Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

Ge Zhang

Publications and source records attributed to Ge Zhang.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Evidence supporting the role of GIGYF2 in synapse development and autism.

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a heterogeneous condition in which genetically defined subtypes offered insights into underlying biological mechanisms and potential targeted treatments. Here, we investigate the clinical and pathogenic significance of GIGYF2 variants in ASD through an integrated approach combining clinical genetics, conditional knockout (cKO) mouse models, neurobiology, and molecular studies. Through targeted sequencing, large-scale genomic data analysis of neurodevelopmental disorder cohorts, and international collaborations, we identified ten affected individuals from eight families harboring de novo or dominantly inherited likely gene-disruptive (LGD) variants and 13 affected individuals from 13 families with de novo missense variants in GIGYF2. Clinical characterization of 16 probands with GIGYF2 variants revealed common features, including ASD, language problems, intellectual disability, and anxiety. In a Gigyf2 cKO mouse model, we observed pronounced autistic-like behaviors, cognitive deficits, and anxiety-like behaviors, mirroring phenotypes observed in affected individuals. Mechanistically, Gigyf2 deficiency disrupted synaptic homeostasis, as evidenced by altered spine density and miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents, and impaired IGF-1R/mTOR signaling, along with dysregulation of synapse-related genes such as Nrp2. Pharmacological inhibition of mTOR with rapamycin or Torin1, as well as Nrp2 knockdown rescued synaptic defects in Gigyf2 KO neurons. These findings define a novel ASD subtype associated with GIGYF2 variants and establish GIGYF2 as a key regulator of synaptic development and function, implicating GIGYF2 dysfunction in ASD pathogenesis and highlighting the IGF-1R/mTOR pathway as a potential therapeutic target for GIGYF2-related ASD subtype.

Journal Article

In vitro activity of contezolid and other comparators against clinical Staphylococcus and Enterococcus: a multicenter study in China.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the in vitro activity of contezolid against clinical Staphylococcus and Enterococcus isolates from across China, and compare its performance with linezolid and other key agents. METHODS: A total of 2510 non-duplicate Gram-positive cocci isolates were collected from 70 hospitals in seven Chinese regions. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using broth microdilution (BMD) per CLSI guidelines. MIC50/90 values, susceptibility rates, cumulative MIC curves and MIC distribution agreement between contezolid and linezolid were assessed. Linezolid-resistant isolates and contezolid-resistant isolates-defined as those based on CLSI 2025 linezolid breakpoints-underwent whole-genome sequencing and comprehensive screening for known oxazolidinone resistance determinants, including acquired resistance genes, 23S rRNA mutations and amino acid substitutions in ribosomal proteins L3, L4 and L22. RESULTS: Contezolid exhibited potent in vitro activity, with >99% of isolates inhibited at ≤4 mg/L and showed lower MIC50/90 than linezolid, with a consistently left-shifted cumulative MIC distribution. Cohen's kappa analysis supporting enhanced activity of contezolid. Notably, we report for the first time clinical isolates with contezolid MICs up to 16 mg/L. Whole-genome analysis of 14 linezolid-resistant isolates (including five resistant to contezolid) revealed universal presence of optrA, cfr, fexA and other resistance genes, alongside domain V 23S rRNA mutations and substitutions in ribosomal proteins L3 and L4, supporting a shared genetic basis and potential cross-resistance between the two agents. CONCLUSIONS: Contezolid demonstrated potent and consistent activity against drug-resistant Gram-positive cocci, supporting its potential as a therapeutic alternative to linezolid. Further studies are needed to confirm resistance mechanisms and clinical utility.

Microbial Sensitivity Tests