Search PubMed⌕ Search

subject

Bariatric Surgery

Bariatric Surgery: explore 10 source-linked works published from 2025 to 2026, with original documents and citations.

This collection is a preview while coverage and quality are evaluated.

Search within this collection

Coverage and selection

Includes records with this source-supplied label or an explicit phrase match in their metadata. Matches indicate a mention, not proof that a paper uses a method or tests a material. Source versions are consolidated by DOI.

Sources: pubmed. Collection updated 2026-09-15. Counts describe this index, not the complete source archives.

PubMed2026

Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Three-Arm Randomized Trial of Enoxaparin Duration and Rivaroxaban.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious but preventable complication after bariatric surgery, most of them after hospital discharge. The optimal regimen and duration of post-discharge prophylaxis, particularly the role of direct oral anticoagulants, remain uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To estimate 30-day VTE and bleeding event rates in high-risk patients undergoing one-anastomosis gastric bypass who received 15-day enoxaparin, 30-day enoxaparin, or 30-day rivaroxaban prophylaxis, and to perform exploratory comparisons among the regimens. METHODS: In this randomized, open-label, three-arm clinical trial, high-risk adults undergoing laparoscopic OAGB were randomized before discharge (1:1:1) to enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously twice daily for 15 days, enoxaparin 40 mg twice daily for 30 days, or rivaroxaban 10 mg orally once daily for 30 days, after standardized in-hospital enoxaparin and early ambulation. Participants underwent clinical assessment and duplex ultrasonography of the lower-limb and porto-mesenteric veins on postoperative days 15 and 30. The primary outcome was objectively confirmed VTE within 30 days. Bleeding was classified as International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB). Because the expected event rate was low and no non-inferiority or equivalence margin was prespecified, comparisons were interpreted as exploratory. RESULTS: A total of 288 patients were randomized to 15-day enoxaparin (n = 97), 30-day enoxaparin (n = 97), or 30-day rivaroxaban (n = 94). One symptomatic lower-limb deep vein thrombosis occurred in the 15-day enoxaparin group (1.0%; 95% CI, 0.03%-5.6%); no VTE events occurred in the 30-day enoxaparin group (0%; 95% CI, 0%-3.7%) or the rivaroxaban group (0%; 95% CI, 0%-3.8%). Total bleeding occurred in 4/97 patients (4.1%) in each enoxaparin group and 8/94 patients (8.5%) in the rivaroxaban group. The absolute difference in total bleeding between rivaroxaban and 30-day enoxaparin was 4.4% points (95% CI, - 2.9 to 12.2), indicating substantial imprecision. No porto-mesenteric venous thrombosis was detected. CONCLUSION: Only one VTE event occurred, precluding reliable conclusions regarding comparative efficacy or prophylaxis duration. Bleeding estimates were also imprecise and do not establish comparative safety or equivalence between rivaroxaban and enoxaparin. The trial adds descriptive event-rate data from a standardized OAGB pathway, but larger multicenter studies with prespecified comparative hypotheses and assessment of adherence, oral tolerance, and drug exposure are required. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

A two-center randomized clinical superiority trial of single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy for severe obesity: SASSY study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass is a novel metabolic bariatric surgery intended to enhance metabolic outcomes and reduce the risk of postoperative complications. Although preliminary outcome data for single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass are promising, evidence from adequately powered, randomized head-to-head comparisons is scarce. This trial compares the efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy in patients with class II obesity (body mass index = 35.0-39.9 kg/m²) with at least one obesity‑related comorbidity or class III obesity (body mass index ⩾40.0 kg/m²). METHODS: This two-center randomized clinical superiority trial enrolls patients eligible for metabolic bariatric surgery at two specialized Norwegian centers. Included patients are randomly assigned (1:1) to either single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass or sleeve gastrectomy with standardized perioperative treatment and care. The primary endpoint is the between-group difference in change in body mass index from baseline to 2 years after single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy. Secondary endpoints include additional weight loss outcomes, the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease, surgical and postoperative complications, obesity-related comorbidities, nutritional status, bone mineral density, gastrointestinal symptoms, quality of life, and rates of revisional and conversion surgery. All endpoints will be evaluated at 2 and 5 years after surgery. Statistical analyses utilize linear mixed models and analysis of covariance within an intention-to-treat framework. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide high-level evidence with robust and comparative outcome data on single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, aiming to clarify the clinical utility of single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass and inform surgical practice. Findings will address gaps in medium- and long-term evidence regarding weight loss, safety, comorbidity resolution, and quality of life following single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Smartphone apps for obesity management: A systematic review using self-determination theory.

