Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42575313

Opposing kinase signaling may underlie the inverse relationship between cancer and Alzheimer's disease.

Abstract

Cancer and Alzheimer's disease (AD) are leading causes of mortality and exhibit an inverse relationship, where AD patients have reduced cancer risk and vice versa. However, the molecular basis of this relationship remains poorly understood. We reanalyzed published proteomic and phosphoproteomic datasets to investigate this relationship. Differentially abundant proteins were identified in lung adenocarcinoma and glioblastoma samples relative to controls and compared with proteins altered in AD brains, revealing 37 proteins with opposing abundance patterns. Protein-protein interaction and pathway analyses revealed enrichment in kinase signaling and phosphorylation pathways. Phosphoproteomic analysis identified 52 differentially phosphorylated sites with opposing patterns, while kinase-substrate enrichment analysis identified 44 kinases with opposing inferred activity profiles. Integration of kinase activity and phosphosite data identified 29 kinase-phosphosite pairs, including 4 prioritized pairs with opposing patterns relevant to both diseases. Across seven independent cancer cohorts, 17 of 20 statistically significant phosphosite-cohort comparisons (85%) were concordant with the discovery findings, supporting reproducibility of the prioritized phosphosites. Together, these findings highlight opposing kinase signaling as a prominent feature of the inverse relationship and suggest potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets. This study provides a novel systems-level framework for investigating inverse relationships, supported by an R Shiny application for data exploration (https://advscancer.shinyapps.io/advscancer/). SIGNIFICANCE: This study presents an integrated proteomic and phosphoproteomic framework for investigating the inverse relationship between cancer and Alzheimer's disease (AD). By integrating differential protein abundance, phosphosite phosphorylation, inferred kinase activity, and curated kinase-substrate relationships, we identified opposing signaling patterns and prioritized four kinase-phosphosite pairs. Independent evaluation across seven CPTAC cancer cohorts supported the reproducibility of the prioritized phosphosite patterns. These findings provide insight into molecular processes potentially associated with the inverse relationship between cancer and AD, identify candidate biomarkers and therapeutic targets, and demonstrate the value of systems-level, data-driven approaches for investigating shared and opposing disease processes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Joyce Fang, Xinkun Wang. 2026-08-10. Opposing kinase signaling may underlie the inverse relationship between cancer and Alzheimer's disease.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2026.105723

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

GPR3 in neuro-metabolic-immune-reproductive nexus - a potential therapeutic target for Multi-System diseases.

BACKGROUND: GPR3(G-protein-coupled receptor 3), an orphan G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) with constitutive Gs activity, is expressed in the brain, liver, ovary, and other tissues, regulating cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis across the nervous, reproductive, immune, and metabolic systems. This review synthesizes evidence on its integrated signaling and physiological functions to address the lack of a comprehensive multisystem pathophysiology overview. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed and Web of Science, using keywords such as "GPR3", "GPCR", "neurodegeneration", "metabolism", "immune", "reproduction", "agonist", "inhibitor", and "therapeutic target". This search identified GPR3's roles in neurodegenerative diseases, immune inflammation, reproduction, and energy metabolism. The analysis focused on signaling pathways, ligand regulation, and therapeutic potential. RESULTS: The research indicates that GPR3 is involved in neuronal survival, synaptic plasticity, and microglial activity via the cAMP/PKA, PI3K/Akt, and β - arrestin pathways. It promotes amyloid - β formation in Alzheimer's disease (AD), yet provides neuroprotection in Parkinson's disease (PD) models. It may contribute to anxiety/depression - like states, maintain oocyte meiotic arrest in the ovary, and activate thermogenic genes in adipose tissue. GPR3 modulates immune responses. Using oleic acid (OA) and diphenyleneiodonium (DPI) as activators, and AF64394 and cannabidiol (CBD) as antagonists, it shows potential in disease models. CONCLUSION: GPR3 acts as a central molecular hub integrating neural, metabolic, immune, and reproductive signaling, highlighting its potential as a therapeutic target for chronic multisystem disorders. However, its dual roles in certain pathologies and translation challenges necessitate further research.

Humans

Insights from changes in NDEV biomarkers of metabolism: effects of PPARγ and GLP1 receptor agonists on brain metabolism.

