Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42297935

Evidence supporting the role of GIGYF2 in synapse development and autism.

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a heterogeneous condition in which genetically defined subtypes offered insights into underlying biological mechanisms and potential targeted treatments. Here, we investigate the clinical and pathogenic significance of GIGYF2 variants in ASD through an integrated approach combining clinical genetics, conditional knockout (cKO) mouse models, neurobiology, and molecular studies. Through targeted sequencing, large-scale genomic data analysis of neurodevelopmental disorder cohorts, and international collaborations, we identified ten affected individuals from eight families harboring de novo or dominantly inherited likely gene-disruptive (LGD) variants and 13 affected individuals from 13 families with de novo missense variants in GIGYF2. Clinical characterization of 16 probands with GIGYF2 variants revealed common features, including ASD, language problems, intellectual disability, and anxiety. In a Gigyf2 cKO mouse model, we observed pronounced autistic-like behaviors, cognitive deficits, and anxiety-like behaviors, mirroring phenotypes observed in affected individuals. Mechanistically, Gigyf2 deficiency disrupted synaptic homeostasis, as evidenced by altered spine density and miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents, and impaired IGF-1R/mTOR signaling, along with dysregulation of synapse-related genes such as Nrp2. Pharmacological inhibition of mTOR with rapamycin or Torin1, as well as Nrp2 knockdown rescued synaptic defects in Gigyf2 KO neurons. These findings define a novel ASD subtype associated with GIGYF2 variants and establish GIGYF2 as a key regulator of synaptic development and function, implicating GIGYF2 dysfunction in ASD pathogenesis and highlighting the IGF-1R/mTOR pathway as a potential therapeutic target for GIGYF2-related ASD subtype.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bin Yu, Shimeng Zhu, Linhu Xiao, Guodong Chen, Suixin Deng, Ziyang Wang, Ruijia Zhuang, Yongqing Lyu, Senwei Tan, Xiangbin Jia, Xinyue Liao, Yang Liao, Xiangyu Li, Ge Zhang, Qiumeng Zhang, Yizheng Jiang, Ting Bai, Pisheng Zhu, Lu Shen, Kendra Hoekzema, Konrad Platzer, Franziska Schnabel, Rami Abou Jamra, Hilde Peeters, Sophie Rondeau, Marlène Rio, Giulia Barcia, Rachel Fisher, Mark C Hannibal, Olivia L Kesler, Nathaniel H Robin, Isabelle Thiffault, Vitoria K Paolillo, Jonas Helbig, Ling Yuan, Zhengmao Hu, Jiada Li, Jieqiong Tan, Evan E Eichler, Kun Xia, Hui Guo. 2026-06-15. Evidence supporting the role of GIGYF2 in synapse development and autism.. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-026-03681-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article