BACKGROUND: While bariatric surgery and pharmacotherapy are effective treatments for obesity, ongoing supportive care remains a challenge. Smartphone applications (apps) may assist with symptom management, but their effectiveness and practical use in obesity treatment is unclear. This review evaluated the effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility of these apps in supporting individuals following obesity treatment. To better understand how these apps may promote sustained engagement and behaviour change, their design was analysed using Self-Determination Theory (SDT). METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and CENTRAL databases. Eligible studies included randomised and non-randomised interventions involving adults (≥18 years) with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) who had undergone bariatric surgery or pharmacotherapy. Interventions had to include an app designed to support post-treatment symptom management. Findings were synthesised narratively, and app features were mapped to SDT constructs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. RESULTS: Five studies (three RCTs, two cohort studies) involving 1,133 participants were included (female: 78 %; median age: 47.63 years). Most apps targeted post-bariatric surgery care; only one focused on pharmacotherapy. Common features included tracking, reminders, and education, supporting autonomy and competence. Relatedness features such as communication and peer support were least represented. Two studies reported improvements in weight-related outcomes and one in medication adherence. Effects on quality of life, self-efficacy, and healthcare utilisation were not significant. Patient satisfaction was reported in one study, with 95 % expressing positive feedback, though formal assessments of feasibility and acceptability were limited. CONCLUSION: Smartphone apps show potential to support obesity management, particularly after bariatric surgery. While some evidence suggests benefits for weight loss and adherence outcomes, the limited studies and variability of reporting prevent conclusive observations in other outcomes. Future app development should integrate behavioural theory to address psychological needs, nutritional risks and promote holistic self-management beyond weight control.

Female↗
PubMed2026

Rationale, design, and experiences from the vanguard phase of the bariatric surgery for the reduction of cardiovascular events (BRAVE) trial.

BACKGROUND: Observational studies suggest that metabolic/bariatric surgery (MBS) reduces mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with obesity, but adequately powered randomized trials (RCTs) are lacking. The Bariatric Surgery for the Reduction of Cardiovascular Events (BRAVE) trial was designed to address this evidence gap. METHODS: BRAVE is an investigator-initiated, multi-center, open-label RCT with blinded endpoint adjudication comparing MBS vs guideline-based medical weight management (MWM) in adults with obesity and high-risk cardiovascular disease (CVD). Eligible participants have a body-mass index ≥35 kg/m² or ≥30 kg/m² with type 2 diabetes or age >55 years, and prior myocardial infarction (MI), coronary intervention, heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation (AF) with elevated CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, cerebrovascular disease, or peripheral arterial disease. Participants are randomized 1:1 to MBS (sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, or duodenal switch) or MWM, which includes dietary, behavioral, and pharmacologic therapies. The primary outcome is the composite of all-cause death, MI, stroke, HF events, coronary revascularization, AF hospitalization, and renal events. A vanguard phase of 200 participants was implemented to optimize recruitment and logistics. RESULTS: As of October 2025, 2,514 individuals have been screened from 17 centers in Canada, Brazil, Italy and Spain, with 444 entered MBS work-up, and 200 have been randomized. The randomized cohort (mean age 59.8 years; 37% female; mean BMI 44.0 kg m⁻²) has high burden of hypertension (82%), diabetes (45%), coronary artery disease (44%), HF (39%), and AF (48%). Recruitment barriers were identified and addressed through targeted education and enhanced patient engagement. CONCLUSIONS: BRAVE is the first large RCT evaluating whether MBS safely reduces major cardiovascular events compared with medical therapy in high-risk patients with obesity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05531474.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Late hiatal hernia after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review.