BACKGROUND: Insulin resistance (IR) is implicated in central nervous system disorders, including depression and Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: We analyzed biological samples from two cohorts of clinical trial participants: (1) participants with unremitted depression after six months of treatment as usual who received pioglitazone (PPARγ agonist, N = 12) or placebo and (2) middle-aged participants at genetic risk for AD who received liraglutide (glucagon-like peptide 1 [GLP1] receptor agonist, N = 15) or placebo. These cohorts, which previously showed treatment-related improvements in peripheral IR, were used to assess the effects of pioglitazone and liraglutide on CNS insulin signaling using neuron-derived extracellular vesicles (NDEVs) as biomarkers. We utilized biological samples to measure biomarkers of IR in NDEVs. Eleven Akt-mTOR pathway proteins were measured before and after 12 weeks of treatment in both groups. RESULTS: Participants who received pioglitazone experienced broader changes, with significant increases in GSK3β (Ser9), mTOR (Ser2448), and RPS6 (Ser235/Ser236; all P ≤ .02) compared with placebo, and 77% of participants showed mTOR (Ser2448) response. Participants who received liraglutide demonstrated significantly increased NDEV-associated phosphorylated Akt (Ser473) and mTOR (Ser2448; P = .04 and P = .025, respectively) compared with placebo, with 40% and 30% of participants in the liraglutide group showing biomarker response in both Akt (Ser473) and mTOR (Ser2448), respectively. These effects appeared relatively independent from changes in fasting plasma insulin and glucose concentration at 120-minutes during the oral glucose tolerance test. DISCUSSION: Our findings demonstrate CNS-specific biomarker responses to both PPARγ agonists and GLP1 receptor agonists.

Humans

From prediction to mechanism: Explainable AI uncovers plasma and CSF proteomic signatures of Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteomics can distinguish AD from cognitively normal controls, but the generalizability of machine learning performance and the recurrence of biological signals across datasets require cautious interpretation. We developed an explainable artificial intelligence framework spanning two fluids and four ADNI proteomic datasets, covering 2082 modality specific samples, all analysed internally within ADNI. Phase 1 analysed plasma using a 119 analyte NULISA and targeted UPENN panel (n&#xa0;=&#xa0;727; 216&#xa0;CE, 511 controls). Phase 2 extended the analysis to CSF using SOMAscan7k, TMT-MS and targeted SET2, with Elecsys A&#x3b2;42, A&#x3b2;40, total tau and p-tau181 as anchor biomarkers. Only SOMAscan was subject-independent relative to Phase 1 plasma; TMT-MS and SET2 overlapped with Phase 1 for 96.0% and 97.7% of subjects and therefore are not independent replication cohorts. Under subject-level splits with fold internal preprocessing, we compared Elastic Net, Explainable Boosting Machines and gradient boosted trees with SHAP-based explanations. Among the candidate pipelines, we selected the pipeline with the highest held-out test ROC AUC for each platform; the selected values were 0.927 in plasma and 0.954-0.973 across the three CSF datasets. Because the same held out test performance was used for pipeline selection and headline reporting, these are optimistically selected single-holdout estimates, not unbiased estimates of generalizable or clinical performance. Explanations identified five recurring biological axes within ADNI: cholinergic (ACHE), tau/14-3-3 (YWHAG, YWHAZ, YWHAB, YWHAE), neuro-axonal (NEFL, NEFH), microglial/complement (CHIT1, SMOC1, CHI3L1, C7, CFH) and synaptic (NPTXR, NPTX2, DLG4, SYT5, VSNL1, ELAVL2). CSF analyses showed synaptic vesicle-cycle enrichment (q&#xa0;=&#xa0;2&#xa0;&#xd7;&#xa0;10-6), and CSF YWHAG correlated strongly with total tau (&#x3c1;&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.87). Cross-fluid directional concordance was modest overall (54-57%) but increased to 73-80% among mapped analyte/protein rows reaching q&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.05 in CSF. These findings provide hypothesis-generating, internally supported evidence within ADNI. Independent external cohorts with locked pipelines are required to evaluate generalizable performance and biological reproducibility; the overlapping TMT-MS and SET2 analyses should not be interpreted as independent replication.

Alzheimer Disease