Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42476523

Venous Sinus Stenting for Pulsatile Tinnitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sevda Alipour Khabir·Julien Ognard·Gerard El Hajj·Natália Vasconcellos De Oliveira Souza·Owen Heidtke·Tor Lindell·Esref Bayraktar·Cem Bilgin·Sherief Ghozy·Ramanathan Kadirvel·David F Kallmes·Waleed Brinjikji
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulsatile tinnitus (PT) is frequently caused by venous sinus stenosis and may be associated with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Venous sinus stenting (VSS) directly addresses venous outflow obstruction and has emerged as a therapeutic option; however, outcome data remain heterogeneous. We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and durability of VSS for PT and to compare outcomes between IIH-associated and isolated PT. METHODS: MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception through December 2025 following PRISMA guidelines. Clinical studies reporting PT outcomes after VSS were included. Random-effects meta-analyses of proportions were conducted to estimate pooled rates of overall improvement, complete resolution, and recurrence. Prespecified subgroup analyses compared IIH versus isolated PT. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies comprising 850 patients were included (641 with IIH; 209 with isolated PT). Venous sinus stenosis accounted for 90.3% of treated etiologies. The pooled rate of overall PT improvement was 89.8% (95% CI, 85.5-92.9). Complete resolution occurred in 87.1% (95% CI, 82.5-90.6). Recurrence at last follow-up was 10.9% (95% CI, 8.3-14.2). Improvement and complete resolution rates did not differ significantly between IIH and isolated PT. Recurrence was higher in IIH (12.0%) than in isolated PT (5.7%), without reaching statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: VSS is associated with high rates of PT improvement and complete resolution with low recurrence. Recurrence trends appear higher in IIH, suggesting underlying pathophysiology may influence durability.

Explore related subjects

HumansTinnitusStentsCranial SinusesConstriction, PathologicTreatment OutcomePseudotumor CerebriIdiopathic intracranial hypertensionMeta-analysisPulsatile tinnitusVenous sinus stenosisVenous sinus stentingJournal ArticleSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sevda Alipour Khabir, Julien Ognard, Gerard El Hajj, Natália Vasconcellos De Oliveira Souza, Owen Heidtke, Tor Lindell, Esref Bayraktar, Cem Bilgin, Sherief Ghozy, Ramanathan Kadirvel, David F Kallmes, Waleed Brinjikji. 2026-07-20. Venous Sinus Stenting for Pulsatile Tinnitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1097/mao.0000000000005016

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Cranial Sinuses subjectHumans subjectJournal Article subjectJournal Article; Systematic Review; Meta-Analysis resourceMeta-Analysis subjectSystematic reviews study

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Advanced/Novel Stenting for Pediatric Dynamic Airway Collapse.

Pediatric dynamic airway collapse is a complex condition that can impact all levels of the pediatric airway. These conditions can pose life threatening risk to pediatric patients and carry lasting impacts. While traditionally, tracheostomy has been used to address all levels of dynamic collapse, recent advances have allowed for more individualized, anatomy-specific stenting and splinting strategies for treatment. This article covers pathophysiology and the latest evidence on strategies to address nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, proximal trachea, and tracheobronchial dynamic collapse.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

A stent-plus-irrigation protocol after adolescent hypospadias repair: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether a stent-plus-irrigation protocol reduces complication rates following hypospadias repair in adolescents compared with catheter drainage alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicentre randomised controlled trial, adolescents (Tanner Stage II-V) undergoing hypospadias repair were randomly assigned to either a stent-plus-irrigation group or a catheter-drainage group. The catheter-drainage group received standard urethral catheter drainage alone, whereas the stent-plus-irrigation group received an additional small-calibre urethral stent positioned within the reconstructed urethra and twice-daily saline irrigation. The primary outcome was the overall postoperative complication rate; secondary outcomes included urinary function and cosmetic outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 172 adolescents were assessed for eligibility, with 150 participants (75 in the stent-plus-irrigation group and 75 in the catheter-drainage group) included in the final analysis. Compared with the catheter-drainage group, the stent-plus-irrigation group demonstrated a significantly lower overall complication rate (risk ratio [RR] 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.56; P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), urethral fistula rate (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.14-0.51; P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), and surgical site infection (SSI) rate (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21-0.87; P&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.020). CONCLUSIONS: A postoperative stent-plus-irrigation protocol was associated with lower rates of postoperative complications, particularly urethral fistula and SSI, compared with catheter drainage alone after adolescent hypospadias repair. Because the intervention included both an additional urethral stent and saline irrigation, the independent contribution of irrigation cannot be determined in this two-arm trial.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Feasibility of implementation, diagnostic accuracy, and end-user impact of an electronic health record (EHR)-based ureteral stent tracking tool in a pediatric population.

INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVES: Ureteral stent tracking systems have reduced stent retention in adults, but their accuracy and impact in pediatrics have been minimally explored. With low event rates in children, such tools may yield high false positives, raising questions on balancing event prevention with provider burden. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, diagnostic accuracy, and end-user impact of an Electronic Surveillance Tool for Evaluating Nephroureteral stent Tracking (eSTENT) at our institution. STUDY DESIGN: eSTENT, implemented in 1/2024, flags ureteral stents at risk for retention based on implant documentation, expected explant date, and explant documentation. Monthly reports are generated for stents missing explant documentation. We retrospectively evaluated the diagnostic performance of eSTENT from 1/2024-8/2025 at our pediatric hospital. A usability survey including a validated 1-7 implementation score (higher = easier implementation) was distributed to pediatric urologists and operating room nurses. RESULTS: Of 172 cases with ureteral stent placement, eSTENT flagged 28 events (16%) in 24 patients. Of these, 26 represented documentation gaps where explant had been appropriate. Two flags had no documentation of explant, representing near miss events that were identified. No retained stents occurred, consistent with high sensitivity and modest specificity. There were no flags in the last 6 months of the study period. Survey response rate was 100% for surgeons and 55% for nurses. Before eSTENT, stents were not routinely tracked. All surgeons and 93% of nurses reported no added burden, despite occasional misidentification of retained stents. Three surgeons found eSTENT beneficial, four were neutral, and free-text responses generally cited eSTENT's "fail safe" nature as positive. Nurses suggested improvements, including user support and integrated documentation reminders. The average implementation score among both groups was 6/7, indicating easy adoption. DISCUSSION: While the impact of stent tracking tools in adult literature has been positive, our study emphasizes the feasibility of broader adoption at a pediatric hospital. Integration of eSTENT may avoid the potentially devastating consequences of a retained stent. Prioritizing sensitivity over specificity appears acceptable for a "never event" in patient safety. Our study is limited by the retrospective nature of data collection and survey bias. CONCLUSIONS: Though no stents were retained in the study period, eSTENT appropriately flagged two cases without added burden to most end-users. Further optimization is warranted, but adoption in pediatric centers may enhance care reliability.

Humans↗