Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42579268

Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Three-Arm Randomized Trial of Enoxaparin Duration and Rivaroxaban.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious but preventable complication after bariatric surgery, most of them after hospital discharge. The optimal regimen and duration of post-discharge prophylaxis, particularly the role of direct oral anticoagulants, remain uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To estimate 30-day VTE and bleeding event rates in high-risk patients undergoing one-anastomosis gastric bypass who received 15-day enoxaparin, 30-day enoxaparin, or 30-day rivaroxaban prophylaxis, and to perform exploratory comparisons among the regimens. METHODS: In this randomized, open-label, three-arm clinical trial, high-risk adults undergoing laparoscopic OAGB were randomized before discharge (1:1:1) to enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously twice daily for 15 days, enoxaparin 40 mg twice daily for 30 days, or rivaroxaban 10 mg orally once daily for 30 days, after standardized in-hospital enoxaparin and early ambulation. Participants underwent clinical assessment and duplex ultrasonography of the lower-limb and porto-mesenteric veins on postoperative days 15 and 30. The primary outcome was objectively confirmed VTE within 30 days. Bleeding was classified as International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB). Because the expected event rate was low and no non-inferiority or equivalence margin was prespecified, comparisons were interpreted as exploratory. RESULTS: A total of 288 patients were randomized to 15-day enoxaparin (n = 97), 30-day enoxaparin (n = 97), or 30-day rivaroxaban (n = 94). One symptomatic lower-limb deep vein thrombosis occurred in the 15-day enoxaparin group (1.0%; 95% CI, 0.03%-5.6%); no VTE events occurred in the 30-day enoxaparin group (0%; 95% CI, 0%-3.7%) or the rivaroxaban group (0%; 95% CI, 0%-3.8%). Total bleeding occurred in 4/97 patients (4.1%) in each enoxaparin group and 8/94 patients (8.5%) in the rivaroxaban group. The absolute difference in total bleeding between rivaroxaban and 30-day enoxaparin was 4.4% points (95% CI, - 2.9 to 12.2), indicating substantial imprecision. No porto-mesenteric venous thrombosis was detected. CONCLUSION: Only one VTE event occurred, precluding reliable conclusions regarding comparative efficacy or prophylaxis duration. Bleeding estimates were also imprecise and do not establish comparative safety or equivalence between rivaroxaban and enoxaparin. The trial adds descriptive event-rate data from a standardized OAGB pathway, but larger multicenter studies with prespecified comparative hypotheses and assessment of adherence, oral tolerance, and drug exposure are required. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mohammed Elshwadfy Nageeb, Nagy Salah Ismail, Abdelkarem Ahmed Abdelkarem Mohamed, Mohamed Yacoub, Khaled Mosleh Torfa, Mohamed Nasr Shazly. 2026-08-11. Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Three-Arm Randomized Trial of Enoxaparin Duration and Rivaroxaban.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-026-08882-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: A GRADE-assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a common atherosclerotic disorder characterized by progressive arterial narrowing in the limbs. This study aims to determine the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban, focusing on major cardiovascular events, limb outcomes, and bleeding risks. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized comparative studies that compared rivaroxaban, either alone or in combination with aspirin, to placebo or standard care such as antiplatelet therapy. Risk ratios and hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were pooled using R v4.5.1 with an appropriate random-effects model applied. Subgroup analyses were performed according to rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus rivaroxaban alone. RESULTS: A total of 39,991 participants across 6 studies were included. Compared with control, use of rivaroxaban was linked to a significant reduction in composite efficacy outcomes (relative risk [RR] = 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.91, P < 0.001), risk of acute limb ischemia (RR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.55-0.78, P < 0.001), and thromboembolism (RR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.38-0.97, P = 0.037). Although rivaroxaban plus aspirin failed to show a significant reduction in the risk of amputation, rivaroxaban alone reported a significant risk reduction (RR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.30-0.85, P = 0.003). However, its use was associated with a significantly higher risk of major bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.54, 95% CI 1.38-1.72, P < 0.001) and International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis-defined bleeding (RR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.19-1.76, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed for stroke, myocardial infarction, major adverse limb events, fatal bleeding, mortality, or cardiovascular mortality. CONCLUSION: Rivaroxaban-based therapy reduced the trial-defined composite efficacy outcome, acute limb ischemia, and thromboembolism in patients with PAD, but increased the risk of major bleeding. These findings support individualized use of rivaroxaban-based therapy in carefully selected patients, balancing ischemic and limb-protective benefits against bleeding risk.