Obesity is a global public health issue. This condition is linked to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and hiatal hernia (HH), both of which are exacerbated by increased intra-abdominal pressure. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is one of the most widely performed techniques for treating obesity and is considered a versatile option suitable for most patients. The development of a symptomatic HH and pouch migration can lead to various symptoms and complications. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central were searched for studies with late HH after RYGB. We pooled outcomes for symptom resolution. Secondary outcomes were recurrence rate and operation characteristics (mesh use, cruroplasty, gastropexy, reoperation, length of stay, and operative time). A meta-analysis could not be conducted due to significant heterogeneity in HH. HH following RYGB presents with GERD (39-93.6%), obstructive symptoms (29%-88%), and abdominal pain (28.6%-71%). Diagnostic methods include endoscopy, computed tomography scans, and upper gastrointestinal series. Surgical management varies, with primary cruroplasty being the most common approach, sometimes incorporating mesh or fundoplication. Postoperative symptom resolution rates range from 42.9% to 100%, with HH recurrence occurring in 5%-6.54% of cases. Follow-up durations varied, showing improvement in most patients, though some continued to experience reflux and dysphagia HH contributes to obstructive and reflux symptoms, with contrast-enhanced imaging offering the highest diagnostic accuracy. Bioabsorbable mesh may reduce recurrence, highlighting the need for long-term monitoring.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Effect of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy on Male Sexual Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Obesity negatively impacts male sexual function and fertility through hormonal imbalances, endothelial dysfunction, and psychosocial factors. Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) constitutes an effective intervention; however, procedure-stratified changes in male reproductive parameters after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) remain incompletely synthesized. METHODOLOGY: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted in November 2024. Sexual function, testosterone levels, and semen quality were included. Risk of bias was assessed using MINORS criteria. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed separately for each surgical modality, with heterogeneity quantified via I2 statistics. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies comprising 848 patients were included. Meta-analysis of pre-post data demonstrated that both RYGB and SG were independently associated with improvements in sex hormone-binding globulin and testosterone levels. In studies examining SG, significant improvements were observed in erectile function (SMD: 1.38, 95% CI: 0.66-2.10, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.0002) and sperm concentration (SMD: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.56-1.26, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.00001). Studies evaluating RYGB did not demonstrate statistically significant changes in erectile function (SMD: 0.62, 95% CI: -0.06 to 1.30, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.07) or sperm concentration (SMD: -0.01, 95% CI: -0.45 to 0.42, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.95). CONCLUSION: The meta-analytical findings suggest beneficial effects of both RYGB and SG on male hormonal parameters. Studies of SG demonstrated significant improvements in erectile function and sperm concentration. However, direct comparative analyses between the two procedures were not performed, precluding definitive conclusions regarding their relative efficacy. Future research necessitates head-to-head comparisons with standardized reproductive endpoints and extended follow-up periods.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

The Incidence of Suicide Following Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Prognosis Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) effectively manages severe obesity but may lead to psychological complications such as completed suicides and suicide attempts. This review aimed to analyze suicide and self-harm incidence post-MBS. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library databases on August 16, 2022, for longitudinal studies with incidence data on suicide following MBS. We performed a single proportion meta-analysis on the incidence of outcomes and assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022352137). RESULTS: Eighty-four studies were included. The meta-analysis showed an incidence of 230.64 suicides per 100,000 participants (95% CI: 167.51 to 317.49) in pooled individual-level data and an incidence of 43.02 suicides per 100,000 person-years (95% CI: 32.49 to 56.97) in pooled person-year data. Evidence was low certainty or very low certainty. CONCLUSIONS: The average suicide incidence (231 per 100,000 people) in people with obesity who underwent MBS significantly exceeded the 2019 WHO global estimate for the general population (nine per 100,000 people). These findings underscore the need to incorporate structured psychological screening and follow-up into the perioperative management process of MBS, as patient mental health may play a pivotal role in postoperative adherence and long-term outcomes.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

The Neurological Impact of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review of Post-Operative Neuropathic and Non-Neuropathic Complications.

Metabolic and bariatric surgery achieves durable weight loss and meaningful improvement in obesity-related comorbidities yet carries a risk of neurological complications that remains under-recognised in routine clinical practice. This systematic review, registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024591611) and conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, searched MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, CINAHL and Cochrane databases through September 2023 to evaluate the incidence, spectrum, timing, pathophysiology and management of post-operative neurological complications. Twelve studies comprising over 5000 patients were included. Reported incidence ranged from 1.4% to 16%, with peripheral neuropathy the most frequent manifestation. Mononeuropathies, particularly carpal tunnel syndrome, were prominent in several cohorts, while central complications including Wernicke encephalopathy occurred less commonly but with considerably greater severity. Thiamine deficiency was the predominant aetiological factor. Onset varied from days to several years postoperatively, with early presentations typically compression-related and later ones nutritionally mediated. Outcomes were generally favourable with early intervention, though severe or delayed cases were associated with persistent neurological deficits and occasional mortality. Neurological complications after bariatric surgery are heterogeneous and largely preventable, and structured post-operative follow-up with consistent adherence to nutritional supplementation remains central to reducing long-term harm.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Effect of Bariatric Surgery on Improvement of Retinal Microvasculature in Patients With Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Obesity is associated with adverse retinal microvascular changes, including narrower central retinal arteriolar equivalent (CRAE), wider central retinal venular equivalent (CRVE) and lower arteriovenous ratio (AVR). Although bariatric surgery improves cardiometabolic risk, its effect on retinal microvascular calibre remains uncertain. We systematically searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, ScienceDirect and Scopus up to June 2026. Prospective cohort studies reporting CRAE, CRVE or AVR before and after bariatric surgery in patients with obesity were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Eight prospective cohort studies including 283 patients were included. Seven studies contributed to the CRAE and CRVE analyses, and seven contributed to the AVR analysis. Bariatric surgery was associated with a significant increase in CRAE (MD&#x2009;=&#x2009;+4.02&#x2009;&#x3bc;m, CI [0.26-7.78], p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.04). Sensitivity analysis excluding one study showed a stronger and more consistent effect (MD&#x2009;=&#x2009;+5.41&#x2009;&#x3bc;m, CI [4.59-6.22], p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.01). CRVE significantly decreased after surgery (MD&#x2009;=&#x2009;-6.75&#x2009;&#x3bc;m, CI [-7.42 to -6.07], p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.01), while AVR significantly increased (MD&#x2009;=&#x2009;+0.03, CI [0.02-0.05], p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.01). Sensitivity analyses suggested that the direction of effect was generally robust, although between-study heterogeneity was present. Bariatric surgery may be associated with favourable retinal microvascular changes in patients with obesity, reflected by increased CRAE and AVR and decreased CRVE.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

