Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42396271

Type 2 diabetes genetics in 125,000 admixed adults from Mexico City.

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a highly heritable, polygenic disease with over 600 loci identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS). However, despite possessing unique genetic variation shaped by demographic history and admixture, Latin American populations remain markedly underrepresented in global genomic research. To address this gap, we conducted genome- and exome-wide analyses of 19,431 T2D cases and 105,611 controls from the Mexico City Prospective Study (MCPS). We identified 86 independent GWAS associations, including 21 novel signals, 15 of which replicated in external cohorts. Risk alleles at novel loci were enriched in individuals with Indigenous American ancestry. Exome analyses revealed rare and ultra-rare missense variants with substantial risk effects at HNF1A and GCK, as well as a protein-damaging variant in SLC30A8 that reduced T2D risk by 45% in carriers. Integrative analyses indicate that T2D genetic architecture in Mexico is predominantly driven by common regulatory variation acting in the endocrine pancreas. Polygenic risk scores strongly stratified T2D risk and transferred to Indigenous Mexican populations. These findings demonstrate the power of large-scale genetic discovery in diverse populations to refine disease architecture and identify loci with potential therapeutic relevance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jason M Torres, Jaime Berumen, Diego Aguilar-Ramirez, Eirini Trichia, Francisco Barajas-Olmos, Humberto García-Ortiz, Sam Morris, Michael Turner, Elizabeth Barrera, Tianshu Liu, Consuelo D Quinto-Cortés, Lauren E Petty, Lourdes García-García, María Teresa Tusié-Luna, Carlos A Aguilar-Salinas, Amanda Y Chong, Paulina Baca, Fernando Rivas, Fiona Bragg, Louisa Gnatiuc Friedrichs, Michael R Hill, Lisa Holland, Alejandra Vergara-Lope, Rachel Wade, Michael J Gaziano, Rory Collins, Eleanor Wheeler, Alan R Shuldiner, Jennifer E Below, Kari E North, Alexandre C Pereira, Andrés Moreno-Estrada, Lorena Orozco, Jesús Alegre-Díaz, Pablo Kuri-Morales, Jonathan R Emberson, Roberto Tapia-Conyer. 2026-06-25. Type 2 diabetes genetics in 125,000 admixed adults from Mexico City.. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.06.23.26356360

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article