contezolid-resistant isolates-defined as those based on CLSI 2025 linezolid breakpoints-underwent whole-genome sequencing and comprehensive screening for known oxazolidinone resistance determinants, including acquired resistance genes, 23S rRNA mutations and amino acid substitutions in ribosomal proteins L3, L4 and L22. RESULTS: Contezolid exhibited potent in vitro activity, with >99% of isolates inhibited at ≤4 mg/L and showed lower MIC50/90 than linezolid, with a consistently left-shifted cumulative MIC distribution. Cohen's kappa analysis supporting enhanced activity of contezolid. Notably, we report for the first time clinical isolates with contezolid MICs up to 16 mg/L. Whole-genome analysis of 14 linezolid-resistant isolates (including five resistant to contezolid) revealed universal presence of optrA, cfr, fexA and other resistance genes, alongside domain V 23S rRNA mutations and substitutions in ribosomal proteins L3 and L4, supporting a shared genetic basis and potential cross-resistance between the two agents. CONCLUSIONS: Contezolid demonstrated potent and consistent activity against drug-resistant Gram-positive cocci, supporting its potential as a therapeutic alternative to linezolid. Further studies are needed to confirm resistance mechanisms and clinical utility.

Microbial Sensitivity Tests