Zinc status following different bariatric procedures: systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated perioperative changes in serum zinc levels following different bariatric procedures and provided evidence-based recommendations for postoperative monitoring and supplementation. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science and CNKI were systematically searched from inception to July 2025. Eligible studies compared pre- and postoperative serum zinc levels in individuals with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and the certainty of evidence was graded using the GRADE approach. Pooled analyses were conducted with StataSE 17.0. RESULTS: Twelve studies including 2,529 participants were analysed, with overall quality rated as high. Compared with baseline, pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) in serum zinc at 3&#x2009;months, 6&#x2009;months, 1&#x2009;year, and 2&#x2009;years postoperatively were -0.12 (95% CI: -0.27 to 0.04, I2&#xa0;= 57.9%, &#x3c4;2 = 0.0265, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.149), -0.36 (95% CI: -0.58 to -0.14, I2&#xa0;= 82.2%, &#x3c4;2 = 0.1043, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.001), -0.35 (95% CI: -0.53 to -0.16, I2&#xa0;= 81.9%, &#x3c4;2 = 0.0769, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.001), and -0.36 (95% CI: -0.95 to 0.24, I2&#xa0;= 97.2%, &#x3c4;2 = 0.3515, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.240), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed no significant changes at 3&#x2009;months across procedures. However, zinc levels significantly decreased at 6 and 12&#x2009;months after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and mini-gastric bypass (MGB), but not after sleeve gastrectomy (SG). At 2&#x2009;years, no significant reduction was observed in any group. The certainty of evidence for zinc changes was rated as moderate. CONCLUSION: Serum zinc levels decline significantly during the first postoperative year, particularly after RYGB and MGB, while SG shows minimal impact. Routine zinc monitoring and individualized supplementation are recommended within the first year after surgery to prevent deficiency-related complications. REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251138846.

Humans↗
Compare source metadata on this page
WorkPublishedSource identifierSource
Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Three-Arm Randomized Trial of Enoxaparin Duration and Rivaroxaban.2026-08-11PMID 42579268pubmed
A two-center randomized clinical superiority trial of single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy for severe obesity: SASSY study protocol.2026-08-05PMID 42557777pubmed
Smartphone apps for obesity management: A systematic review using self-determination theory.2026-08-03PMID 42546531pubmed
Rationale, design, and experiences from the vanguard phase of the bariatric surgery for the reduction of cardiovascular events (BRAVE) trial.2026-07-25PMID 42501951pubmed
Late hiatal hernia after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review.2026-06-04PMID 42379986pubmed
Effect of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy on Male Sexual Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.2026-04-21PMID 42014119pubmed
The Incidence of Suicide Following Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Prognosis Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies.2026-03-16PMID 41840962pubmed
The Neurological Impact of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review of Post-Operative Neuropathic and Non-Neuropathic Complications.2026PMID 42557049pubmed
Effect of Bariatric Surgery on Improvement of Retinal Microvasculature in Patients With Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.2026PMID 42723208pubmed
Zinc status following different bariatric procedures: systematic review and meta-analysis.2025-12-31PMID 41475404pubmed

These are bibliographic comparisons, not experimental rankings. Follow the original document for methods and conditions.