Humans

Direct Oral Anticoagulants as Primary or Secondary Treatment for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) and Associated Thromboembolism (HITT)-A Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is associated with a high risk for thrombosis. The role of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is still emerging and data are limited considering efficacy and safety among patients with HIT. The aim of this review is to evaluate current data on DOACs as primary or secondary treatment among patients with HIT. METHODS: This is a systematic review utilising Pubmed, Scopus and Embase online databases. Eligible studies were published up to December 2024 evaluating DOACs as primary or secondary treatment among patients with HIT and/or associated thrombosis (HITT). Primary outcomes included thrombosis rate (TR) and bleeding rate (BR) during follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 44 publications were included (29 case reports, 5 case studies and 10 cohort studies [n&#x2009;>&#x2009;10 patients]). Regarding treatment, 19 articles evaluated only rivaroxaban, 7 articles only apixaban, 11 articles only dabigatran and 7 articles more than one regimen. A total of 352 patients were included. Overall, 190 patients (53.8%) were given DOAC as primary treatment whereas 162 patients were given a parenteral treatment first and continued with a DOAC. Mean nadir platelet count at diagnosis was 63&#x2009;000/&#x3bc;L. HITT rate was 190/352 (53.9%; 8% had arterial thrombosis). Mean follow-up was 7.6&#x2009;months. TR was 20/352 (Pooled proportion&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.064 [95% CI&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.042-0.092]) (30% of them were new thromboses without initial thrombosis), and BR was 9/352 (Pooled proportion&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.039 [95% CI&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.022-0.062]). Finally, there was no difference found regarding TR and BR between primary or secondary treatment, and among different regimens. CONCLUSIONS: DOACs are associated with low rates of thrombosis and major bleeding among patients treated for HIT or HITT, either as primary or secondary treatment. However, the certainty of evidence is very low because of the quality and limitations of the available studies.

Humans

Variability in &#x3b2;-human chorionic gonadotropin concentrations following evacuation of a hydatidiform mole pregnancy: A retrospective cohort study from Vietnam.

BackgroundGestational trophoblastic disease refers to a group of tumors defined by abnormal trophoblastic proliferation. This disease produces a distinct tumor marker, beta-human chorionic gonadotropin, which can be useful for diagnosis and follow-up. The objective of this study was to investigate the variations in serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin levels after uterine evacuation as well and the progression of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.Materials and methodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted at Tu Du Hospital, Vietnam, between January 2019 and December 2020. All patients diagnosed with molar pregnancy were analyzed retrospectively based on serial serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin levels following uterine evacuation. Post-evacuation outcomes, including relapsed molar pregnancy and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, were also monitored.ResultsWe enrolled 560 patients with molar pregnancy, including 298 with complete hydatidiform mole and 262 with partial hydatidiform mole. Severe symptoms were more common in those with complete hydatidiform mole. Over the follow-up period, 97 cases of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia were noted. The data show that the median time to gestational trophoblastic neoplasia diagnosis was 8.75&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;4.41 (4-26) weeks. In terms of variations in the serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin levels, the generalized estimating equation model showed a faster decline in the complete hydatidiform mole group than in the partial hydatidiform mole group. Similarly, regression in serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin levels was significantly more rapid in patients who progressed to gestational trophoblastic neoplasia than in those with relapsed molar pregnancy (-11,593 vs. -20,651.22 and -12,946.26 vs. -46,329.23 mUI/mL, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001).ConclusionsSurveillance of serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin levels remains essential for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia monitoring in patients with molar pregnancy following surgical evacuation. The post-evacuation serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin level regression curve helps distinguish gestational trophoblastic neoplasia from hydatidiform moles. Further evidence is required to strengthen these findings.

Humans